Line 249: | Line 249: | ||
==MCM 4 - Construction Stormwater Runoff Control== | ==MCM 4 - Construction Stormwater Runoff Control== | ||
+ | {| class="wikitable" style="float:center; margin-left: 10px; width:1000px; border: 2px solid white" | ||
+ | |- style="border: 2px solid white" | ||
+ | ! style="background: #d0e5f5" | Activity description | ||
+ | ! style="background: #d0e5f5" | Activity complete and available? | ||
+ | |- style="border: 2px solid white" | ||
+ | | style="background: #f1f5fc" | The SWPPP document identifies BMPs to develop and support the program that reduces pollutants in stormwater runoff to the small MS4 from construction activity. | ||
+ | | style="background: #f1f5fc" | Yes or No | ||
+ | |- style="border: 2px solid white" | ||
+ | | style="background: #E6F2FF" | The SWPPP document identifies measurable goals for each BMP (e.g. number of trained inspectors) and timeframes and staff responsible for implementation. | ||
+ | | style="background: #E6F2FF" | Yes or No | ||
+ | |- style="border: 2px solid white" | ||
+ | | style="background: #f1f5fc" | Regulatory mechanism has been adopted to address construction site stormwater runoff control. | ||
+ | | style="background: #f1f5fc" | Yes or No | ||
+ | |- style="border: 2px solid white" | ||
+ | | style="background: #E6F2FF" | Site plan review procedures have been developed and followed to ensure compliance with the construction site stormwater runoff control regulatory mechanism. | ||
+ | | style="background: #E6F2FF" | Yes or No | ||
+ | |- style="border: 2px solid white" | ||
+ | | style="background: #f1f5fc" | Site plan review procedures notify applicants of need to get coverage under the MPCA’s Construction Stormwater General Permit (Permit number MN R100001). | ||
+ | | style="background: #f1f5fc" | Yes or No | ||
+ | |- style="border: 2px solid white" | ||
+ | | style="background: #E6F2FF" | Written procedures have been developed for consideration of reports submitted by the public related to noncompliance or other stormwater related information at construction sites. | ||
+ | | style="background: #E6F2FF" | Yes or No | ||
+ | |- style="border: 2px solid white" | ||
+ | | style="background: #f1f5fc" |Construction Site Inspection procedures have been developed and followed. Procedures must include the following: | ||
+ | *prioritization criteria for sites to be inspected, | ||
+ | *a frequency for construction site inspections, and | ||
+ | *name/title of those conducting site inspections. | ||
+ | | style="background: #f1f5fc" | Yes or No | ||
+ | |- style="border: 2px solid white" | ||
+ | | style="background: #E6F2FF" | Construction site inspections are documented by checklists or other written means. | ||
+ | | style="background: #E6F2FF" | Yes or No | ||
+ | |- style="border: 2px solid white" | ||
+ | | style="background: #f1f5fc" | ERPs to compel compliance with the construction site stormwater runoff control regulatory mechanism has been developed. | ||
+ | | style="background: #f1f5fc" | Yes or No | ||
+ | |- style="border: 2px solid white" | ||
+ | | style="background: #E6F2FF" | Procedures for responding to spills has been developed and followed. | ||
+ | | style="background: #E6F2FF" | Yes or No | ||
+ | |- style="border: 2px solid white" | ||
+ | | style="background: #f1f5fc" | Site plan reviews of construction site stormwater runoff control are documented with stormwater related comments and supporting information. | ||
+ | | style="background: #f1f5fc" | Yes or No | ||
+ | |- style="border: 2px solid white" | ||
+ | | style="background: #E6F2FF" | Site plan reviewers and construction site inspectors are trained and the training is documented. | ||
+ | | style="background: #E6F2FF" | Yes or No | ||
+ | |- style="border: 2px solid white" | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Tips for a successful construction stormwater program''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | *Fill out a standard checklist during all construction site inspections. | ||
+ | *Ensure your regulatory mechanism requires all erosion, sediment, and waste controls as described in the Construction Stormwater General Permit. | ||
+ | *Fill out a standard checklist during all site plan reviews. | ||
+ | *Document all enforcement actions, including verbal warnings. | ||
+ | *Use a database or spreadsheet to track all required information related to enforcement actions. | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Questions and concepts to consider''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | *What are the difference between inspecting a private and publically owned/operated construction site? | ||
+ | *What is the process for conducting a construction site inspection and what does the inspector look for onsite? | ||
+ | *What is the process, from application to approval, for a proposed construction project? | ||
+ | *What is the site review process – who is involved, what is evaluated, and how are findings communicated with the applicant? | ||
+ | *How does the construction site inspector know when to pursue and elevate enforcement actions? | ||
==MCM 5 - Post-construction Stormwater Management== | ==MCM 5 - Post-construction Stormwater Management== | ||
==MCM 6 - Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations== | ==MCM 6 - Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations== |
The purpose of this document is to provide municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) staff guidance on how to conduct a self-audit of a stormwater pollution prevention program (SWPPP).
The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) staff conduct audits of SWPPPs to determine compliance with the MS4 General Permit and to provide technical assistance to staff in regulated MS4s. The MPCA’s intent is to audit all SWPPPs for MS4s regulated under the MS4 General Permit every seven years. Between MPCA audits, you may want to conduct a self-audit to check your progress with meeting permit requirements.
This document details each of the six Minimum Control Measures (MCMs) described in the MS4 General Permit and the activities required to be implemented and/or documented under each MCM. During the self-audit, you should review each permit requirement and note whether or not the activity is complete. In addition, documentation of the activity should be easily accessible and available for review. If specific documentation is required, it is noted with the activity’s description. Also review the MPCA’s guidance on the documentation required to be retained under the MS4 General Permit.
During the self-audit, review your SWPPP document that was submitted to the MPCA upon application for permit coverage. The SWPPP document has, for each MCM, your MS4-specific measureable goals, established best management practices (BMPs), timeframes for new BMP implementation, and the name or position title of staff responsible for BMP implementation. The BMPs, measurable goals, and timeframes indicated in the SWPPP document may be changed if you feel your SWPPP would benefit from being updated after your self-audit or annual program evaluation.
Before conducting your self-audit, gather all files, documents, and materials related to your SWPPP, including annual reports, SWPPP document, public notices, maps, written procedures, enforcement action documentation, regulatory mechanism(s), etc. Once all documents are gathered, use the tables below to guide the self-audit of your program. To mark an activity complete, you must have all supporting documentation and the activity must meet all of the requirements.
In this guidance we have included tips on enhancing your SWPPP for each MCM. These are not direct permit requirements, but methods MPCA staff have observed during audits that make local stormwater programs more effective.
We have also included general questions MPCA staff could ask during an audit. These questions are to prompt thought about your SWPPP in areas MPCA staff may focus during the audit. MPCA staff will ask general questions during the audit, but also questions specific to your SWPPP and stormwater activities. The questions noted in this document are not a final and complete list of questions that can or will be asked during an MPCA audit.
Please note that completing a self-audit, regardless of the results, does not preclude the MPCA from taking enforcement after an MPCA lead audit related to any of the activities required by the MS4 General Permit. If you have any questions relating to your SWPPP, please contact the appropriate MPCA staff, listed on the MS4 Permittee Staff Assignments webpage in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual.
In addition, please refer to the Self-audit webinar for additional information.
Activity description | Activity complete and available? |
---|---|
Staff and their stormwater responsibilities documented for those who implement components of the SWPPP. | Yes or No |
A map of the MS4 system with the following:
|
Yes or No |
Partnerships established to implement the SWPPP or aspects of the SWPPP, including any formal agreements. | Yes or No |
Enforcement actions conducted are documented, including verbal warnings, with the following information:
|
Yes or No |
A Pond, Wetland, and Lake Inventory complete and submitted to the MPCA. | Yes or No |
For MS4s that discharge to waters with a total maximum daily load (TMDL) that was approved by USEPA before the issuance of the MS4 General Permit. For each TMDL, documentation of the following:
|
Yes or No |
For MS4s with an Alum or Ferric Chloride Phosphorus Treatment System. Documentation of the following:
|
Yes or No |
Tips for overall program management
Questions and concepts to consider
Activity description | Activity complete and available? |
---|---|
The SWPPP document describing BMPs to educate the public on the impact stormwater discharges have on water bodies and actions citizens, businesses, and other local organizations can take to reduce the discharge of pollutants to stormwater. | Yes or No |
The SWPPP document with measurable goals for each BMP (e.g. number of materials distributed, number of website hits, or number/percentage of behaviors changed) and timeframes and staff responsible for implementation. | Yes or No |
Partnerships established to implement the SWPPP or aspects of the SWPPP, including any formal agreements. | Yes or No |
High priority stormwater-related issue(s) are identified (e.g., specific TMDL reduction targets; responsible management of pet waste, household chemicals, yard waste, or deicing materials). | Yes or No |
Outreach and educational materials related to stormwater-related high priority issues are distributed and documented. | Yes or No |
Outreach and educational materials related to illicit discharge recognition and reporting are documented. | Yes or No |
Implementation plan developed that consists of the following:
|
Yes or No |
An annual evaluation of the effectiveness of the implementation plan has been completed. | Yes or No |
Modifications made to the program as a result of the annual evaluation are documented. | Yes or No |
Public education activities held are documented, including dates of the activities. | Yes or No |
Educational materials have been distributed and documented with quantities, descriptions, and dates. | Yes or No |
Tips for a successful public education and outreach program
Questions and concepts to consider
Activity description | Activity complete and available? |
---|---|
The SWPPP document identifies public involvement BMPs to solicit public input on the SWPPP. | Yes or No |
The SWPPP document identifies measurable goals for each BMP (e.g. numbers of public meetings held or number participants involved in specific activities), associated timeframes, and staff responsible for implementation. | Yes or No |
Annual public opportunity for the public to provide input on the SWPPP is held and documented with dates and locations of events and notices to the public. | Yes or No |
Access provided to the following:
|
Yes or No |
Events and notices to the public of events scheduled are documented with dates and locations. | Yes or No |
Outreach and educational materials related to illicit discharge recognition and reporting are documented. | Yes or No |
Public input regarding the SWPPP is considered and documented with MS4 staff responses and subsequent modifications to the SWPPP. | Yes or No |
Tips for a successful public involvement program
Questions and concepts to consider
Activity description | Activity complete and available? |
---|---|
The SWPPP document identifies BMPs to detect and eliminate illicit discharges into the small MS4. | Yes or No |
The SWPPP document identifies measurable goals for each BMP (e.g. number of staff trained, amount of pipe to be televised, or number of dry weather inspections completed) and timeframes and staff responsible for implementation. | Yes or No |
Regulatory mechanism adopted to prohibit illicit discharges into your MS4. | Yes or No |
Enforcement Response Procedures (ERPs) developed to compel compliance with the regulatory mechanism that prohibits illicit discharges into the MS4. | Yes or No |
Illicit discharge detection is incorporated into all inspection and maintenance activities, including during dry weather. | Yes or No |
Visual inspections are used to detect and track the source of illicit discharges. | Yes or No |
Field staff are trained in illicit discharge recognition. | Yes or No |
Priority areas likely to have illicit discharges and more frequent illicit discharge inspections are identified and the dates and locations of inspections documented. | Yes or No |
Procedures for investigating, locating, and eliminating the source of illicit discharges has been developed and followed. | Yes or No |
Procedures for responding to spills has been developed and followed. | Yes or No |
Reports of alleged illicit discharges received are documented with dates of the reports and any follow-up actions taken. | Yes or No |
Dates of discovery of all illicit discharges are documented with the following:
|
Yes or No |
Tips for a successful illicit discharge detection & elimination program
Questions and concepts to consider
Activity description | Activity complete and available? |
---|---|
The SWPPP document identifies BMPs to develop and support the program that reduces pollutants in stormwater runoff to the small MS4 from construction activity. | Yes or No |
The SWPPP document identifies measurable goals for each BMP (e.g. number of trained inspectors) and timeframes and staff responsible for implementation. | Yes or No |
Regulatory mechanism has been adopted to address construction site stormwater runoff control. | Yes or No |
Site plan review procedures have been developed and followed to ensure compliance with the construction site stormwater runoff control regulatory mechanism. | Yes or No |
Site plan review procedures notify applicants of need to get coverage under the MPCA’s Construction Stormwater General Permit (Permit number MN R100001). | Yes or No |
Written procedures have been developed for consideration of reports submitted by the public related to noncompliance or other stormwater related information at construction sites. | Yes or No |
Construction Site Inspection procedures have been developed and followed. Procedures must include the following:
|
Yes or No |
Construction site inspections are documented by checklists or other written means. | Yes or No |
ERPs to compel compliance with the construction site stormwater runoff control regulatory mechanism has been developed. | Yes or No |
Procedures for responding to spills has been developed and followed. | Yes or No |
Site plan reviews of construction site stormwater runoff control are documented with stormwater related comments and supporting information. | Yes or No |
Site plan reviewers and construction site inspectors are trained and the training is documented. | Yes or No |
Tips for a successful construction stormwater program
Questions and concepts to consider