m () |
|||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
{{:General relationship of soil bulk density to root growth based on soil texture}} | {{:General relationship of soil bulk density to root growth based on soil texture}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Vegetative growth - Water stable aggregates=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===Vegetative growth - Soil structure=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===Vegetative growth - plant roots=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===Vegetative growth - Nutrient status=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===Vegetative growth - pH=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===Vegetative growth - Soil contamination=== | ||
+ | '''Importance''': Soils may contain concentrations of certain chemicals that are toxic to plants. Pollutants of greatest concern include metals (copper, lead, cadmium, nickel, zinc), sodium and chloride from road salt application, pesticides, and some hydrocarbons (e.g. oil, PAHs). Sites with known contamination may contain other pollutants, such as arsenic, but these soils are generally not suitable for stormwater applications without remediation. | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Assessment''': Most urban soils do not contain chemicals at concentrations which restrict plant growth, although concentrations of these chemicals are typically greater than natural background. Chemical sampling is expensive, particularly for organic contaminants. An assessment of soil contamination should therefore begin with a site investigation to identify the presence of contaminant sources or historical activities that may have resulted in soil contamination. | ||
+ | *Site visit: Conduct a site visit and determine if any of the following exist at the site - soil stockpiles, tanks or drums, odor(s), visual staining of soils, dead or dying vegetation, and debris that may be a source of contaminants. | ||
+ | *Site review: Conduct a site review consisting of a search for nearby contaminated sites, site historical search to identify past uses, and review of historical aerial photos. [https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=Screening_assessment_for_contamination_at_potential_stormwater_infiltration_sites#Conducting_a_property_review Link here for more information and sources]. | ||
+ | Regardless of the results for a site visit and site review, soil sampling is warranted for certain land use settings. The adjacent table provides a summary of potential pollutant concerns for specific land uses. If sampling is warranted, use appropriate sampling and test methods, [https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=Soil_sampling_and_tests described on this page]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{:Pollutants of Concern from Operations (adapted from CWP, 2005).}} |
Indicators for determining soil health. | ||||
Indicator | Vegetative growth | Soil biotic function | Soil hydrologic function | Soil erosion potential |
Compaction/bulk density | Yes | Yes | Yes | If surface compacted |
Soil health is an assessment of how well soil performs all of its functions now and how those functions are being preserved for future use. The assessment of soil health depends on the desired functions of the soil. In agricultural applications, for example, soil health is determined by assessing properties that affect plant growth, such nutrient status, pH, and bulk density.
For stormwater applications, soil health can be assessed for the following functions.
Each of these is discussed below.
The following indicators can be used to assess suitability of a soil to support plant/vegetative growth.
Importance: Soil compaction results from repeated traffic, generally from machinery, or repeated tillage at the same depth, which results in a compacted layer at the tillage depth. Compaction inhibits infiltration, gas and water movement, may impede root growth, disrupts habitat for soil biota, and affects nutrient cycling. See Soil physical properties and processes for a discussion of bulk density.
Assessment There are multiple methods for measuring bulk density and compaction (resistance). See methods for measuring and methods for measuring compaction. Recommended methods of assessment include the following.
General relationship of soil bulk density to root growth based on soil texture
Link to this table
Soil texture | Ideal bulk densities (g/cm3) | Bulk densities that may affect plantgrowth (g/cm3) | Bulk densities that restrict root growth (g/cm3) |
---|---|---|---|
sands, loamy sands | <1.60 | 1.69 | >1.80 |
sandy loams, loams | <1.40 | 1.63 | >1.80 |
sandy clay loams, loams, clay loams | <1.40 | 1.60 | >1.75 |
silts, silt loams | <1.30 | 1.60 | >1.75 |
silt loams, silty clay loams | <1.40 | 1.55 | >1.65 |
sandy clays, silty clays, clay loams with 35-45% clay | <1.10 | 1.49 | >1.58 |
clays (>45% clay) | <1.10 | 1.39 | >1.47 |
Importance: Soils may contain concentrations of certain chemicals that are toxic to plants. Pollutants of greatest concern include metals (copper, lead, cadmium, nickel, zinc), sodium and chloride from road salt application, pesticides, and some hydrocarbons (e.g. oil, PAHs). Sites with known contamination may contain other pollutants, such as arsenic, but these soils are generally not suitable for stormwater applications without remediation.
Assessment: Most urban soils do not contain chemicals at concentrations which restrict plant growth, although concentrations of these chemicals are typically greater than natural background. Chemical sampling is expensive, particularly for organic contaminants. An assessment of soil contamination should therefore begin with a site investigation to identify the presence of contaminant sources or historical activities that may have resulted in soil contamination.
Regardless of the results for a site visit and site review, soil sampling is warranted for certain land use settings. The adjacent table provides a summary of potential pollutant concerns for specific land uses. If sampling is warranted, use appropriate sampling and test methods, described on this page.
Pollutants of Concern from Operations (adapted from CWP, 2005).