Erosion prevention practices - Riprap

Example of a riprap lined channel. Click image for more info. (Source: Tetra Tech)

Riprap is a permanent layer of large, angular stone, cobbles, or boulders typically used to armor, stabilize, and protect the soil surface against erosion and scour in areas of concentrated flow or wave energy. Riprap is typically placed along graded ditch, channel, and shoreline banks over geotextile, which prevents erosional undercutting. It can also be used with other mixed size rock to construct retention berms for sediment traps and check dams protecting high volume/velocity culvert inlets. The Minnesota Department of Transportation classifies riprap by type as random riprap or hand-placed riprap, depending on the method of placement and the stone size specified.

Purpose and function

Riprap is used to stabilize areas on a construction site with high erosive power by increasing surface roughness and slowing the velocity of runoff. Applicable areas on a site may include inlets and outlets of storm pipes and culverts, bridges, slopes drains, storm drains, and other areas where concentrated runoff may occur. Riprap is also effective for protecting and stabilizing slopes, channels, streambanks, and shorelines.

Applicability

As discussed above, there are many applications where riprap is more desirable than other erosion control practices. Although riprap is not often considered aesthetically pleasing, it can be one of the most effective methods of erosion prevention and is particularly desirable in areas where conditions prohibit establishment of vegetation (for example, areas where velocities are too great for vegetation to withstand). Compared to other erosion control practices, riprap is relatively simple to install and maintain. However, riprap is typically more expensive to install compared to vegetation (i.e. due to equipment and handling costs) and does not provide some of the secondary benefits provided by vegetated practices (e.g., habitat enhancement).

Site Applicability

Riprap is useful in areas in which the powers of erosion outweigh the stabilization capacity of other erosion control practices such as vegetative control and mulching. As noted above, riprap is especially useful for armoring channel and ditch banks, lake shorelines, and for sediment trap berms and high-volume/velocity check dams. Because of the “hard” look of riprap, its higher overall cost, the growing popularity of vegetated solutions using turf reinforcement matting and other products, and the difficulty in removing it after installation, contractors should ensure that the post-construction site design specifically includes riprap before using it during construction. Riprap may be unstable on very steep slopes. For slopes steeper than 2:1, consider using materials other than riprap for erosion protection such as turf reinforcement matting over seed, open-cell articulated concrete mats, or other slope protection geogrid products/matrices.

Permit applicability

Riprap as a stabilization measure

Riprap is often used for stabilization of construction sites. Section 25.30 of the MPCA Construction Stormwater General Permit (2018) defines stabilization and specifically identifies riprap as an appropriate stabilization measure, stating: “’Stabilize’, ‘Stabilized’, ‘Stabilization’ means the exposed ground surface has been covered by appropriate materials such as mulch, staked sod, riprap, erosion control blanket, mats or other material that prevents erosion from occurring. Grass seeding, agricultural crop seeding or other seeding alone is not stabilization. Mulch materials must achieve approximately 90 percent ground coverage (typically 2 tons of mulch per acre).”

Because stabilization is required and essential for most construction activities, it is mentioned numerous times throughout the 2018 Permit. While “riprap” is not specifically mentioned in these instances, it is implicitly included due to its widespread acceptance as an effective stabilization practice. As noted above, before using riprap the site manager should check with the design engineer to ensure that the post-construction configuration includes riprap prior to its installation. In many cases it may be far less expensive to install the post-construction vegetation with whatever stabilization matrix is called for (e.g., turf reinforcement mat, articulated concrete mat, geogrid, etc.) during construction, rather than having to place and then later remove riprap. Several key locations in the permit that mention stabilization are noted below.

• (Erosion Prevention Practices) Section 8.4 states: “Permittees must stabilize all exposed soil areas, including stockpiles. Stabilization must be initiated immediately to limit soil erosion when construction activity has permanently or temporarily ceased on any portion of the site and will not resume for a period exceeding 14 calendar days. Stabilization must be completed no later than 14 calendar days after the construction activity has ceased. Stabilization is not required on constructed base components of roads, parking lots and similar surfaces. Stabilization is not required on temporary stockpiles without significant silt, clay or organic components (e.g., clean aggregate stockpiles, demolition concrete stockpiles, sand stockpiles) but permittees must provide sediment controls at the base of the stockpile.”
• (Erosion Prevention Practices) Section 8.5 states: “For Public Waters that the Minnesota DNR has promulgated "work in water restrictions" during specified fish spawning time frames, permittees must complete stabilization of all exposed soil areas within 200 feet of the water's edge, and that drain to these waters, within 24 hours during the restriction period.”
• (Erosion Prevention Practices) Section 8.6 states: “Permittees must stabilize the normal wetted perimeter of the last 200 linear feet of temporary or permanent drainage ditches or swales that drain water from the site within 24 hours after connecting to a surface water or property edge. Permittees must complete stabilization of remaining portions of temporary or permanent ditches or swales within 14 calendar days after connecting to a surface water or property edge and construction in that portion of the ditch temporarily or permanently ceases.”
• (Discharges to Special and Impaired Waters) Section 23.9 states: “Permittees must immediately initiate stabilization of exposed soil areas, as described in item 8.4, and complete the stabilization within seven (7) calendar days after the construction activity in that portion of the site temporarily or permanently ceases.”

Riprap as an energy dissipation measure

In addition to stabilization, riprap is also used as an energy dissipation measure to reduce the erosive force of concentrated stormwater and prevent scour. Section 25.8 of the MPCA Construction Stormwater General Permit (2018) defines energy dissipation as “methods employed at pipe outlets to prevent erosion caused by the rapid discharge of water scouring soils.” Energy dissipation is mentioned at several locations in the Permit:

• (Erosion Prevention Practices) Section 8.9 states: “Permittees must provide temporary or permanent energy dissipation at all pipe outlets within 24 hours after connection to a surface water or permanent stormwater treatment system.”
• (Temporary Sediment Basins) Section 14.7 states: “Permittees must provide energy dissipation for the basin outlet within 24 hours after connection to a surface water.”
• (Wet Sedimentation Basin) Section 18.6 states: “Permittees must design basin outlets to prevent short-circuiting and the discharge of floating debris. Basin outlets must have energy dissipation.”

Effectiveness

When properly designed and installed riprap can be an effective erosion control practice for armoring slopes and channel banks. When used as a containment berm (e.g., as a sediment trap), riprap can help to control sediment. The following table provides information on the expected performance benefits for riprap when used for erosion control.

Expected performance benefits for riprap.
Link to this table

Water quantity
Flow attenuation	Little or no design benefit
Runoff volume reduction	Little or no design benefit
Water quality
Soil erosion	Primary design benefit
Sediment control	Little or no design benefit
Nutrient loading	Little or no design benefit
Pollutant removal
Total suspended solids	Little or no design benefit
Total phosphorus	Little or no design benefit
Heavy metals	Little or no design benefit
Floatables	Little or no design benefit
Oil and grease	Little or no design benefit

Planning considerations

Riprap is often required in places that are not easy to get to, yet it is often the really tough places to reach that experience riprap failure (MnDOT, 2006). The following considerations, which are discussed in greater detail in Design and Construction recommendations and specifications. are essential when planning riprap installation for a construction site.

• Riprap should be placed as soon as possible after site disturbance begins before additional water is concentrated into the drainage system.
• When designing riprap systems, well-graded riprap should be used rather than uniform riprap because it will form a dense and flexible cover that can adapt well, even on uneven surfaces. Uniform riprap also requires more intensive labor to install compared to graded riprap.
• Use the appropriate size rock for the discharge or flow velocity. If in doubt, go with larger rather than smaller. Water will carry away rock that is not sufficiently sized.
• Make sure that the rock is angular and variably sized. Along with the largest diameter needed for the flow rate of the discharge, include enough small, sharp-edged rock to lock the large rock in place.
• Riprap should always be underlain by a filter material consisting of granular material or a nonwoven geotextile fabric to prevent underlying soil from piping through the riprap stone. The bedding or geotextile fabric must be sized properly in order to prevent erosion or undermining of the underlying soils. If filter material is not used, the rock will become buried in the soil on which it was placed.

Design

Profile of a riprap lined channel. Click on image for more info. (Source: MnDOT)

Under-sizing riprap could greatly reduce its effectiveness. Follow MnDOT standards and specifications on riprap size and quality to ensure maximum effectiveness (see Construction recommendations and specifications). The following design recommendations apply to riprap.

Site preparation

Before laying riprap, filter material should be placed on a prepared surface in accordance with site plans unless otherwise required by the contract. The foundation surface should be relatively smooth and free of stones, sticks, or other debris. Filter material can be either granular filter or nonwoven geotextile filter, unless specified in the contract. The primary function of a filter material or filter fabric is to prevent soil from “piping” through the riprap stone.

If using granular material, spread the filter material to a minimum thickness of at least 6 inches over the prepared foundation. If using a geotextile, ensure that the fabric liner is pulled taut with no folds or creases before anchoring in place (if needed) with stables or anchor pins. To prevent water from flowing beneath fabric, overlap edges by at least a foot and a half in the downhill or downstream direction. Riprap should be placed over the geotextile fabric no later than seven (7) days after the fabric is laid. Avoid tearing, puncturing, or shifting the fabric and do not operate equipment on top of the geotextile or stones after placement. Geotextile filter material should not be used under hand placed or grouted riprap unless required by the contract.

If placing geotextile on slopes steeper than 3:1 (horizontal to vertical), anchor the geotextile in consecutive trenches on the contour at least every 15 feet. Geotextile should not be used on slopes exceeding 2:1 (horizontal to vertical).

Riprap sizing

Random riprap consists of various sizes of stone that produce a dense, uniform, stable layer of stone with no large voids . Large individual stones may measure up to 2 cubic ft and weigh 50 lbs or more. There is no minimum weight for smaller stones required for filling in between these individual stones. Use of the smaller rock prevents undercutting and erosion by flowing water, and helps to keep the larger rock in place.

Stone selected for riprap installations must meet MnDOT Specifications 3601 (Riprap Material), including the following:

• Each individual stone has at least one fractured face;
• Free of soil or other debris before placement;
• Contains less than ten (10) percent of the following by weight:
  • Stones with defects that could cause excessive deterioration or degradation during service such as cracks or seams;
  • Stone with a width or thickness less than thirty (30) percent of the length;
• If using carbonate quarry/bedrock material used in total or in part, the portion of the insoluble residue passing the #200 sieve is no greater than 10 percent; and
• 100 percent virgin materials must be used for riprap and granular filter.

Riprap sizing should also account for the expected velocity of water. The table below provides recommended sizing of riprap rock based on velocity.

Riprap size will increase with velocity. Maximum riprap rock size in diameter for different velocities. (Source: Adapted from New York State Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control, 2016).

Riprap size will increase with velocity.
Link to this table

Rock riprap maximum size based on velocity of flow
Velocity (feet per second)	dmax (inches)
5.0	6
8.5	12
10	18
12	24
15	36

Additional information on riprap sizing for energy dissipation can be found here: Sediment control practices - Outlet energy dissipation

Riprap placement

When placing stones, care should be taken to not puncture the base fabric. Drop stones from a height not exceeding one (1) foot unless the base fabric is sufficiently covered with granular cushion (about 6 inches deep) in which case stones can be dropped up from a height of up to three (3) feet. Riprap should be placed starting at the lowest elevation and working upwards.

Random riprap should be position in such a way as to provide a uniform distribution of the various sizes of stone and to produce a dense, interlocked layer of stones. After placement, the surface of the riprapped area should be leveled to be flush with the surrounding ground to produce a reasonably uniform appearance and the thickness required by the contract.

For hand-placed riprap, embed the stones in the foundation material, with the axis of the stone that most nearly approximates the contract-required thickness of riprap laid perpendicular to the foundation slope. Lay stones with the least practicable space between them. Position the stones to stagger the joints up the slope. Place each stone to allow the foundation material and adjacent stones to carry its mass. Use selected stones set to line and grade to define the ends and edges of each riprap area. After laying the larger stones, fill the spaces between the stones with firmly seated, smaller stones to produce a uniform surface.

For fully grouted riprap, use clean stone and ensure grout fills the spaces between stones throughout the entire thickness of the riprap. Stones should be thoroughly wetted immediately before placing the grout, and the surface should be swept with a stiff broom after pouring grout to finish. [See https://www.dot.state.mn.us/bridge/hydraulics/resources/matrixriprapsummarysheet.pdf for further information] on grouted riprap.

After placing riprap, ensure that each riprapped area has a minimum thickness of at least eighty (80) percent of the thickness per the contract requirements, and an average of at least ninety-five (95) percent of the thickness when measured at right angles to the face.

The Construction recommendations and specifications discussedin the next section elaborates these design recommendations.

Vegetated and aggregate riprap
While the use of riprap to armor high-velocity channels provides superior erosion protection in most cases, there are notable non-stormwater drawbacks in some situations. For example, riprap extending from the waterline of a channel or lake up to a structure (e.g., roadway, bridge, bulkhead, building, etc.) can block normal wildlife movement along the water’s edge. This situation can create a hazard to wildlife and to vehicle traffic, if deer and other animals are forced out onto a roadway. Riprap may also be undesirable aesthetically in some settings, due to the “hard” look of large chunks of rock where vegetation normally would be found, such as along a channel bank or lakeshore.

The strategic use of mulch, compost, topsoil, and vegetation in the final design can ameliorate these concerns. Transportation engineers in Minnesota have been successfully incorporating wildlife passage benches through sections of riprapped slope, using these materials to construct a walkable pathway in places where riprap may create a migration obstacle (e.g., under bridges). The passage bench resembles a hiking trail cutout on a slope. Mulch, compost, and topsoil is placed over the riprap walkway bench to ease the passage of animals over the rock. Where large rock may create voids that are difficult to fill with organic materials, smaller rock and geotextile can be used to create a base.

A similar approach can be used where aesthetical concerns regarding riprap may be present. Mulch, compost, and topsoil can be sprinkled and spread liberally above the normal waterline in the riprap to support the type of planted or emergent vegetation usually found along channels and lakeshores. After a few years of growth, the vegetation will begin to soften and even obscure the look of the riprap – and even help to hold it in place, against the shear stress of moving water and wave action. This approach can be employed on conventional riprap applications and where rock-filled gabion baskets are used.

Construction recommendations and specifications

The MnDOT Standard Specifications for Construction (2018 Edition) include several specifications related to riprap.

MnDOT Specification 2511 is dedicated entirely to riprap; specifically, (2511.1) “providing and placing stone riprap, with or without grouting, as a protective covering on earth slopes, piers, abutments, walls, or other structures, where the soil is susceptible to erosion.” Further, “The Department classifies riprap by type as random riprap or handplaced riprap, depending on the method of placement and the stone size specified.”

MnDOT Specification 2511 Part A includes guidance for placement of riprap, stating: “Provide and place stone riprap as shown on the plans or as directed by the Engineer. Excavate and shape the foundation for the riprap, with or without filter material, to the cross-sections as shown on the plans, unless otherwise directed by the Engineer. Compact loose foundation material before placing the riprap or filter material. If the contract requires, place a layer of riprap at least a 1 ft thick on a filter material, unless otherwise required by the contract or directed by the Engineer. Grout riprap as required by the contract or as directed by the Engineer. Place the riprap on a filter layer consisting of granular material or geotextile. Fully grouted riprap is not allowed in public waters.”

MnDOT Specification 2511 Part B discusses placement of filter material under riprap, stating: “Place filter material under the riprap unless otherwise required by the contract. The Contractor may choose the type of filter material, except as required by the contract.” Per Part B, filter material may either be granular or geotextile material. Parts B.1 (Granular Filter) and B.2 (Geotextile Filter) provide detailed guidance on proper placement, dimensions, and applicable site conditions for the use of granular filter or geotextile filter materials in conjunction with riprap. In all cases, ensure that the geotextile underlayer is properly staked to the slope in accordance with manufacturer’s recommendations to ensure it remains in place as the stone is installed.

MnDOT Specification 2511 Part C provides detailed guidance for placement of riprap stone, including Random Riprap (Part C.1) and Hand-Placed Riprap (Part C.2). Further, Part D describes proper procedures for grouting riprap, and Part E provides guidance on required thickness when placing riprap.

MnDOT Specification 2511.4 prescribes “method of measurement” related to riprap. Part A (Riprap) states: “If measuring riprap of each type and class by volume, the Engineer will calculate the volume based on the actual surface dimensions as staked and the thickness shown on the plans or specified in the special provisions. If measuring riprap of each type and class by mass, the Engineer will calculate the mass based on scale tickets of materials delivered and placed within the staked areas.” Further, Part B (Filter Materials) states: “If measuring filter materials by weight, the Engineer will calculate the weight based on scale tickets of material delivered and placed within the staked areas. If measuring filter materials by volume, the Engineer will calculate the volume based on the actual surface dimensions as staked and the thickness as shown on the plans. The Engineer will measure geotextile filter material by area based on the actual surface dimensions as staked, with no allowance for overlaps or seams.”

Basis of payment related to riprap.

MnDOT Specification 2511.5 prescribes “basis of payment” related to riprap, stating: “The contract unit price for riprap of each type and class includes the cost of providing the materials, excavating and preparing the foundations, and placing the riprap stone, grouting, and filter materials as required by the contract. The Department will pay for filter materials of the type specified, if included in the contract.” Further, 2511.5 states that payment by the Department for riprap and filter material will be based on the following schedule:

The relevant specifications noted above in 2511.4 (Method of Measurement) and 2511.5 (Basis of Payment) are important when considering cost implications of these practices, discussed further below.

Riprap material

MnDOT Specifications 3601 provides materials specifications for “riprap material,” including (3601.1) “stone and filter layer material for use in random or hand-placed riprap, gabion, and revet mattress construction.” Specification 3601.2 Part A.1 provides specifications related to quality of riprap stone, stating: “Provide stone of the quality approved by the Department and meeting the following requirements:

• Each individual stone has at least one fractured face.
• Is free of soil or other debris before placement.
• Contains less than 10 percent of the following by weight:
  • Stones with defects that could cause rapid or excessive deterioration or degradation during service, such as cracks or seams; and
  • Stones with a width or thickness less than 30 percent of the length.
• For carbonate quarry/bedrock material used in total or in part for riprap, the portion of the insoluble residue passing the #200 sieve is no greater than 10 percent.
• Use 100 percent virgin materials for riprap and granular filter.

To determine suitable quality of stone, [MnDOT] may consider the results of laboratory tests, the performance of the stone under natural exposure conditions, the performance of the riprap from the same or similar geological formations or deposits, or other tests or criteria.” MnDOT Specification 3601 Part A.2.a provides guidance for random riprap by referring the user to Table 3601-1, which outlines gradation requirements for random riprap.

MnDOT standard riprap gradations
Link to this table

Weight		Size		Approximate Percent of Total Weight Smaller than Given Weight
lb	kg	in	mm	Riprap Class
				I	II	III	IV	V
2,000	900	30	750	-	-	-	-	100
1,000	450	24	600	-	-	-	100	-
650	300	21	525	-	-	-	-	75
400	180	18	450	-	-	100	-	-
250	113	15	375	-	-	-	75	50
120	55	12	300	-	100	75	50	-
50	22	9	225	-	75	50	-	-
15	7	6	150	100	50	-	-	10
5	2	4	100	-	-	-	10	-
2	1	3	75	50	-	10	-	-
-	-	2	50	-	10	-	-	-
-	-	1	25	10	-	-	-	-

MnDOT Specification 3601 Part A.2.b describes requirements for hand-placed riprap, stating: “Provide individual stones with a weight of at least 50 lb. The Department will not require a minimum weight for smaller stones required for filling in the narrow openings between individual stones (chinking).”

MnDOT Specification 3601 Part B provides guidance for filter material to be used in conjunction with riprap. Per Part B.1.a, granular filter material to be used under Class I random riprap shall meet the Class 5 gradation requirements of Table 3138-3], and granular filter material to be used under other riprap shall meet the requirements of Table 3601-2.

MnDOT specifications for granular filter material under Class I random riprap
Link to this table

Granular Filter Material Under Class I Random Riprap
Sieve Size	Percent Passing by Weight
2 inch	-
1.5 inch	100
1 inch	-
3/4 inch	70-100
3/8 inch	45-90
No. 4	35-80
No. 10	20-65
No. 40	10-35
No. 200	3-10

(Source: adapted from MnDOT (2018) Table 3138-3)

MnDOT specifications for granular filter material under all other riprap
Link to this table

Granular Filter Material Under All Other Riprap
Sieve Size	Percent Passing by Weight
6 inch	100
3 inch	75-95
1 inch	35-75
No. 4	10-40
No. 10	5-25
No. 40	0-10
No. 200	0-5

(Source: adapted from MnDOT (2018)

Per MnDOT Specification 3601 Part B.2, geotextile filter to be used with riprap shall meet the requirements of Specification 3733. MnDOT Specification 3733.1 notes the following regarding use of geotextiles under riprap:

• Use Type 3 under Class I and Class II random riprap
• Use Type 4 under Class III and Class IV random riprap and hand-placed riprap on slopes no steeper than 3:1, horizontal to vertical
• Use Type 7 under Class III and Class IV random riprap on slopes steeper than 3:1, horizontal to vertical, and under Class V random riprap

Geotextile Types 3 and 4 must meet the following specifications, per Specification 3733.2.B:

MnDOT specifications for geotextile under riprap.
Link to this table

Geotextile Properties for Use Under Riprap
Geotextile Property	Test Method (ASTM) and Units	Type 3 (under Class I and Class II random riprap) (a)	Type 4 (under Class III and Class IV random riprap and hand-placed riprap, slopes up to 3:1) (a)	Type 7 (under Class III and Class IV random riprap, slopes > 3:1) (a)(b)
B1 Grab Tensile Strength minimum, each principal direction	D4632 lb	100	200	300
B2 Elongation minimum, each principal direction	D4632 percent	50	50	50
B3 Seam Breaking Strength minimum (c)	D4632 lb	90	180	270
B4 Apparent Opening Size (AOS) maximum (d)	D4751 U.S. Std. sieve size	50	50	50
B5 Permittivity minimum (e)	D4491 falling head sec−1	0.5	0.5	0.5
B6 Puncture strength minimum	D6241 lb	-	-	-
B7 Wide Width Strip Tensile Strength minimum each principal direction	D4595 lb/ft	-	-	-

(a) Minimum Average Roll Values (MARV) based on average of at least three tests per swatch. (b) Needle-punched nonwoven. Do not use thermally bonded (heat-set) fabric. (c) Adhere to this requirement if the contract requires or allows seams. Strength specifications apply to factory and field seams. Use thread for sewing that has strength of at least 25 lb . Sew seams with a Federal Type 401 stitch using a two-spool sewing machine, and install seams facing upward. For seaming with adhesives, see the Approved/Qualified Products List available at the Department’s website. (d) For U.S. sieve sizes, the AOS Number must be equal to or greater than the number specified. (e) Permittivity: P = K/L, where K = fabric permeability and L = fabric thickness.

(Source: adapted from MnDOT (2018)

Inspection and maintenance

In general, riprap should be inspected after high flows to ensure deficiencies are identified and corrected early. Recommended inspection and maintenance activities for riprap include the following:

• Confirm that the riprap type and dimensions are consistent with the design specifications.
• Inspect the riprap for dislodged stones for filter materials.
• Replace rock or other components that have become dislodged.
• Immediately repair damages to geotextile fabric.
• Inspect riprap systems for signs of erosion and scour or sediment accumulation.
• Remove accumulated material including sediment, trash, and woody debris from riprap.
• If riprap stones continue to wash away, replace them with larger stones.

Costs

Riprap costs are typically much higher than other forms of erosion control. The following table summarizes estimated BMP costs based on MnDOT data summarizing average bid prices for awarded projects in 2017.

Unit costs related to riprap
Link to this table

Bid Item	Item Description	Units	Average Price
2511501/00010	Random riprap Class Special	cubic yard	$39.00
2511501/00011	Random riprap Class I	cubic yard	$64.10
2511501/00012	Random riprap Class II	cubic yard	$74.82
		ton	$38.20
2511501/00013	Random riprap Class III	cubic yard	$66.12
		ton	$51.50
2511501/00014	Random riprap Class IV	cubic yard	$65.27
		ton	$47.09
2511501/00015	Random riprap Class V	cubic yard	$71.64
2511505/00010	Hand-placed riprap	cubic yard	$750.00
2511604/00200	Articular concrete riprap	square yard	$75.51
2511607/00011	Random riprap special	cubic yard	$47.33
2511607/00012	Random riprap (matrix)	cubic yard	$465.25
2511607/00120	Install Random riprap	cubic yard	$47.00

(Source: MnDOT 2017 Average Bid Prices)

Reference materials

Except where more stringent requirements are presented in this guidance, BMPs shall comply with MnDOT and other state requirements. Primary design references include:

• MnDOT Erosion Control Handbook II
• 2018 Minnesota NPDES/SDS Construction Stormwater General Permit
• MnDOT Standard Specifications for Construction

The following is a list of additional resources that are not specific to Minnesota:

• Iowa Statewide Urban Design and Specification (SUDAS) Design Manual (2013) (Chapter 7E-10)
• Massachusetts Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines for Urban and Suburban Areas: A Guide for Planners, Designers, and Municipal Officials (2003)
• New York State Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control (2016)

Related pages

• Stabilization practices

• Erosion prevention practices
  • Erosion prevention practices - temporary seeding and stabilization
  • Erosion prevention practices - natural and synthetic mulches
  • Erosion prevention practices - tackifiers and soil stabilizers
  • Erosion prevention practices - erosion control blankets and anchoring devices
  • Erosion prevention practices - turf reinforcement mats
  • Erosion prevention practices - Riprap
• Sediment control practices
  • Sediment control practices - Vehicle tracking BMPs
  • Sediment control practices - Perimeter controls for disturbed areas
  • Sediment control practices - Check dams (ditch checks, ditch dikes)
  • Sediment control practices - Diversion barrier controls (cofferdams/temporary dikes)
  • Sediment control practices - Storm drain inlet protection
  • Sediment control practices - Outlet energy dissipation
  • Sediment control practices - Sediment traps and basins
  • Sediment control practices - Stabilized earth/soil berm
  • Construction stormwater treatment - dewatering, including chemical treatment and sediment filtration
  • Construction stormwater best management practice – buffer zones
• Other practices
  • Construction stormwater practices - temporary stream crossing
  • Construction stormwater practices - diversion and working in the dry
  • Construction stormwater treatment - BMP removal after final stabilization

• General principles for erosion prevention and sediment control at construction sites in Minnesota
• Construction stormwater photo gallery