m
m
 
(14 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<center><font size=3>'''This table shows structural BMP use in Karst settings.'''</font size><br>
+
<font size=3>'''Stormwater BMP selection in karst settings. Sources Karst Working Group, 2009; Minnesota Stormwater Wiki; Tennessee Permanent Stormwater Management and Design Guidance.'''</font size><br>
Link to this [[Structural BMP use in karst settings|table]]</center>
+
Link to this [[Structural BMP use in karst settings|table]]
 
<table class="sortable">
 
<table class="sortable">
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
 
<th>'''BMP'''</th>
 
<th>'''BMP'''</th>
 +
<th>Suitability in karst regions</th>
 
<th>'''Karst considerations'''</th>
 
<th>'''Karst considerations'''</th>
 +
<th>[https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=MN_CSW_Permit_Section_16_Infiltration_Systems Construction stormwater permit restriction<sup>1</sup>]</th>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
<td>Bioretention</td>
+
<td>Impervious area disconnect</td>
<td>If containment levels remain high after treatment or if water inflow presents a threat, an underdrain and-or use of a synthetic or other impermeable membrane liner should be considered to seal the bottom of the system.</td>
+
<td>Preferred</td>
 +
<td>
 +
*Strongly recommended for most residential lots less than 6,000 square feet.
 +
*Discharge point from the disconnect should extend at least 15 feet from any building foundation.
 +
</td>
 +
<td>No</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>Bioretention with underdrain (biofiltration)</td>
 +
<td>Preferred</td>
 +
<td>
 +
*Requires 3 foot minimum separation distance between practice bottom and bedrock. If this is not possible, an underdrain should be used to convey the water away.
 +
*It’s recommended that the drainage area to an individual bioretention BMP be kept less than 20,000 square feet.
 +
*Larger designs that rely on exfiltration of treated runoff into the soils below are not recommended.
 +
</td>
 +
<td>No</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>Rain tank/cistern</td>
 +
<td>Preferred</td>
 +
<td>
 +
*Above ground tanks are preferred to below ground.
 +
*Overflow of tank should extend at least 15 feet from building foundation.
 +
</td>
 +
<td>No</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>Rooftop disconnect</td>
 +
<td>Preferred</td>
 +
<td>
 +
*15 feet foundation set back.
 +
*Runoff should be spread diffusely across landscape.
 +
</td>
 +
<td>No</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>Green roofs</td>
 +
<td>Preferred</td>
 +
<td>
 +
*Runoff should be spread diffusely across landscape.</td>
 +
<td>No</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>Dry swale or grassed channel</td>
 +
<td>Preferred</td>
 +
<td>
 +
*Line with underdrains.
 +
*Incorporate compost amendments into the bottom of the channel to improve runoff reduction for vegetative uptake, and transpiration.
 +
*Do not incorporate check dams unless the swale or channel incorporates an underdrain.  Otherwise small areas of infiltration would develop in the zones upgradient of the check dam where the water is captured without adequate outlet.
 +
{{alert|If the CSW permit applies, Section 16.20 prohibits permittees from constructing infiltration systems in areas within 1,000 feet upgradient or 100 feet downgradient of active karst|alert-danger}}
 +
</td>
 +
<td>Yes if designed for infiltration</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
 
<td>Media filter</td>
 
<td>Media filter</td>
<td>If containment levels remain high after treatment or if water inflow presents a threat, an underdrain and-or use of a synthetic or other impermeable membrane liner should be considered to seal the bottom of the system.</td>
+
<td>Preferred</td>
 +
<td>
 +
*Recommended practice in areas of shallow bedrock and soil.</td>
 +
<td>No</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
 
<td>Vegetative filter</td>
 
<td>Vegetative filter</td>
 +
<td>Preferred</td>
 +
<td>
 +
*Recommended practice in areas of shallow bedrock and soil.</td>
 +
<td>No</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>Soil compost amendment</td>
 +
<td>Adequate</td>
 +
<td></td>
 +
<td>No</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>Small scale infiltration/micro-bioinfiltration</td>
 +
<td>Adequate</td>
 
<td>
 
<td>
*Avoid water ponding
+
*Create multiple small sized infiltration BMPs to infiltrate impervious areas of 250 to 2,500 square feet.
*Should be engineered to avoid channel erosion and optimize pollutant removal</td>
+
*Not recommended for sites identified as a stormwater hotspot.
 +
{{alert|If the CSW permit applies, Section 16.20 prohibits permittees from constructing infiltration systems in areas within 1,000 feet upgradient or 100 feet downgradient of active karst|alert-danger}}
 +
</td>
 +
<td>Yes</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>Permeable pavement</td>
 +
<td>Adequate</td>
 +
<td>{{alert|If the CSW permit applies, Section 16.20 prohibits permittees from constructing infiltration systems in areas within 1,000 feet upgradient or 100 feet downgradient of active karst|alert-danger}}</td>
 +
<td>Yes if designed for infiltration (no underdrain)</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
 
<td>Infiltration trench or basin</td>
 
<td>Infiltration trench or basin</td>
 +
<td>Adequate</td>
 
<td>
 
<td>
*Not typically recommended in active karst areas due to sinkhole formation and inadequate treatment by a scarcity of underlying soils
+
*Surface area to depth ratios of practices may need to be larger than typical basin designs to minimize depth of the BMP.
*If used, should have supporting geotechnical investigations and calculations
+
*Confirm suitability  with supporting geotechnical investigations and calculations.
*Pre-treatment should be extensive to limit risk of groundwater contamination
+
*Not recommended for sites identified as a stormwater hotspot.
*Local review authority should be consulted for approval</td>
+
*Incorporate pre-treatment to limit risk of groundwater contamination in the event of future failure of the BMP associated with development of a karst feature. Local review authority should be consulted for approval.
 +
{{alert|If the CSW permit applies, Section 16.20 prohibits permittees from constructing infiltration systems in areas within 1,000 feet upgradient or 100 feet downgradient of active karst|alert-danger}}
 +
</td>
 +
<td>Yes</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
<td>Stormwater ponds</td>
+
<td>Constructed wetlands</td>
 +
<td>Adequate</td>
 +
<td>
 +
*Requires larger surface area to drainage area ratios to limit the depth of the wetland.
 +
*Bedrock should act like a liner and help to maintain a permanent pool, unless fracture zone is present.
 +
*Consider using [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Liners_for_stormwater_management liner and liner cells].
 +
{{alert|If the CSW permit applies, liners are required in areas of active karst|alert-danger}}
 +
</td>
 +
<td>No</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>Dry extended detention (ED) ponds and wet ponds</td>
 +
<td>Adequate</td>
 
<td>
 
<td>
*Should be constructed with a synthetic or clay liner in active karst areas
+
*Requires larger surface area to drainage area ratios to limit the depth of the basin or pond. If analysis shows that the soils can support the weight of a pond then a [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Liners_for_stormwater_management liner] should be used to prevent infiltration
*Should have supporting geotechnical investigations and calculations
+
{{alert|If the CSW permit applies, liners are required in areas of active karst|alert-danger}}</td>
*Should be limited to a maximum ponding depth (e.g. < 10 feet)</td>
+
<td>No</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
<td>Constructed wetlands</td>
+
<td>Wet swale</td>
 +
<td>Discouraged</td>
 +
<td>Not feasible</td>
 +
<td>No</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>Large scale infiltration</td>
 +
<td>Discouraged</td>
 
<td>
 
<td>
*Should be constructed with a synthetic or clay liner in active karst areas
+
*Use small scale infiltration practices instead.
*Should have supporting geotechnical investigations and calculations
+
{{alert|If the CSW permit applies, Section 16.20 prohibits permittees from constructing infiltration systems in areas within 1,000 feet upgradient or 100 feet downgradient of active karst|alert-danger}}
*Should be limited to a maximum ponding depth (e.g. < 10 feet)</td>
+
</td>
 +
<td>Yes</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
</table>
 
</table>
[[category:table]]
+
<font size=1><sup>1</sup>[https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=MN_CSW_Permit_Section_16_Infiltration_Systems#16.20 Section 16.20 of the CSW Permit] prohibits prohibits permittees from constructing infiltration systems in areas within 1,000 feet upgradient or 100 feet downgradient of [[Karst|active karst features]].</font size>
 +
 +
<noinclude>
 +
[[Category:Level 3 - General information, reference, tables, images, and archives/Tables/Hydrology and geology]]
 +
</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 18:23, 13 December 2022

Stormwater BMP selection in karst settings. Sources Karst Working Group, 2009; Minnesota Stormwater Wiki; Tennessee Permanent Stormwater Management and Design Guidance.
Link to this table

BMP Suitability in karst regions Karst considerations Construction stormwater permit restriction1
Impervious area disconnect Preferred
  • Strongly recommended for most residential lots less than 6,000 square feet.
  • Discharge point from the disconnect should extend at least 15 feet from any building foundation.
No
Bioretention with underdrain (biofiltration) Preferred
  • Requires 3 foot minimum separation distance between practice bottom and bedrock. If this is not possible, an underdrain should be used to convey the water away.
  • It’s recommended that the drainage area to an individual bioretention BMP be kept less than 20,000 square feet.
  • Larger designs that rely on exfiltration of treated runoff into the soils below are not recommended.
No
Rain tank/cistern Preferred
  • Above ground tanks are preferred to below ground.
  • Overflow of tank should extend at least 15 feet from building foundation.
No
Rooftop disconnect Preferred
  • 15 feet foundation set back.
  • Runoff should be spread diffusely across landscape.
No
Green roofs Preferred
  • Runoff should be spread diffusely across landscape.
No
Dry swale or grassed channel Preferred
  • Line with underdrains.
  • Incorporate compost amendments into the bottom of the channel to improve runoff reduction for vegetative uptake, and transpiration.
  • Do not incorporate check dams unless the swale or channel incorporates an underdrain. Otherwise small areas of infiltration would develop in the zones upgradient of the check dam where the water is captured without adequate outlet.
Warning: If the CSW permit applies, Section 16.20 prohibits permittees from constructing infiltration systems in areas within 1,000 feet upgradient or 100 feet downgradient of active karst
Yes if designed for infiltration
Media filter Preferred
  • Recommended practice in areas of shallow bedrock and soil.
No
Vegetative filter Preferred
  • Recommended practice in areas of shallow bedrock and soil.
No
Soil compost amendment Adequate No
Small scale infiltration/micro-bioinfiltration Adequate
  • Create multiple small sized infiltration BMPs to infiltrate impervious areas of 250 to 2,500 square feet.
  • Not recommended for sites identified as a stormwater hotspot.
Warning: If the CSW permit applies, Section 16.20 prohibits permittees from constructing infiltration systems in areas within 1,000 feet upgradient or 100 feet downgradient of active karst
Yes
Permeable pavement Adequate
Warning: If the CSW permit applies, Section 16.20 prohibits permittees from constructing infiltration systems in areas within 1,000 feet upgradient or 100 feet downgradient of active karst
Yes if designed for infiltration (no underdrain)
Infiltration trench or basin Adequate
  • Surface area to depth ratios of practices may need to be larger than typical basin designs to minimize depth of the BMP.
  • Confirm suitability with supporting geotechnical investigations and calculations.
  • Not recommended for sites identified as a stormwater hotspot.
  • Incorporate pre-treatment to limit risk of groundwater contamination in the event of future failure of the BMP associated with development of a karst feature. Local review authority should be consulted for approval.
Warning: If the CSW permit applies, Section 16.20 prohibits permittees from constructing infiltration systems in areas within 1,000 feet upgradient or 100 feet downgradient of active karst
Yes
Constructed wetlands Adequate
  • Requires larger surface area to drainage area ratios to limit the depth of the wetland.
  • Bedrock should act like a liner and help to maintain a permanent pool, unless fracture zone is present.
  • Consider using liner and liner cells.
Warning: If the CSW permit applies, liners are required in areas of active karst
No
Dry extended detention (ED) ponds and wet ponds Adequate
  • Requires larger surface area to drainage area ratios to limit the depth of the basin or pond. If analysis shows that the soils can support the weight of a pond then a liner should be used to prevent infiltration
Warning: If the CSW permit applies, liners are required in areas of active karst
No
Wet swale Discouraged Not feasible No
Large scale infiltration Discouraged
  • Use small scale infiltration practices instead.
Warning: If the CSW permit applies, Section 16.20 prohibits permittees from constructing infiltration systems in areas within 1,000 feet upgradient or 100 feet downgradient of active karst
Yes

1Section 16.20 of the CSW Permit prohibits prohibits permittees from constructing infiltration systems in areas within 1,000 feet upgradient or 100 feet downgradient of active karst features.

This page was last edited on 13 December 2022, at 18:23.