(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 116: | Line 116: | ||
=====Measured ET (ET<sub>mea</sub>)===== | =====Measured ET (ET<sub>mea</sub>)===== | ||
− | Measured ET (ET<sub>mea</sub>) is the amount of water lost to ET as measured using available data. An average daily pan evaporation rate was estimated using previous measurements collected at the University of Minnesota Southwest Experiment Station at Lamberton, Minnesota (Source: [ | + | Measured ET (ET<sub>mea</sub>) is the amount of water lost to ET as measured using available data. An average daily pan evaporation rate was estimated using previous measurements collected at the University of Minnesota Southwest Experiment Station at Lamberton, Minnesota (Source: [https://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/109293 Climate of Minnesota Part XII- The Hydrologic Cycle and Soil Water], 1979). A rate of 0.2 inches per day was selected, as this is an intermediate value between the summertime maximum rate and the lowest rates in October. Analysis of rainfall data indicates that a typical time period between precipitation events is 72 hours (3 days) in Minnesota. Therefore, a 3 day period is used to calculate the ET<sub>mea</sub>. A factor of 0.5 is also applied to convert the pan evaporation rate to ET<sub>mea</sub>. The ET<sub>mea</sub> volume thus equals the media surface area (L<sub>C</sub> * W<sub>B</sub>) in square feet times the average daily ET rate in inches per day times 3 days. |
<math>ET_{mea} = L_C * W_B * 0.2 in/day * 0.5 *3 days / (12 in/ft) = 0.025 (L_C * W_B) </math> | <math>ET_{mea} = L_C * W_B * 0.2 in/day * 0.5 *3 days / (12 in/ft) = 0.025 (L_C * W_B) </math> | ||
Line 136: | Line 136: | ||
=====Particulate phosphorus===== | =====Particulate phosphorus===== | ||
− | The particulate phosphorus credit given for non-volume reduction treatment is either 0 percent or | + | The particulate phosphorus credit given for non-volume reduction treatment is either 0 percent or 55 percent depending on the media mix used and its P content. |
− | *If [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Construction_specifications_for_bioretention#Materials_specifications_-_filter_media Media Mix] C or D is used, or if a media mix other than C or D is used and the soil phosphorus as measured using the [http://soiltesting.tamu.edu/files/mehlich3.pdf Mehlich 3 test] or a [[Design_criteria_for_bioretention#Notes_about_soil_phosphorus_testing:_applicability_and_interpretation|suitable alternative test]] is 30 milligrams per kilogram or less, then the annual particulate phosphorus reduction credit is | + | *If [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Construction_specifications_for_bioretention#Materials_specifications_-_filter_media Media Mix] C or D is used, or if a media mix other than C or D is used and the soil phosphorus as measured using the [http://soiltesting.tamu.edu/files/mehlich3.pdf Mehlich 3 test] or a [[Design_criteria_for_bioretention#Notes_about_soil_phosphorus_testing:_applicability_and_interpretation|suitable alternative test]] is 30 milligrams per kilogram or less, then the annual particulate phosphorus reduction credit is 55 percent of the filtered water volume. |
*If a media mix other than C or D is used and the soil phosphorus has not been determined or is greater than 30 milligrams per kilogram as measured using the [http://soiltesting.tamu.edu/files/mehlich3.pdf Mehlich 3 test] or a [[Design_criteria_for_bioretention#Notes_about_soil_phosphorus_testing:_applicability_and_interpretation|suitable alternative test]], then the annual particulate phosphorus reduction credit is 0 percent of the filtered water volume. | *If a media mix other than C or D is used and the soil phosphorus has not been determined or is greater than 30 milligrams per kilogram as measured using the [http://soiltesting.tamu.edu/files/mehlich3.pdf Mehlich 3 test] or a [[Design_criteria_for_bioretention#Notes_about_soil_phosphorus_testing:_applicability_and_interpretation|suitable alternative test]], then the annual particulate phosphorus reduction credit is 0 percent of the filtered water volume. | ||
*An additional annual particulate phosphorus credit of 40 percent of the filtered water volume may be received if [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Soil_amendments_to_enhance_phosphorus_sorption phosphorus-sorbing amendments] are used. Acceptable amendments include the following: | *An additional annual particulate phosphorus credit of 40 percent of the filtered water volume may be received if [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Soil_amendments_to_enhance_phosphorus_sorption phosphorus-sorbing amendments] are used. Acceptable amendments include the following: | ||
Line 146: | Line 146: | ||
NOTE: If the Olsen test is used to determine P content of the media mix, a [[Design_criteria_for_bioretention#Notes_about_soil_phosphorus_testing:_applicability_and_interpretation|simple conversion]] is required. | NOTE: If the Olsen test is used to determine P content of the media mix, a [[Design_criteria_for_bioretention#Notes_about_soil_phosphorus_testing:_applicability_and_interpretation|simple conversion]] is required. | ||
+ | |||
=====Dissolved phosphorus===== | =====Dissolved phosphorus===== | ||
The dissolved phosphorus credit given for non-volume reduction treatment is between 0 percent and 60 percent depending on the media mix, the media P content, and if the media was amended to attenuate phosphorus. | The dissolved phosphorus credit given for non-volume reduction treatment is between 0 percent and 60 percent depending on the media mix, the media P content, and if the media was amended to attenuate phosphorus. | ||
Line 209: | Line 210: | ||
<noinclude> | <noinclude> | ||
− | [[Category:MIDS | + | [[Category:Level 3 - Models and modeling/Specific models/MIDS Calculator]] |
− | [[Category: | + | [[Category:Level 3 - Best management practices/Structural practices/Dry swale]] |
+ | [[Category:Level 3 - Best management practices/Structural practices/Step pool]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Level 3 - Best management practices/Structural practices/Wet swale]] | ||
</noinclude> | </noinclude> |
A swale main channel with an underdrain behaves similarly to a bioretention BMP with an underdrain. If the underdrain is not elevated above the native soils, then most of the stormwater captured by the BMP is lost to the underdrain, with some volume reduction achieved through infiltration below the underdrain. Volume retention also occurs by evapotranspiration (ET) through the vegetation in the swale. For systems with an elevated underdrain, volume retention is achieved through infiltration of water stored in the pore spaces of engineered media between the invert of an elevated underdrain and the native soils. If runoff to the main channel flows over a side slope through sheet flow, then a swale side slope BMP should be used in combination with the swale main channel BMP in the MIDS calculator. All pollutants in the infiltrated water are credited as being reduced. A portion of pollutants in the stormwater that flows through an underdrain is removed through filtration.
For a swale main channel with underdrain system, the user must input the following parameters to calculate the volume and pollutant load reductions associated with the BMP.
The Minimal Impact Design Standards (MIDS) Calculator separates side slopes and the main channel of swales into separate practices. This creates the potential for inaccurately routing water, since in reality side slopes and main channels are part of a single swale system. This page provides guidance for routing water to swales in the MIDS Calculator.
The MIDS Calculator separates swale side slopes and swale main channels into separate best management practices. This is because infiltration and pollutant retention calculations differ for the side slope and the main channel. Descriptions of modeling assumptions and calculations are found at the following links.
The primary difference between side slopes and main channels is due to increased potential for infiltration in a main channel resulting from different configurations. Specifically, infiltration in a main channel is affected by length of the swale, presence or absence of impermeable check dams, and presence or absence of engineered media. These configurations are either not available for side slopes or have limited impact on infiltration.
In reality, swale side slopes and main channels are part of a single swale practice. There are three possible configurations of swales. Configuring and routing water to them correctly is essential to correctly modeling swales.
These configurations are shown in the adjacent image.
If the following requirements for inputs into the MIDS calculator are not met, then an error message will inform the user to change the input to meet the requirement.
\(DDT_{calc} = D_U / (I_R / 12)\)
Where
If DDTcalc is greater than the user-specified required drawdown time then the user will be prompted to enter a new depth below the underdrain or infiltration rate of the native soils.
Required treatment volume, or the volume of stormwater runoff delivered to the BMP, equals the performance goal (1.1 inches or user-specified performance goal) times the impervious area draining to the BMP plus any water routed to the BMP from an upstream BMP. This stormwater is delivered to the BMP instantaneously.
The total estimated Volume reduction capacity of BMP [V] is the sum of infiltration and ET occurring in the swale main channel with underdrain, and is calculated with user-provided inputs. For this BMP, the location of the underdrain determines how the infiltration component is calculated. If the underdrain is located at the bottom of the BMP, then the infiltration credit is based on infiltration into the bottom of the BMP (Vinfb). In contrast, if the underdrain is elevated above the bottom of the BMP, then the infiltration credit is based on the volume capacity of the bioretention base (VBB) between the underdrain and the native soils. Both types of underdrain configurations can receive credit for ET in the media above the underdrain (VET).
The Volume of retention provided by BMP is the total instantaneous volume credit that can be claimed for that BMP, and is determined by comparing the Volume reduction capacity of BMP [V] to the Required treatment volume.
Even with an underdrain installed at the base of the engineered media, under saturated conditions some water will infiltrate through the bottom soils rather than pass through the underdrain. This Volume reduction from basin bottom infiltration (Vinfb) is calculated by
\(V_{Inf_b} = I_R * DDT_{calc} * W_B * L_C/(12in/ft)\)
Where
The default infiltration rate is set at 0.06 inches per hour to represent a D soil. This rate was selected because it is assumed that most of the stormwater will pass through the underdrain before it can infiltrate through the bottom of the BMP. This may be a conservative assumption if underdrains are small, spaced far apart, and the underlying soil has an infiltration rate greater than 0.06 inches per hour. Conversely, more closely spaced or larger underdrains may allow the basin to drain in less than the required drawdown time, resulting in a slight overestimation of (Vinfb). If the user specifies that an impermeable liner is present at the bottom of the BMP, then no credit is given for infiltration into the bottom soils.
If the underdrain is elevated above the bottom of the BMP, then the infiltration portion of the volume reduction credit is determined based on the volume capacity of the bioretention base existing between the underdrain and the native soils. The Volume reduction stored below the underdrain is given by
\(V = D_U * L_C * W_B * (n-FC)\)
Where
The stored water must drain within the specified drawdown time. The underlying soil controls the infiltration rate. The user must input the soil with the most restrictive hydraulic conductivity in the 5 feet directly below the basin (i.e. below the bottom of the engineered media).
In addition to the credit given for the infiltration, a swale main channel with an underdrain can achieve volume reduction through ET. The Volume reduction of BMP from ET (VET) as determined by the MIDS calculator is the smaller of two calculated values, potential ET (ETpot) and measured ET (ETmea).
Potential ET (ETpot) is equal to the amount of water stored between field capacity and the wilting point in the media above the underdrain, and is given by
\(ET_{pot} = (D_M - D_U ) * L_C * W_B * (FC - WP)\)
Where
Measured ET (ETmea) is the amount of water lost to ET as measured using available data. An average daily pan evaporation rate was estimated using previous measurements collected at the University of Minnesota Southwest Experiment Station at Lamberton, Minnesota (Source: Climate of Minnesota Part XII- The Hydrologic Cycle and Soil Water, 1979). A rate of 0.2 inches per day was selected, as this is an intermediate value between the summertime maximum rate and the lowest rates in October. Analysis of rainfall data indicates that a typical time period between precipitation events is 72 hours (3 days) in Minnesota. Therefore, a 3 day period is used to calculate the ETmea. A factor of 0.5 is also applied to convert the pan evaporation rate to ETmea. The ETmea volume thus equals the media surface area (LC * WB) in square feet times the average daily ET rate in inches per day times 3 days.
\(ET_{mea} = L_C * W_B * 0.2 in/day * 0.5 *3 days / (12 in/ft) = 0.025 (L_C * W_B) \)
The sum of the volumes lost to infiltration and to ET as calculated using the appropriate methods above gives the Volume reduction capacity of BMP [V]. The MIDS calculator compares the Volume reduction capacity of BMP [V] with the Required treatment volume, and the lesser of the two values is used to populate the Volume of retention provided by BMP. This comparison between potential and actual treatment volumes ensures that the BMP does not claim more credit than is due based on the actual amount of water routed to it. The Volume of retention provided by BMP is the actual volume credit the BMP receives toward the instantaneous performance goal. For example, if the BMP is oversized the user will only receive volume credit for the Required treatment volume routed to the BMP.
Annual volume retention is assessed by converting the instantaneous Volume reduction capacity of BMP [V] to an annual volume reduction percentage. This is accomplished through the use of performance curves developed from a range of modeling scenarios. These performance curves use the Volume reduction capacity of BMP [V], the infiltration rate of the underlying soils, the percent imperviousness of the contributing watershed area, and the size of the contributing watershed to calculate the Percent annual runoff volume retained.
Pollutant removal can be accomplished both via volume reducing and non-volume reducing processes in this BMP. Pollutant load reductions are calculated on an annual basis and are thus dependent upon the volume of water retained by the BMP through infiltration and ET and the volume of water treated by filtration in the BMP.
The first step in calculating annual pollutant load reductions is to determine the Annual retention volume provided by BMP as discussed in the Volume reduction section. All pollutants in this retained water are considered captured for a 100 percent removal. Thus, while oversizing a BMP above the Required treatment volume will not provide additional credit towards the instantaneous volume performance goal, it may provide additional annual pollutant reduction through treatment of water beyond the Required treatment volume.
Stormwater that is routed to the BMP but not infiltrated or lost through ET is assumed to flow through the filter media and out the underdrain, and is indicated by the Annual outflow volume in the BMP Summary tab. The removal rate for TSS in this filtered stormwater is set at 68 percent. The removal rates for particulate phosphorus and dissolved phosphorus in the filtered stormwater depend on the user's input to three drop-down boxes: “Planting media mix”; “Is the P content of the media less than 30 mg/kg?”; and “Is a soil amendment used to attenuate phosphorus?”.
The particulate phosphorus credit given for non-volume reduction treatment is either 0 percent or 55 percent depending on the media mix used and its P content.
NOTE: If the Olsen test is used to determine P content of the media mix, a simple conversion is required.
The dissolved phosphorus credit given for non-volume reduction treatment is between 0 percent and 60 percent depending on the media mix, the media P content, and if the media was amended to attenuate phosphorus.
\(credit = 20 * ((D_M - D_U)) / (2 ft)\)
The credit is calculated as a percent reduction with a maximum value of 20 percent for media depths above the underdrain greater than 2 feet. If the media depth above the underdrain is less than 2 feet the credit is reduced equivalently.
Annual removal rates of particulate phosphorus and dissolved phosphorus in filtered stormwater are summarized in the following table.
NOTE: The user can modify event mean concentrations (EMCs) on the Site Information tab in the calculator. Default concentrations are 54.5 milligrams per liter for total suspended solids (TSS) and 0.3 milligrams per liter for total phosphorus (particulate plus dissolved). The calculator will notify the user if the default is changed. Changing the default EMC will result in changes to the total pounds of pollutant reduced.
Overflow from a swale main channel with an underdrain can be routed to any other BMP except for a green roof, a swale side slope, or any BMP in a stormwater treatment sequence that would cause stormwater to be rerouted back to the swale main channel already in that sequence. All BMPs can be routed to the swale main channel with an underdrain.
The following general assumption applies in calculating the credits for a swale main channel with an underdrain. If this assumption is not followed the volume and pollutant reduction credits cannot be applied.
This page was last edited on 29 January 2023, at 13:36.