Difference between revisions of "Fructification scoring system"
m |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | <Font size=3>'''Scoring system for fructification. ( | + | <Font size=3>'''Scoring system for fructification. (International Co-operative Programme on Assessment and Monitoring of Air Pollution Effects on Forests (ICP Forests, 2010))'''</font size><br> |
Link to this [[Fructification scoring system|table]]. | Link to this [[Fructification scoring system|table]]. | ||
Revision as of 15:56, 9 July 2014
Scoring system for fructification. (International Co-operative Programme on Assessment and Monitoring of Air Pollution Effects on Forests (ICP Forests, 2010))
Link to this table.
| Score and class | Definition | Remark |
|---|---|---|
| Class 1.1: Absent | Fructification is absent or inconsiderable | Even reasonably lengthy observation of the crown with binoculars yields no signs of fruiting |
| Class 1.2: Scarce | Sporadic occurrence of fruiting | Not noticeable at first sight. It must be looked for on purpose with binoculars. |
| Class 2: Common | Fructification is such that it can be observed with the naked eye | The appearance of the tree is influenced but not dominated by fructification |
| Class 3: Abundant | Fructification is obvious and immediately meets the eye | Fruiting determines the tree's appearance |