Difference between revisions of "Crown distance scoring system"
(Created page with "<Font size=3>'''Scoring system for crown distance. (Eichhorn and Roskams, 2013)'''</font size><br> Link to this table. <table class="sortabl...") |
m |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
| − | <td>5 | + | <td>5</td> |
<td>Distant</td> | <td>Distant</td> | ||
<td>Gap between crowns from two-thirds up to one whole of average crown diameter</td> | <td>Gap between crowns from two-thirds up to one whole of average crown diameter</td> | ||
Revision as of 13:25, 9 July 2014
Scoring system for crown distance. (Eichhorn and Roskams, 2013)
Link to this table.
| Score | Class | Definition |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cramped | Canopies overlap |
| 2 | Closed | Crowns touch one another |
| 3 | Loose spread | Gap between crowns up to one-third of average crown diameter |
| 4 | Spread | Gap between crowns up to two-thirds of average crown diameter |
| 5 | Distant | Gap between crowns from two-thirds up to one whole of average crown diameter |
| 6 | Very distant | Gap between crowns > 1/1 of average crown diameter |
It is recommended to start with the tree standing closest to the sample tree in a clockwise procedure, score values are to averaged. Dead trees are taken into account as long as they are in the crown condition sample. Calculation: (Score 1 + Score 2 + Score 3 + Score 4)/4=CDRD_N</fontsize>