m
m
Line 30: Line 30:
 
</table>
 
</table>
 
<font size=1><sup>1</sup> Low: < 30%; Medium: 30 to 65%; High: >65%<br>
 
<font size=1><sup>1</sup> Low: < 30%; Medium: 30 to 65%; High: >65%<br>
<sup>2</sup>[http://bmpdatabase.org/Docs/2012%20Water%20Quality%20Analysis%20Addendum/BMP%20Database%20Categorical_SummaryAddendumReport_Final.pdf International Stormwater Database], (2012)<br>
+
<sup>2</sup> [http://bmpdatabase.org/Docs/2012%20Water%20Quality%20Analysis%20Addendum/BMP%20Database%20Categorical_SummaryAddendumReport_Final.pdf International Stormwater Database], (2012)<br>
<sup>3</sup>[http://www.creditvalleyca.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/investigating-stormwater-hydrocarbon-fate-and-biodegradation-in-bioretentionareas.pdf LeFevre], (2012)
+
<sup>3</sup> [http://www.creditvalleyca.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/investigating-stormwater-hydrocarbon-fate-and-biodegradation-in-bioretentionareas.pdf LeFevre], (2012)
 
</font size>
 
</font size>
  

Revision as of 14:22, 18 February 2015

Relative pollutant reduction from biofiltration systems for metals, nitrogen, bacteria, and organics.
Link to this table

Pollutant Constituent Treatment capabilities1
Metals2 Cadmium, Chromium, Copper, Zinc, Lead High
Nitrogen2 Total nitrogen, Total Kjeldahl nitrogen Low/medium
Bacteria2 Fecal coliform, e. coli High
Organics3 High

1 Low: < 30%; Medium: 30 to 65%; High: >65%
2 International Stormwater Database, (2012)
3 LeFevre, (2012)