Difference between revisions of "Comparison of materials used for rainwater harvesting systems"
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
<td>●●●●○</td> | <td>●●●●○</td> | ||
<td>●●○○○</td> | <td>●●○○○</td> | ||
| − | <td> | + | <td>●●●●○</td> |
| − | <td> | + | <td>5,000 to 30,000</td> |
| − | |||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Revision as of 21:17, 15 August 2016
Link to this table
| Material | Cost low - high | Installation hard - easy | Longevity short - long | Durability low - high | Maintenance Access hard - easy | Best Use Capacity (gallons) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Underground | FiberglassX | 💲💲💲💲💲 | ●●●○○ | ●●●●○ | ●●○○○ | ●●●●○ | 5,000 to 30,000 |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |