Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
*Vibration methods: An ultrasonic probe immersed in water containing soil aggregates vibrates at different vibration amplitudes. This method may represent stability under tillage conditions. | *Vibration methods: An ultrasonic probe immersed in water containing soil aggregates vibrates at different vibration amplitudes. This method may represent stability under tillage conditions. | ||
− | ===Vegetative growth - | + | ===Vegetative growth - soil structure=== |
− | |||
===Vegetative growth - plant roots=== | ===Vegetative growth - plant roots=== |
Indicators for determining soil health | ||||
Indicator | Vegetative growth | Soil biotic function | Soil hydrologic function | Soil erosion potential |
Compaction/bulk density | Yes | Yes | Yes | If surface compacted |
Water stable aggregates | Yes | |||
Soil nutrient status | Yes | |||
Soil structure | Yes | |||
Plant roots | Yes |
Soil health is an assessment of how well soil performs all of its functions now and how those functions are being preserved for future use. The assessment of soil health depends on the desired functions of the soil. In agricultural applications, for example, soil health is determined by assessing properties that affect plant growth, such nutrient status, pH, and bulk density.
For stormwater applications, soil health can be assessed for the following functions.
Each of these is discussed below.
The following indicators can be used to assess suitability of a soil to support plant/vegetative growth.
Importance: Soil compaction results from repeated traffic, generally from machinery, or repeated tillage at the same depth, which results in a compacted layer at the tillage depth. Compaction inhibits infiltration, gas and water movement, may impede root growth, disrupts habitat for soil biota, and affects nutrient cycling. See Soil physical properties and processes for a discussion of bulk density.
Assessment There are multiple methods for measuring bulk density and compaction (resistance). See methods for measuring and methods for measuring compaction. Recommended methods of assessment include the following.
General relationship of soil bulk density to root growth based on soil texture
Link to this table
Soil texture | Ideal bulk densities (g/cm3) | Bulk densities that may affect plantgrowth (g/cm3) | Bulk densities that restrict root growth (g/cm3) |
---|---|---|---|
sands, loamy sands | <1.60 | 1.69 | >1.80 |
sandy loams, loams | <1.40 | 1.63 | >1.80 |
sandy clay loams, loams, clay loams | <1.40 | 1.60 | >1.75 |
silts, silt loams | <1.30 | 1.60 | >1.75 |
silt loams, silty clay loams | <1.40 | 1.55 | >1.65 |
sandy clays, silty clays, clay loams with 35-45% clay | <1.10 | 1.49 | >1.58 |
clays (>45% clay) | <1.10 | 1.39 | >1.47 |
Importance: Stable soil aggregates, in the presence of water, is important for water and air transport, root growth, habitat for soil biota, minimizing soil erodibility, protecting soil organic matter, and nutrient cycling.
Assessment: Methods for assessing aggregate stability are somewhat qualitative and different methods do not correlate well. The method selected should simulate field processes likely to affect aggregate stability (e.g. rainfall impact, ponded (flooded) conditions, tillage). For more information about aggregate stability tests, link here.
Importance: Soils may contain concentrations of certain chemicals that are toxic to plants. Pollutants of greatest concern include metals (copper, lead, cadmium, nickel, zinc), sodium and chloride from road salt application, pesticides, and some hydrocarbons (e.g. oil, PAHs). Sites with known contamination may contain other pollutants, such as arsenic, but these soils are generally not suitable for stormwater applications without remediation.
Assessment: Risk assessments for metals concentrations in soil are generally based on human exposure, and there is limited information on toxic concentrations for different plants. Nevertheless, most urban soils do not contain chemicals at concentrations which restrict plant growth, although concentrations of these chemicals are typically greater than natural background ([1], [file:///C:/Users/franc/Downloads/environments-07-00098-v2.pdf], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]). Chemical sampling is expensive, particularly for organic contaminants. An assessment of soil contamination should therefore begin with a site investigation to identify the presence of contaminant sources or historical activities that may have resulted in soil contamination.
Regardless of the results for a site visit and site review, soil sampling is warranted for certain land use settings. The adjacent table provides a summary of potential pollutant concerns for specific land uses. If sampling is warranted, use appropriate sampling and test methods, described on this page.
Pollutants of Concern from Operations (adapted from CWP, 2005).
Link to this table.
Pollutant of concern | Vehicle operations | Waste management | Site maintenance practices | Outdoor materials | Landscaping |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nutrients | X | X | X | ||
Pesticides | X | X | |||
Solvents | X | X | |||
Fuels | X | ||||
Oil and grease | X | X | |||
Toxic chemicals | X | X | |||
Sediment | X | X | X | X | |
Road salt | X | X | |||
Bacteria | X | X | |||
Trace metals | X | X | |||
Hydrocarbons | X | X |