m |
m |
||
Line 107: | Line 107: | ||
<font size=1> | <font size=1> | ||
− | <sup>a</sup> Removal rates shown in table are a composite of five sources: [http://www.bmpdatabase.org ASCE/EPA International BMP Database]; Caraco (CWP), 2001; [https://mde.maryland.gov/programs/water/stormwatermanagementprogram/pages/stormwater_design.aspx MDE], 2000; [http://www.stormwatercenter.net/Library/STP-Pollutant-Removal-Database.pdf Winer (CWP)], 2000; and Issue Paper D [http://wwwalker.net/p8/ P8] modeling<br> | + | <sup>a</sup> Removal rates shown in table are a composite of five sources: [http://www.bmpdatabase.org ASCE/EPA International BMP Database]; Caraco (CWP), 2001; [https://mde.maryland.gov/programs/water/stormwatermanagementprogram/pages/stormwater_design.aspx MDE], 2000; [http://www.stormwatercenter.net/Library/STP-Pollutant-Removal-Database.pdf Winer (CWP)], 2000; and [https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=File:Issue_paper_D_-_unified_sizing_criteria_for_Minnesota.pdf Issue Paper D] [http://wwwalker.net/p8/ P8] modeling<br> |
<sup>b</sup> Average removal efficiency expected under [http://www.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/water/water-types-and-programs/stormwater/construction-stormwater/index.html MPCA Construction General Permit] sizing requirements<br> | <sup>b</sup> Average removal efficiency expected under [http://www.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/water/water-types-and-programs/stormwater/construction-stormwater/index.html MPCA Construction General Permit] sizing requirements<br> | ||
<sup>c</sup> Upper limit on phosphorus removal with increased sizing and design features, based on national review<br> | <sup>c</sup> Upper limit on phosphorus removal with increased sizing and design features, based on national review<br> |
General summary of comparative BMP phosphorus removal performancea,e,f
Link to this table
BMP Group | BMP Design Variation | Average TP Removal Rate (%)b | Maximum TP Removal Rate (%)c | Average Soluble P Removal Rate (%)dg |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bioretention | Underdrain | 59 see Phosphorus credits for bioretention systems with an underdrain |
80 see Phosphorus credits for bioretention systems with an underdrain |
0 see Phosphorus credits for bioretention systems with an underdrain |
Infiltration |
|
|
|
|
Filtration | Media Filter | 50 | 55 | 0 |
Vegetative Filters (dry) | 50 | 55 | 0 | |
Wet Swale | 0 | 35 | 0 | |
Infiltrationf,i | Infiltration Trench |
|
|
|
Infiltration Basin |
|
|
|
|
Stormwater Ponds | Wet Pond | 50 | 75 | 0 |
Multiple Pond | 60 | 75 | 0 | |
Stormwater Wetlands | Shallow Wetland | 40 | 45 | 0 |
Pond/Wetland | 44 | 49 | 33 |
a Removal rates shown in table are a composite of five sources: ASCE/EPA International BMP Database; Caraco (CWP), 2001; MDE, 2000; Winer (CWP), 2000; and Issue Paper D P8 modeling
b Average removal efficiency expected under MPCA Construction General Permit sizing requirements
c Upper limit on phosphorus removal with increased sizing and design features, based on national review
d Average rate of soluble phosphorus removal in literature
e See also Stormwater pollutant removal, stormwater credits
f Note that the performance numbers apply only to that portion of total flow actually being treated; it does not include any runoff that by-passes the BMP
g Note that soluble P can transfer from surface water to ground water, but this column refers only to surface water
h Note that 100% is assumed for all infiltration, but only for that portion of the flow fully treated in theinfiltration facility; by-passed runoff or runoff diverted via underdrain does not receive this level of treatment