Line 256: | Line 256: | ||
[[category:Design criteria]] | [[category:Design criteria]] | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
====If the green roof will be used to help meet water quantity of water quality goals, determine green roof size needed to meet stormwater and other goals.==== | ====If the green roof will be used to help meet water quantity of water quality goals, determine green roof size needed to meet stormwater and other goals.==== |
The information in this section is not intended to be a comprehensive green roof design manual. The main goals of this section are to provide examples of issues to consider when designing a green roof, as well as factors that will affect stormwater treatment performance.
References that address green roof design include the following.
Readers can also consult with a professional skilled in green roof design for design guidance.
A typical progression for design of a typical green roof consists of the following 12 steps.
These steps are explained in greater detail below. Adjust these steps as needed to suit your project. Some projects will not need all these steps, some projects may need additional steps, and the order may need to be changed for some projects.
Project budget will be crucial to inform project feasibility and design. Design decisions that can be greatly affected by the project budget, for example, are
The following table shows roles of various players that can be involved in green roof design and construction. Assemble a team to fit project budget and goals, and level of complexity. Depending on the project, additional roles not shown in the table may also be needed.
Project goals can include, for example:
The ideal window for planting green roofs in Minnesota is from after last frost until four weeks before first frost. Planting during extremely hot weather, above 90 F degrees or so, generally has long term negative impacts on plant health and should be avoided. Other issues to consider are discussed in the section on construction sequencing.
Evaluate factors that affect roofing design, such as, for example:
The following table describes characteristics of extensive, semi-intensive, and intensive green roofs. In summary, intensive green roofs typically have slightly higher stormwater volume benefits, but also have higher installation and maintenance costs, and require more structural capacity compared to semi-intensive and extensive green roofs.
A typical progression for design of a typical green roof consists of the following 12 steps.
These steps are explained in greater detail below. Adjust these steps as needed to suit your project. Some projects will not need all these steps, some projects may need additional steps, and the order may need to be changed for some projects.
Project budget will be crucial to inform project feasibility and design. Design decisions that can be greatly affected by the project budget, for example, are
The following table shows roles of various players that can be involved in green roof design and construction. Assemble a team to fit project budget and goals, and level of complexity. Depending on the project, additional roles not shown in the table may also be needed.
Project goals can include, for example:
The ideal window for planting green roofs in Minnesota is from after last frost until four weeks before first frost. Planting during extremely hot weather, above 90 F degrees or so, generally has long term negative impacts on plant health and should be avoided. Other issues to consider are discussed in the section on construction sequencing.
Evaluate factors that affect roofing design, such as, for example:
The following table describes characteristics of extensive, semi-intensive, and intensive green roofs. In summary, intensive green roofs typically have slightly higher stormwater volume benefits, but also have higher installation and maintenance costs, and require more structural capacity compared to semi-intensive and extensive green roofs.
Specialized reinforcement is needed to protect green roofs on slopes steeper than 2:12 from sliding. INSERT Figure 5.1: Comparison of roof slope expressed as roof pitch vs. roof slope in degrees. Pitch and degrees on same line express same roof slope. For example, a 1:12 slope is a 4 degree roof slope. Even with reinforcement, slopes should be limited. The German FLL standards, which are widely accepted in the US, recommend that green roofs should not be installed on slopes steeper than 40 degrees. The systems used to stabilize green roof installations on slopes greater than 2:12 depend on the underlying structural capacity and design, and the steepness of the roof. Examples range from geotechnical matting systems like Enkamat, to slope restraint systems, cable grids, and mechanically attached structural grids. An engineered slope stability analysis should be performed for green roofs with slopes above 2:12 (10 degrees). (provide link to http://www.zinco-greenroof.com/EN/greenroof_systems/extensive_green_roofs/pitched_35.php if we want to include an image) Several research studies have been performed on the impacts of roof slope on green roof stormwater performance, with mixed results. See, for example, Berndtsson (2010) for an overview of studies of impact of slope on stormwater performance of green roofs. While some studies found no significant correlation between green roof slope and stormwater runoff (Bengtsson 2005; Mentens et al 2006), others found greater stormwater retention at lower roof slopes (e.g. Getter et al 2007, Van Woert et al 2005.)
Examples of the magnitude of difference found in the studies that did find a correlation between green roof slope and stormwater retention are given below.
Getter et al (2007) studied 12 green roof platforms at varying slopes and varying rain intensities and found mean retention to be greatest (85.6%) at the lowest slope (2%) studied, and least (76.4%) at the greatest slope studied (25%). Retention was also greatest for light rain events (94%) and least for heavy rain events (63%).
Van Woert et al 2005 observed greatest retention (87%) at the lowest slope studied (2% slope), and least retention (65.9%) at the greatest slope studied (6.5%).
Green roofs may include vegetation free zones (hyperlink to 10 D m) designed, for example, to: 1) resist wind uplift and scour, 2) reduce fire risk associated with air intakes or proximity to flammable materials and equipment, 3) provide access for roof maintenance related issues 4) provide enhanced flow path toward drains out scuppers for runoff sheeting off walls and parapets and 5) in areas where exhausts onto the roof surface or presence of condensate releases would negatively affect plant growth.
These vegetation free zones are most often located at a minimum around the roof perimeter and around roof drains and other roof penetrations. INSERT Figure 5.2: Vegetation free zones at Target Center Green Roof, Minneapolis, MN, Image courtesy of The Kestrel Design Group, Inc. The ANSI/SPRI VF-1 External Fire Design Standard for Vegetative Roofs, Available at http://www.greenroofs.org/resources/ANSI_SPRI_VF_1_Extrernal_Fire_Design_Standard_for_Vegetative_Roofs_Jan_2010.pdf provides guidance for minimizing the risk of fire on green roofs, including recommendations for location and width of vegetation free zones for fire safety.
ANSI/SPRI RP-14 Wind Design Standard for Vegetative Roofing Systems, available at http://www.greenroofs.org/resources/ANSI_SPRI_RP_14_2010_Wind_Design_Standard_for_Vegetative_Roofing_Systems.pdf provides guidance for minimizing risk of wind uplift on green roofs, including recommendations for location and width of vegetation free zones in areas of the roof particularly vulnerable to wind uplift and scour.
Guidelines for locations and widths are also included in the FLL Green Roofing Guideline.
Currently available guidelines, with the exception of the FLL Green Roofing Guideline, are based on very limited field data. Designers and practitioners should stay abreast of updated recommendations and guidelines as more reliable field information becomes available.
The following components are part of almost all green roofs. each of these is discussed in greater detail below.
Examples of optional green roof components are listed below.
INSERT Figure 5.3: Typical Green Roof Sections, Images from www.greenroofservice.com INSERT Figure 5.4: Typical native soil vs. Typical Green Roof Profile, Images from ZinCo
Choosing a durable, quality waterproofing assembly is crucial especially for green roofs, since the waterproofing assembly is buried under the green roof, so repairing or replacing the waterproofing is more costly and more complicated than for a traditional roof. Consult with a roofing consultant or other qualified professional to design the waterproofing assembly for a new roof, or to evaluate an existing roof on which the green roof will be installed. It is highly recommended that the waterproofing membrane is tested for leaks (see l, leak detection system) both after the waterproofing is installed as well as after all construction traffic on the green roof is complete, including, for example, installation of mechanical equipment, or windows on adjacent walls. Testing right after waterproofing is installed allows for correction of any leaks prior to installing the green roof. Testing after all construction traffic on the roof is complete will detect whether or not any leaks developed between the time of the first leak detection test and the completion of all subsequent work on the roof. The Importance of preserving an option for post-construction leak surveys will, however, influence the green roof design. Leak detection of green roof assemblies that incorporate root-barriers is very challenging, if not impossible in most instances.
Workmanship and proper construction sequencing are the factors mostly closely correlated to waterproofing success. Leak testing, while a prudent precaution and check, is not a substitute for craftsmanlike installation of the waterproofing layer. INSERT Figure 5.5: Roof Membrane Installation at Target Center Green Roof, Minneapolis, MN, Image courtesy of The Kestrel Design Group, Inc.
A root barrier prevents plant roots from damaging the waterproofing membrane. When using waterproofing membranes that are root resistant, such as, for example, PVC, TPO and EPDM membranes, a separate root barrier may not be needed. While some waterproofing membranes can resist roots on their own, many will require an additional component to protect the waterproofing membrane from root damage. When plants with vigorous roots are selected, an additional root barrier layer is often installed above root resistant membranes. Common materials used for root barriers include PVC, TPO, and polyethylene. The root barrier is sometimes part of the drainage board.
It is recommended to use al root-barrier that successfully passed the VR-1 test, a standardized method to evaluate root resistance of both waterproofing and root-barrier products: ANSI/GRHC/SPRI VR-1 Procedure for Investigating Resistance to Root Penetration on Vegetative Green Roofs, available at www.spri.org. INSERT Figure 5.6: Root Barrier Welding, Image courtesy of Roofscapes
In most applications a cushioning layer will be installed on top of the waterproofing or root-barrier to resist strains induced by point loads or puncture from sharp protections. This protection layer is a water-permeable, synthetic fiber material with good puncture resistance. It is often part of the drainage panel.
While green roofs are designed to retain and detain stormwater and supply vegetation with the water they need, drainage components are also needed to remove excess water. Inadequate drainage can result, for example, in structural loading problems, major damage to the building, as well as problems with plant health. Drainage capacity must also account for vertical sheet flow from adjacent facades or tall parapets.
It is highly recommended that the waterproofing membrane is tested for leaks (see l, leak detection system) both after the waterproofing is installed as well as after all construction traffic on the green roof is complete, including, for example, installation of mechanical equipment, or windows on adjacent walls. Testing right after waterproofing is installed allows for correction of any leaks prior to installing the green roof. Testing after all construction traffic on the roof is complete will detect whether or not any leaks developed between the time of the first leak detection test and the completion of all subsequent work on the roof. The Importance of preserving an option for post-construction leak surveys will, however, influence the green roof design. Leak detection of green roof assemblies that incorporate root-barriers is very challenging, if not impossible in most instances.
Workmanship and proper construction sequencing are the factors mostly closely correlated to waterproofing success. Leak testing, while a prudent precaution and check, is not a substitute for craftsmanlike installation of the waterproofing layer.
INSERT Figure 5.5: Roof Membrane Installation at Target Center Green Roof, Minneapolis, MN, Image courtesy of The Kestrel Design Group, Inc.
A root barrier prevents plant roots from damaging the waterproofing membrane. When using waterproofing membranes that are root resistant, such as, for example, PVC, TPO and EPDM membranes, a separate root barrier may not be needed. While some waterproofing membranes can resist roots on their own, many will require an additional component to protect the waterproofing membrane from root damage. When plants with vigorous roots are selected, an additional root barrier layer is often installed above root resistant membranes. Common materials used for root barriers include PVC, TPO, and polyethylene. The root barrier is sometimes part of the drainage board.
It is recommended to use al root-barrier that successfully passed the VR-1 test, a standardized method to evaluate root resistance of both waterproofing and root-barrier products: ANSI/GRHC/SPRI VR-1 Procedure for Investigating Resistance to Root Penetration on Vegetative Green Roofs, available at www.spri.org.
INSERT Figure 5.6: Root Barrier Welding, Image courtesy of Roofscapes
In most applications a cushioning layer will be installed on top of the waterproofing or root-barrier to resist strains induced by point loads or puncture from sharp protections. This protection layer is a water-permeable, synthetic fiber material with good puncture resistance. It is often part of the drainage panel.
While green roofs are designed to retain and detain stormwater and supply vegetation with the water they need, drainage components are also needed to remove excess water. Inadequate drainage can result, for example, in structural loading problems, major damage to the building, as well as problems with plant health. Drainage capacity must also account for vertical sheet flow from adjacent facades or tall parapets.
The following components are part of almost all green roofs. each of these is discussed in greater detail below.
Examples of optional green roof components are listed below.
INSERT Figure 5.3: Typical Green Roof Sections, Images from www.greenroofservice.com INSERT Figure 5.4: Typical native soil vs. Typical Green Roof Profile, Images from ZinCo