Dfairbairn (talk | contribs) |
Dfairbairn (talk | contribs) (ET language clarification and consistency) |
||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
*Channel slope cannot be greater than 4 percent or less than 0.5 percent | *Channel slope cannot be greater than 4 percent or less than 0.5 percent | ||
*Infiltration rates of the underlying soils cannot exceed 1.63 inches per hour | *Infiltration rates of the underlying soils cannot exceed 1.63 inches per hour | ||
− | *The water below the underdrain must meet the drawdown time requirement | + | *The water below the underdrain must meet the user-defined drawdown time requirement. The drawdown time requirement is checked by comparing the user-defined drawdown time with the calculated drawdown time (DDT<sub>calc</sub>), given by |
<math>DDT_{calc} = D_U / (I_R / 12)</math> | <math>DDT_{calc} = D_U / (I_R / 12)</math> | ||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
:I<sub>R</sub> is the infiltration rate of the native soils (inches/hr). | :I<sub>R</sub> is the infiltration rate of the native soils (inches/hr). | ||
− | If the DDT<sub>calc</sub> is greater than the user defined required drawdown time then the user will be prompted to enter a new depth below the underdrain or infiltration rate of the native soils. | + | If the DDT<sub>calc</sub> is greater than the user-defined required drawdown time then the user will be prompted to enter a new depth below the underdrain or infiltration rate of the native soils. |
==Methodology== | ==Methodology== | ||
===Required Treatment Volume=== | ===Required Treatment Volume=== | ||
− | + | ''Required treatment volume'', or the volume of stormwater runoff delivered to the BMP, is calculated as the performance goal (1.1 inches or user-specified performance goal) times the impervious area draining to the BMP. This stormwater is delivered to the BMP instantaneously following the [http://www.stormh2o.com/SW/Articles/Kerplunk_15253.aspx Kerplunk method]. | |
− | ''Required treatment volume'', or the volume of stormwater runoff delivered to the BMP, | ||
===Volume Reduction=== | ===Volume Reduction=== | ||
− | The volume reduction achieved by a BMP compares the capacity of the BMP to the required treatment volume. The ''Volume reduction capacity of BMP [V]'' is calculated using BMP inputs provided by the user. For this BMP, | + | The volume reduction achieved by a BMP compares the capacity of the BMP to the required treatment volume. The ''Volume reduction capacity of BMP [V]'' is calculated using BMP inputs provided by the user. For this BMP, the location of the underdrain determines how the volume reduction capacity is calculated. |
'''Underdrain located at BMP bottom:''' If the underdrain is located at the bottom of the BMP, then the ''Volume reduction capacity of BMP [V]'' is determined based on infiltration into the bottom of the BMP (V<sub>inf_b</sub>) and evapotranspiration in the planting media above the underdrain (V<sub>ET</sub>). | '''Underdrain located at BMP bottom:''' If the underdrain is located at the bottom of the BMP, then the ''Volume reduction capacity of BMP [V]'' is determined based on infiltration into the bottom of the BMP (V<sub>inf_b</sub>) and evapotranspiration in the planting media above the underdrain (V<sub>ET</sub>). | ||
− | Even with an underdrain present, under saturated media conditions some water will infiltrate through the bottom soils as water in the basin draws down. The | + | Even with an underdrain present, under saturated media conditions some water will infiltrate through the bottom soils as water in the basin draws down. The ''Volume reduction from basin bottom infiltration (V<sub>inf_b</sub>)'' of the BMP equals the following |
<math>V_{Inf_B} = I_R * (DDT) * W_B * L_C/(12in/ft)</math> | <math>V_{Inf_B} = I_R * (DDT) * W_B * L_C/(12in/ft)</math> | ||
Line 69: | Line 68: | ||
:I<sub>R</sub> is an infiltration rate into the native soils of 0.06 inches per hour; | :I<sub>R</sub> is an infiltration rate into the native soils of 0.06 inches per hour; | ||
:W<sub>B</sub> is the width of the main channel (ft); | :W<sub>B</sub> is the width of the main channel (ft); | ||
− | :L<sub>C</sub> is the channel length(ft); and | + | :L<sub>C</sub> is the channel length (ft); and |
− | :DDT is the drawdown time | + | :DDT is the drawdown time (hr). |
− | The default infiltration rate is set at 0.06 inches per hour to represent a D soil. This rate was selected because it is assumed most of the stormwater will pass through the underdrain before it can infiltrate through the bottom of the BMP. This may be a conservative assumption if underdrains are small, spaced far apart, and the underlying soil has an infiltration rate greater than 0.06 inches per hour. Conversely, more closely spaced or larger underdrains may allow the basin to drain in less than the required drawdown time, resulting in a slight overestimation of infiltration loss through the basin bottom. If the user specifies that an impermeable liner is present at the bottom of the BMP, then no credit is given for infiltration into the bottom soils. | + | The default infiltration rate is set at 0.06 inches per hour to represent a D soil. This rate was selected because it is assumed that most of the stormwater will pass through the underdrain before it can infiltrate through the bottom of the BMP. This may be a conservative assumption if underdrains are small, spaced far apart, and the underlying soil has an infiltration rate greater than 0.06 inches per hour. Conversely, more closely spaced or larger underdrains may allow the basin to drain in less than the required drawdown time, resulting in a slight overestimation of infiltration loss through the basin bottom. If the user specifies that an impermeable liner is present at the bottom of the BMP, then no credit is given for infiltration into the bottom soils. |
− | In addition to the credit given for the infiltration below the underdrain, a swale main channel BMP can also achieve stormwater volume reduction through evapotranspiration (V<sub>ET</sub>). The | + | In addition to the credit given for the infiltration below the underdrain, a swale main channel BMP can also achieve stormwater volume reduction through evapotranspiration (V<sub>ET</sub>). The ''Volume reduction of BMP from ET (V<sub>ET</sub>)'' is the smaller of two calculated values, potential ET (ET<sub>pot</sub>) and measured ET (ET<sub>mea</sub>). |
− | * | + | *ET<sub>pot</sub> is equal to the amount of water stored between field capacity and the wilting point in the media above the underdrain, and is given by |
<math>ET_{pot} = ((D_M - D_U ) * (L_C * W_B) * (FC - WP))</math> | <math>ET_{pot} = ((D_M - D_U ) * (L_C * W_B) * (FC - WP))</math> | ||
Line 82: | Line 81: | ||
Where | Where | ||
− | :D<sub>M</sub> is the total media depth | + | :D<sub>M</sub> is the total media depth (ft); |
− | :D<sub>U</sub> is the depth under the underdrain | + | :D<sub>U</sub> is the depth under the underdrain (ft); |
− | :L<sub>C</sub> is the channel length; | + | :L<sub>C</sub> is the channel length (ft); |
− | :W<sub>B</sub> is the channel width; and | + | :W<sub>B</sub> is the channel width (ft); and |
:(FC – WP) is the difference between field capacity and wilting point. | :(FC – WP) is the difference between field capacity and wilting point. | ||
− | * | + | *ET<sub>mea</sub> is the amount of water lost to ET as measured using available data. An average daily pan evaporation rate was estimated using previous measurements collected at the University of Minnesota Southwest Experiment Station at Lamberton, Minnesota (Source: [http://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/109293 Climate of Minnesota Part XII- The Hydrologic Cycle and Soil Water], 1979). A rate of 0.2 inches per day was selected, as this is an intermediate value between the summertime maximum rate and the lowest rates in October. Analysis of rainfall data indicates that a typical time period between precipitation events is 72 hours (3 days) in Minnesota. Therefore, a 3 day period is used to calculate the ET<sub>mea</sub>. A factor of 0.5 is also applied to convert the pan evaporation rate to ET<sub>mea</sub>. The ET<sub>mea</sub> volume thus equals the media surface area (L<sub>C</sub> * W<sub>B</sub>) in square feet times the average daily ET rate in inches per day times 3 days. |
<math>ET_{mea} = L_C * W_B * 0.2 in/day * 0.5 *3 days / 12 in/ft </math> | <math>ET_{mea} = L_C * W_B * 0.2 in/day * 0.5 *3 days / 12 in/ft </math> | ||
− | + | ET<sub>mea</sub> and ET<sub>pot</sub> are compared and the estimated ''Volume reduction of BMP from ET (V<sub>ET</sub>)'' is the smaller of the two values. | |
'''Elevated Underdrain:''' If the underdrain is elevated above the bottom of the BMP, then the volume reduction credit is determined based on the storage capacity in the media between the underdrain and the native soils and evapotranspiration in the planting media above the underdrain (V<sub>ET</sub>). | '''Elevated Underdrain:''' If the underdrain is elevated above the bottom of the BMP, then the volume reduction credit is determined based on the storage capacity in the media between the underdrain and the native soils and evapotranspiration in the planting media above the underdrain (V<sub>ET</sub>). | ||
− | The | + | The ''Volume reduction stored below the underdrain'' is given by |
<math>V = L_C * W_B * n * D_U</math> | <math>V = L_C * W_B * n * D_U</math> |
A swale main channel with an underdrain behaves similarly to a bioretention BMP with an underdrain. Volume retention is achieved through infiltration of water stored in the pore spaces of engineered media between the invert of an elevated underdrain and the native soils. If the underdrain is not elevated above the native soils then volume reduction is achieved through infiltration below the underdrain. Volume retention also occurs by evapotranspiration through the vegetation in the swale. If runoff to the main channel flows over a side slope through sheet flow, a swale side slope BMP should be used in combination with the swale main channel BMP. All pollutants in the infiltrated water are credited as being reduced. A portion of pollutants in the stormwater that flows through an underdrain are removed through filtration.
For a swale main channel with underdrain system, the user must input the following parameters to calculate the volume and pollutant load reductions associated with the BMP.
If the following requirements for inputs into the MIDS calculator are not met, then an error message will inform the user to change the input to meet the requirement.
\(DDT_{calc} = D_U / (I_R / 12)\)
Where
If the DDTcalc is greater than the user-defined required drawdown time then the user will be prompted to enter a new depth below the underdrain or infiltration rate of the native soils.
Required treatment volume, or the volume of stormwater runoff delivered to the BMP, is calculated as the performance goal (1.1 inches or user-specified performance goal) times the impervious area draining to the BMP. This stormwater is delivered to the BMP instantaneously following the Kerplunk method.
The volume reduction achieved by a BMP compares the capacity of the BMP to the required treatment volume. The Volume reduction capacity of BMP [V] is calculated using BMP inputs provided by the user. For this BMP, the location of the underdrain determines how the volume reduction capacity is calculated.
Underdrain located at BMP bottom: If the underdrain is located at the bottom of the BMP, then the Volume reduction capacity of BMP [V] is determined based on infiltration into the bottom of the BMP (Vinf_b) and evapotranspiration in the planting media above the underdrain (VET).
Even with an underdrain present, under saturated media conditions some water will infiltrate through the bottom soils as water in the basin draws down. The Volume reduction from basin bottom infiltration (Vinf_b) of the BMP equals the following
\(V_{Inf_B} = I_R * (DDT) * W_B * L_C/(12in/ft)\)
Where
The default infiltration rate is set at 0.06 inches per hour to represent a D soil. This rate was selected because it is assumed that most of the stormwater will pass through the underdrain before it can infiltrate through the bottom of the BMP. This may be a conservative assumption if underdrains are small, spaced far apart, and the underlying soil has an infiltration rate greater than 0.06 inches per hour. Conversely, more closely spaced or larger underdrains may allow the basin to drain in less than the required drawdown time, resulting in a slight overestimation of infiltration loss through the basin bottom. If the user specifies that an impermeable liner is present at the bottom of the BMP, then no credit is given for infiltration into the bottom soils.
In addition to the credit given for the infiltration below the underdrain, a swale main channel BMP can also achieve stormwater volume reduction through evapotranspiration (VET). The Volume reduction of BMP from ET (VET) is the smaller of two calculated values, potential ET (ETpot) and measured ET (ETmea).
\(ET_{pot} = ((D_M - D_U ) * (L_C * W_B) * (FC - WP))\)
Where
\(ET_{mea} = L_C * W_B * 0.2 in/day * 0.5 *3 days / 12 in/ft \)
ETmea and ETpot are compared and the estimated Volume reduction of BMP from ET (VET) is the smaller of the two values.
Elevated Underdrain: If the underdrain is elevated above the bottom of the BMP, then the volume reduction credit is determined based on the storage capacity in the media between the underdrain and the native soils and evapotranspiration in the planting media above the underdrain (VET).
The Volume reduction stored below the underdrain is given by
\(V = L_C * W_B * n * D_U\)
Where
The stored water must drain within the specified drawdown time. The underlying soil controls the infiltration rate. The user must input the soil with the most restrictive hydraulic conductivity in the 3 feet directly below the basin (i.e. below the bottom of the engineered media).
In addition to the credit given for the storage capacity below the underdrain, a swale main channel system with an elevated underdrain also receives volume reduction credit for evapotranspiration. Credit is given following the same methods described when the underdrain is located at the bottom of the BMP (see discussion above).
The Volume of retention provided by BMP is the amount of volume credit the BMP provides toward the performance goal. This value is equal to the Volume reduction capacity of BMP [V], calculated using the above method, as long as the volume reduction capacity is less than or equal to the Required treatment volume. If Volume reduction capacity of BMP [V] is greater than Required treatment volume, then the BMP volume credit is equal to Required treatment volume. This check makes sure the BMP is not getting more credit than the amount of water it receives. For example, if the BMP is oversized the user will only receive credit for Required treatment volume routed to the BMP.
Pollutant load reductions are calculated on an annual basis. Therefore, the first step in calculating annual pollutant load reductions is converting the “Volume reduction capacity of BMP,” which is an instantaneous volume reduction, to an annual volume reduction percentage. This is accomplished through the use of performance curves developed from multiple modeling scenarios. The performance curves use the Volume reduction capacity of BMP [V], the infiltration rate of the underlying soils, the contributing watershed percent impervious area, and the size of the contributing watershed to calculate a percent annual volume reduction. While oversizing a BMP above the Required treatment volume will not provide additional credit towards the performance goal volume, it may provide additional pollutant reduction.
A 100 percent removal is credited for all pollutants associated with the reduced volume of stormwater. Stormwater that is captured by the swale system but that is not infiltrated or lost through ET is assumed to flow through the filter media and out the underdrain. A constant 68 percent TSS removal rate is applied to the filtered stormwater. The removal rates for particulate phosphorus and dissolved phosphorus in the filtered stormwater depend on the answers given to the three user inputs: “Planting media mix”, “Is the P content of the media less than 30 mg/kg?” and “Is a soil amendment used to attenuate phosphorus?”
Particulate Phosphorus: The particulate phosphorus credit given is either 0 percent or 45 percent depending on the media mix used and its P content.
Dissolved Phosphorus: The dissolved phosphorus credit given is between 0 percent and 60 percent depending on the media mix, the media P content, and if the media was amended to attenuate phosphorus.
\(credit = 20 * ((D_M - D_U)) / (2 ft)\)
where (DM - DU) represents the media depth above the underdrain. The credit is calculated as a percent reduction with a maximum value of 20 percent for media depths above the underdrain greater than 2 feet. If the media depth above the underdrain is less than 2 feet the credit is reduced equivalently.
Annual removal rates of particulate phosphorus and dissolved phosphorus in filtered stormwater are summarized in the following table.
NOTE: The user can modify event mean concentrations (EMCs) on the Site Information tab in the calculator. Default concentrations are 54.5 milligrams per liter for total suspended solids (TSS) and 0.3 milligrams per liter for total phosphorus (particulate plus dissolved). The calculator will notify the user if the default is changed. Changing the default EMC will result in changes to the total pounds of pollutant reduced.
Overflow from a swale main channel with an underdrain can be routed to any other BMP, except for a green roof and a swale side slope or any BMP in a stormwater treatment sequence that would cause stormwater to be rerouted back to the swale main channel already in the treatment sequence. All BMPs can be routed to the swale main channel.
The following general assumption applies in calculating the credit for a swale main channel with an underdrain. If this assumption is not followed the volume and pollutant reduction credits cannot be applied.