Dfairbairn (talk | contribs) |
Dfairbairn (talk | contribs) (Volume and Pollutant Reduction Language) |
||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
==Methodology== | ==Methodology== | ||
− | ===Required | + | ===Required treatment volume=== |
''Required treatment volume'', or the volume of stormwater runoff delivered to the BMP, is calculated as the performance goal (1.1 inches or user-specified performance goal) times the impervious area draining to the BMP plus any water routed to the BMP from an upstream BMP. This stormwater is delivered to the BMP instantaneously following the [http://www.stormh2o.com/SW/Articles/Kerplunk_15253.aspx Kerplunk method]. | ''Required treatment volume'', or the volume of stormwater runoff delivered to the BMP, is calculated as the performance goal (1.1 inches or user-specified performance goal) times the impervious area draining to the BMP plus any water routed to the BMP from an upstream BMP. This stormwater is delivered to the BMP instantaneously following the [http://www.stormh2o.com/SW/Articles/Kerplunk_15253.aspx Kerplunk method]. | ||
− | ===Volume | + | ===Volume reduction=== |
The volume reduction achieved by a BMP compares the capacity of the BMP to the required treatment volume. The ''Volume reduction capacity of BMP [V]'' is calculated using BMP inputs provided by the user. For this BMP, the location of the underdrain determines how the volume reduction capacity is calculated. | The volume reduction achieved by a BMP compares the capacity of the BMP to the required treatment volume. The ''Volume reduction capacity of BMP [V]'' is calculated using BMP inputs provided by the user. For this BMP, the location of the underdrain determines how the volume reduction capacity is calculated. | ||
Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
ET<sub>mea</sub> and ET<sub>pot</sub> are compared and the estimated ''Volume reduction of BMP from ET (V<sub>ET</sub>)'' is the smaller of the two values. | ET<sub>mea</sub> and ET<sub>pot</sub> are compared and the estimated ''Volume reduction of BMP from ET (V<sub>ET</sub>)'' is the smaller of the two values. | ||
− | '''Elevated | + | '''Elevated underdrain:''' If the underdrain is elevated above the bottom of the BMP, then the volume reduction credit is determined based on the storage capacity in the media between the underdrain and the native soils, and evapotranspiration in the media above the underdrain (V<sub>ET</sub>). |
The ''Volume reduction stored below the underdrain'' is given by | The ''Volume reduction stored below the underdrain'' is given by | ||
Line 110: | Line 110: | ||
The V<sub>ET</sub> credit is calculated with the same methods as when the underdrain is located at the bottom of the BMP (see discussion above). | The V<sub>ET</sub> credit is calculated with the same methods as when the underdrain is located at the bottom of the BMP (see discussion above). | ||
− | + | '''Comparison with performance goal:''' Whether the underdrain is elevated or at the bottom of the system, the sum of the volumes lost to infiltration and to ET gives the ''Volume reduction capacity of BMP [V]''. The ''Volume reduction capacity of BMP [V]'' is compared with the ''Required treatment volume'', and the ''Volume of retention provided by BMP'' field is populated with the lesser of the two values. This comparison between potential and actual treatment volumes ensures that the BMP does not claim more credit than is due based on the actual amount of water routed to it. The ''Volume of retention provided by BMP'' is the actual volume credit the BMP provides toward the performance goal. For example, if the BMP is oversized the user will only receive volume credit for the ''Required treatment volume'' routed to the BMP. | |
− | ===Pollutant | + | Attainment of performance goals for volume and pollutant reductions on an annual basis is assessed by converting the ''Volume reduction capacity of BMP [V]'', which is an instantaneous volume reduction, to an annual volume reduction percentage. This is accomplished through the use of [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=Performance_curves_for_MIDS_calculator&action=edit&redlink=1 performance curves] developed from a range of modeling scenarios. The performance curves use the ''Volume reduction capacity of BMP [V]'', the infiltration rate of the underlying soils, the contributing watershed percent impervious area, and the size of the contributing watershed to calculate a percent annual volume reduction. |
+ | ===Pollutant reduction=== | ||
[[File:Schematic of pollutant removal mechanism swale with underdrain.jpg|300px|thumb|alt=Schematic of pollutant removal mechanism swale with underdrain|<font size=3>Schematic of pollutant removal mechanisms for a Swale Main Channel (with underdrain).</font size>]] | [[File:Schematic of pollutant removal mechanism swale with underdrain.jpg|300px|thumb|alt=Schematic of pollutant removal mechanism swale with underdrain|<font size=3>Schematic of pollutant removal mechanisms for a Swale Main Channel (with underdrain).</font size>]] | ||
− | Pollutant load reductions are calculated on an annual basis. Therefore, the first step in calculating annual pollutant load reductions is | + | Pollutant load reductions are calculated on an annual basis and are dependent upon the volume of water treated by a BMP. Therefore, the first step in calculating annual pollutant load reductions is to determine the annual volume reductions achieved by the BMP. All pollutants in the infiltrated water are considered captured for a 100 percent removal. While oversizing a BMP above the ''Required treatment volume'' will not provide additional credit towards the performance goal volume, it may thus provide additional pollutant reduction. |
− | + | Stormwater that is routed to the BMP but that is not infiltrated or lost through ET is assumed to flow through the filter media and out the underdrain. A TSS removal rate of 68 percent is applied to the filtered stormwater. The removal rates for particulate phosphorus and dissolved phosphorus in the filtered stormwater depend on the user's input to three drop-down boxes: “Planting media mix”, “Is the P content of the media less than 30 mg/kg?” and “Is a soil amendment used to attenuate phosphorus?” | |
− | '''Particulate | + | '''Particulate phosphorus:''' The particulate phosphorus credit given is either 0 percent or 45 percent depending on the media mix used and its P content. |
*If [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Construction_specifications_for_bioretention#Materials_specifications_-_filter_media Media Mix] C or D is used, the annual particulate phosphorus reduction credit is 45 percent of the filtered water volume. | *If [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Construction_specifications_for_bioretention#Materials_specifications_-_filter_media Media Mix] C or D is used, the annual particulate phosphorus reduction credit is 45 percent of the filtered water volume. | ||
Line 126: | Line 127: | ||
*If a media mix other than C or D is used and the soil phosphorus has not been determined, the annual particulate phosphorus credit is 0 percent of the filtered water volume. | *If a media mix other than C or D is used and the soil phosphorus has not been determined, the annual particulate phosphorus credit is 0 percent of the filtered water volume. | ||
− | '''Dissolved | + | '''Dissolved phosphorus:''' The dissolved phosphorus credit given is between 0 percent and 60 percent depending on the media mix, the media P content, and if the media was amended to attenuate phosphorus. |
*If Media Mix C or D is used, or if a media mix other than C or D is used and soil phosphorus as measured by the [http://soiltesting.tamu.edu/files/mehlich3.pdf Mehlich 3 test] or a suitable alternative test is 30 milligrams per kilogram or less [[Design_criteria_for_bioretention#Notes_about_soil_phosphorus_testing:_applicability_and_interpretation|(note: if the Olsen test is used, a simple conversion is required)]], then the annual dissolved phosphorus credit applied to the filtered water volume, expressed as a percent, is given by | *If Media Mix C or D is used, or if a media mix other than C or D is used and soil phosphorus as measured by the [http://soiltesting.tamu.edu/files/mehlich3.pdf Mehlich 3 test] or a suitable alternative test is 30 milligrams per kilogram or less [[Design_criteria_for_bioretention#Notes_about_soil_phosphorus_testing:_applicability_and_interpretation|(note: if the Olsen test is used, a simple conversion is required)]], then the annual dissolved phosphorus credit applied to the filtered water volume, expressed as a percent, is given by |
A swale main channel with an underdrain behaves similarly to a bioretention BMP with an underdrain. Volume retention is achieved through infiltration of water stored in the pore spaces of engineered media between the invert of an elevated underdrain and the native soils. If the underdrain is not elevated above the native soils then volume reduction is achieved through infiltration below the underdrain. Volume retention also occurs by evapotranspiration through the vegetation in the swale. If runoff to the main channel flows over a side slope through sheet flow, then a swale side slope BMP should be used in combination with the swale main channel BMP in the MIDS calculator. All pollutants in the infiltrated water are credited as being reduced. A portion of pollutants in the stormwater that flows through an underdrain are removed through filtration.
For a swale main channel with underdrain system, the user must input the following parameters to calculate the volume and pollutant load reductions associated with the BMP.
If the following requirements for inputs into the MIDS calculator are not met, then an error message will inform the user to change the input to meet the requirement.
\(DDT_{calc} = D_U / (I_R / 12)\)
Where
If the DDTcalc is greater than the user-defined required drawdown time then the user will be prompted to enter a new depth below the underdrain or infiltration rate of the native soils.
Required treatment volume, or the volume of stormwater runoff delivered to the BMP, is calculated as the performance goal (1.1 inches or user-specified performance goal) times the impervious area draining to the BMP plus any water routed to the BMP from an upstream BMP. This stormwater is delivered to the BMP instantaneously following the Kerplunk method.
The volume reduction achieved by a BMP compares the capacity of the BMP to the required treatment volume. The Volume reduction capacity of BMP [V] is calculated using BMP inputs provided by the user. For this BMP, the location of the underdrain determines how the volume reduction capacity is calculated.
Underdrain located at BMP bottom: If the underdrain is located at the bottom of the BMP, then the Volume reduction capacity of BMP [V] is determined based on infiltration into the bottom of the BMP (Vinf_b) and evapotranspiration in the planting media above the underdrain (VET).
Even with an underdrain present, under saturated media conditions some water will infiltrate through the bottom soils as water in the basin draws down. The Volume reduction from basin bottom infiltration (Vinf_b) of the BMP equals the following
\(V_{Inf_B} = I_R * DDT * W_B * L_C/(12in/ft)\)
Where
The default infiltration rate is set at 0.06 inches per hour to represent a D soil. This rate was selected because it is assumed that most of the stormwater will pass through the underdrain before it can infiltrate through the bottom of the BMP. This may be a conservative assumption if underdrains are small, spaced far apart, and the underlying soil has an infiltration rate greater than 0.06 inches per hour. Conversely, more closely spaced or larger underdrains may allow the basin to drain in less than the required drawdown time, resulting in a slight overestimation of infiltration loss through the basin bottom. If the user specifies that an impermeable liner is present at the bottom of the BMP, then no credit is given for infiltration into the bottom soils.
In addition to the credit given for the infiltration below the underdrain, a swale main channel BMP can also achieve stormwater volume reduction through evapotranspiration (VET). The Volume reduction of BMP from ET (VET) is the smaller of two calculated values, potential ET (ETpot) and measured ET (ETmea).
\(ET_{pot} = (D_M - D_U ) * L_C * W_B * (FC - WP)\)
Where
\(ET_{mea} = L_C * W_B * 0.2 in/day * 0.5 *3 days / (12 in/ft) \)
ETmea and ETpot are compared and the estimated Volume reduction of BMP from ET (VET) is the smaller of the two values.
Elevated underdrain: If the underdrain is elevated above the bottom of the BMP, then the volume reduction credit is determined based on the storage capacity in the media between the underdrain and the native soils, and evapotranspiration in the media above the underdrain (VET).
The Volume reduction stored below the underdrain is given by
\(V = L_C * W_B * (n-FC) * D_U\)
Where
The stored water must drain within the specified drawdown time. The underlying soil controls the infiltration rate. The user must input the soil with the most restrictive hydraulic conductivity in the 3 feet directly below the basin (i.e. below the bottom of the engineered media).
The VET credit is calculated with the same methods as when the underdrain is located at the bottom of the BMP (see discussion above).
Comparison with performance goal: Whether the underdrain is elevated or at the bottom of the system, the sum of the volumes lost to infiltration and to ET gives the Volume reduction capacity of BMP [V]. The Volume reduction capacity of BMP [V] is compared with the Required treatment volume, and the Volume of retention provided by BMP field is populated with the lesser of the two values. This comparison between potential and actual treatment volumes ensures that the BMP does not claim more credit than is due based on the actual amount of water routed to it. The Volume of retention provided by BMP is the actual volume credit the BMP provides toward the performance goal. For example, if the BMP is oversized the user will only receive volume credit for the Required treatment volume routed to the BMP.
Attainment of performance goals for volume and pollutant reductions on an annual basis is assessed by converting the Volume reduction capacity of BMP [V], which is an instantaneous volume reduction, to an annual volume reduction percentage. This is accomplished through the use of performance curves developed from a range of modeling scenarios. The performance curves use the Volume reduction capacity of BMP [V], the infiltration rate of the underlying soils, the contributing watershed percent impervious area, and the size of the contributing watershed to calculate a percent annual volume reduction.
Pollutant load reductions are calculated on an annual basis and are dependent upon the volume of water treated by a BMP. Therefore, the first step in calculating annual pollutant load reductions is to determine the annual volume reductions achieved by the BMP. All pollutants in the infiltrated water are considered captured for a 100 percent removal. While oversizing a BMP above the Required treatment volume will not provide additional credit towards the performance goal volume, it may thus provide additional pollutant reduction.
Stormwater that is routed to the BMP but that is not infiltrated or lost through ET is assumed to flow through the filter media and out the underdrain. A TSS removal rate of 68 percent is applied to the filtered stormwater. The removal rates for particulate phosphorus and dissolved phosphorus in the filtered stormwater depend on the user's input to three drop-down boxes: “Planting media mix”, “Is the P content of the media less than 30 mg/kg?” and “Is a soil amendment used to attenuate phosphorus?”
Particulate phosphorus: The particulate phosphorus credit given is either 0 percent or 45 percent depending on the media mix used and its P content.
Dissolved phosphorus: The dissolved phosphorus credit given is between 0 percent and 60 percent depending on the media mix, the media P content, and if the media was amended to attenuate phosphorus.
\(credit = 20 * ((D_M - D_U)) / (2 ft)\)
where (DM - DU) represents the media depth above the underdrain. The credit is calculated as a percent reduction with a maximum value of 20 percent for media depths above the underdrain greater than 2 feet. If the media depth above the underdrain is less than 2 feet the credit is reduced equivalently.
Annual removal rates of particulate phosphorus and dissolved phosphorus in filtered stormwater are summarized in the following table.
NOTE: The user can modify event mean concentrations (EMCs) on the Site Information tab in the calculator. Default concentrations are 54.5 milligrams per liter for total suspended solids (TSS) and 0.3 milligrams per liter for total phosphorus (particulate plus dissolved). The calculator will notify the user if the default is changed. Changing the default EMC will result in changes to the total pounds of pollutant reduced.
Overflow from a swale main channel with an underdrain can be routed to any other BMP except for a green roof, a swale side slope, or any BMP in a stormwater treatment sequence that would cause stormwater to be rerouted back to the swale main channel already in that sequence. All BMPs can be routed to the swale main channel with an underdrain.
The following general assumption applies in calculating the credit for a swale main channel with an underdrain. If this assumption is not followed the volume and pollutant reduction credits cannot be applied.