m |
m |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | {{alert|This site is under construction. Anticipated completion date is June, 2015.|alert-under-construction}} | ||
+ | |||
{{alert|several proprietray software models are included in this discussion. Inclusion of these models does not represent an endorsement by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA)|alert-info}} | {{alert|several proprietray software models are included in this discussion. Inclusion of these models does not represent an endorsement by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA)|alert-info}} | ||
Hydrologic, hydraulic, and water quality models all have different purposes and will provide different information. The tables below summarize some of the commonly used modeling software and modeling functions and the main purpose for which they were developed. The tables show the relative levels of complexity of necessary input data, indicates whether the model can complete a continuous analysis or is event based, lists whether the model is in the public domain, and for hydraulic models indicates whether unsteady flow calculations can be conducted. For water quality models, the tables indicate whether the model is a receiving waters model, a loading model, or a BMP analysis model. The following definitions apply to the model functions.
This table classifies common models by type of model. The information in this table can be download as an Excel file. Reference or links to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, service mark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
Link to this table.