Difference between revisions of "Comparison of materials used for rainwater harvesting systems"
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
<td>●●●○○</td> | <td>●●●○○</td> | ||
<td>●●●●○</td> | <td>●●●●○</td> | ||
| − | <td> | + | <td>●●○○○</td> |
<td>X</td> | <td>X</td> | ||
<td>X</td> | <td>X</td> | ||
Revision as of 20:49, 15 August 2016
Link to this table
| Material | Cost low - high | Installation hard - easy | Longevity short - long | Durability low - high | Maintenance Access hard - easy | Best Use Capacity (gallons) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Underground | FiberglassX | 💲💲💲💲💲 | ●●●○○ | ●●●●○ | ●●○○○ | X | X | X |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |