Difference between revisions of "Comparison of materials used for rainwater harvesting systems"
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
| − | <td> | + | <td>Polyethylene</td> |
| − | <td> | + | <td>💲</td> |
| − | <td> | + | <td>●●●●●</td> |
| − | <td> | + | <td>●●●○○</td> |
| − | <td> | + | <td>●●●○○</td> |
| − | <td> | + | <td>●●○○○</td> |
| − | <td> | + | <td>> 5,000</td> |
| − | |||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Revision as of 21:20, 15 August 2016
Link to this table
| Material | Cost low - high | Installation hard - easy | Longevity short - long | Durability low - high | Maintenance Access hard - easy | Best Use Capacity (gallons) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Underground | FiberglassX | 💲💲💲💲💲 | ●●●○○ | ●●●●○ | ●●○○○ | ●●●●○ | 5,000 to 30,000 |
| Polyethylene | 💲 | ●●●●● | ●●●○○ | ●●●○○ | ●●○○○ | > 5,000 | |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |