m |
|||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
*Areas that receive discharges from industrial facilities not authorized to infiltrate under an Industrial Stormwater Permit | *Areas that receive discharges from industrial facilities not authorized to infiltrate under an Industrial Stormwater Permit | ||
*Areas where high levels of contaminants in soil or groundwater will be mobilized by infiltration | *Areas where high levels of contaminants in soil or groundwater will be mobilized by infiltration | ||
− | *Areas with clay soils | + | *Areas with clay soils |
− | *Karst areas | + | *Karst areas |
− | *Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA), unless | + | *Areas where infiltration rates are more than 8.3 inches/hour |
− | * | + | *Aareas within a Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA) as defined in [https://www.revisor.mn.gov/rules/?id=4720.5100 Minn. R. 4720.5100], subp. 13., if the system will be located: |
+ | **in an Emergency Response Area (ERA) within a DWSMA classified as having high or very high vulnerability as defined by the Minnesota Department of Health; or | ||
+ | **in an ERA within a DWSMA classified as moderate vulnerability unless a regulated MS4 Permittee performed or approved a [https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=Guidance_and_recommendations_for_conducting_a_higher_level_of_engineering_review_for_stormwater_infiltration_in_DWSMAs_and_Wellhead_Protection_Areas higher level of engineering review] sufficient to provide a functioning treatment system and to prevent adverse impacts to groundwater; or | ||
+ | **outside of an ERA within a DWSMA classified as having high or very high vulnerability, unless a regulated MS4 Permittee performed or approved a higher level of engineering review sufficient to provide a functioning treatment system and to prevent adverse impacts to groundwater | ||
+ | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Constructing infiltration systems.
Link to this table
Noncompliant construction | Compliant construction | ||
---|---|---|---|
In these pictures, inlets to the infiltration basin were not protected, and sediment enters the basin from exposed soils on the still active construction site. The basin was not protected from sedimentation, and sediment runs off the side slopes and is deposited in the basin. | Heavy equipment should work from outside of the infiltration basin so soils are not compacted. In this photo, the basin has been over-excavated as designed. The excavator sits outside the basin and uses a frost ripper to loosen the soils. The same process is used to incorporate a sand/compost mix into the basin. | ||
Sediment entering the basin from exposed soils on the construction site and from the side slopes clogs the system. | Identifying infiltration areas with signs notifies staff, subcontractors and others to keep heavy machinery out, ensuring that soils are not compacted. | ||
Months later, the construction project is complete. The basin captures rainfall from a small rain event but it doesn’t infiltrate. Costly repairs are required in order for it to function properly. | This photo shows a system that has been properly protected after construction. Contributing drainage areas have been stabilized and the basin has been protected with the orange silt fence from both sedimentation and compaction from vehicle traffic. | ||
Avoid using heavy equipment to construct infiltration systems. Heavy equipment will compact soils in the system and infiltration rates will decrease or stop altogether. Once at final grade, the infiltration system should be staked off and marked so that heavy vehicles or equipment do not compact the soils. | Infiltration is prohibited in certain areas – check the permit!
|