m
m
 
Line 8: Line 8:
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
<td>MS4 TMDL Compliance Strategy</td>
+
<td>'''MS4 TMDL Compliance Strategy'''</td>
<td>Monitoring receiving waters - lakes</td>
+
<td>'''Monitoring receiving waters - lakes'''</td>
<td>Monitoring receiving waters - streams</td>
+
<td>'''Monitoring receiving waters - streams'''</td>
<td>Monitoring outfalls</td>
+
<td>'''Monitoring outfalls'''</td>
<td>Monitoring BMPs</td>
+
<td>'''Monitoring BMPs'''</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
Line 29: Line 29:
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
<td colspan=5>Evaluating compliance with MS4 wasteload allocation (WLA)…</td>
+
<td colspan=5>'''Evaluating compliance with MS4 wasteload allocation (WLA)…'''</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>

Latest revision as of 15:36, 26 August 2019

MS4 TMDL compliance monitoring strategy summary
Link to this table

Monitoring strategies
MS4 TMDL Compliance Strategy Monitoring receiving waters - lakes Monitoring receiving waters - streams Monitoring outfalls Monitoring BMPs
Monitor improving water quality and delist from 303(d) Impaired Waters List X X
Upstream/downstream monitoring to identify “hot spots” (e.g., locations where intervening flow is causing impairment) X
Evaluating compliance with MS4 wasteload allocation (WLA)…
WLA in terms of mass reduction (e.g., lbs/year, org/day, etc.) X X
WLA in terms of percent reduction from baseline condition (e.g., 40% reduction) X X
WLA in terms of areal loading reduction (e.g., lbs/acre/year) X

This page was last edited on 26 August 2019, at 15:36.