m |
m |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
[[File:Jordan River flows.png|300px|thumb|alt=MN River flows|<font size=3>Monthly Minnesota River discharge at Jordan, 2011-2019. ([https://snoflo.org/report/flow/minnesota/minnesota-river-near-jordan/almanac/ Source])</font size>]] | [[File:Jordan River flows.png|300px|thumb|alt=MN River flows|<font size=3>Monthly Minnesota River discharge at Jordan, 2011-2019. ([https://snoflo.org/report/flow/minnesota/minnesota-river-near-jordan/almanac/ Source])</font size>]] | ||
− | For most TMDLs based on load duration curves, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) recommends using the mid value WLA when assessing compliance with or progress toward meeting a WLA, as specified in the MS4 General Permit. | + | For most total suspended solids (TSS) TMDLs based on load duration curves, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) recommends using the mid value WLA when assessing compliance with or progress toward meeting a WLA, as specified in the MS4 General Permit. |
Justification for this is based on the following. | Justification for this is based on the following. | ||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
*Exceedances of water quality criteria occur only at low and/or very low flows. In this case, the permittee should apply the WLA for these flow regimes. | *Exceedances of water quality criteria occur only at low and/or very low flows. In this case, the permittee should apply the WLA for these flow regimes. | ||
*The permittee has conducted appropriate modeling to account for load reductions at high or very high flow conditions. | *The permittee has conducted appropriate modeling to account for load reductions at high or very high flow conditions. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The above recommendation does not apply for bacteria TMDLs, since bacteria concentrations in stormwater runoff and receiving waters are typically greatest under wet weather conditions. Stormwater management for bacteria should therefore focus on wet weather conditions, which typically are correlated with higher flow conditions in receiving waters. | ||
==Suggested reading== | ==Suggested reading== |
Flow duration curves use historical records to relate flow values in a stream or river to the percent of time those values have been met or exceeded. The curves show flow from high to low along the Y-axis and the percent of time when that flow is exceeded on the X-axis. Flow duration curves are often divided into different flow regimes. For example, a curve could be divided into 3 regimes based on percent likelihood of exceedance. The three regimes could each account for 33.3 percent of the curve and be labeled as low, medium, and high flow regimes. Low flows are exceeded a majority of the time, while high flows are exceeded infrequently.
Load duration curves are similar to flow duration curves but instead relate pollutant loads in a stream or river to the percent of time a specific flow has been met or exceeded. Load duration curves are generated by multiplying the water quality standard by the flow. Load duration curves represent the acceptable pollutant loading across a range of flows. Monitored values are plotted on the load duration curve to identify when exceedances of the water quality criterion occur. Values plotting above the load duration line represent exceedances of a water quality criterion.
For total maximum daily loads (TMDLs), load duration curves are primarily used for total suspended solids (TSS) and fecal bacteria (total fecal coliforms or E. coli). Typically, five flow or load regimes are used (very low, low, mid, high, and very high). The specific flows that these correspond with can vary. For example, in the adjacent image, very low and very high correspond with the lowest and highest 10 percent of flows, respectively, mid flows correspond with flows in the 40-60 percent range, and high and low flows correspond with 10-40 and 60-90 percent of the flows, respectively.
Interpreting wasteload allocations (WLAs) from load duration curves can be challenging for an MS4 (Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System) permittee. These challenges include the following.
For most total suspended solids (TSS) TMDLs based on load duration curves, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) recommends using the mid value WLA when assessing compliance with or progress toward meeting a WLA, as specified in the MS4 General Permit.
Justification for this is based on the following.
Some exceptions to the above recommendation include the following.
The above recommendation does not apply for bacteria TMDLs, since bacteria concentrations in stormwater runoff and receiving waters are typically greatest under wet weather conditions. Stormwater management for bacteria should therefore focus on wet weather conditions, which typically are correlated with higher flow conditions in receiving waters.