Difference between revisions of "Crediting methods summary"
(Created page with "<font size=3>'''Crediting methods summary'''</font size><br> Link to this table <table class="sortable"> <tr> <th>Location</th> <th>Crediting met...") |
m |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
| − | < | + | <td>Chesapeake Bay Watershed (entities subject to Bay TMDL requirements)</td> |
| − | < | + | <td> |
| − | < | + | *Reduction efficiency |
| + | *% reduction from existing load | ||
| + | *Qualifying lane miles -lb/acre reduction | ||
| + | *Mass load reduction | ||
| + | </td> | ||
| + | <td>TN, TP, TSS</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
| − | < | + | <td>Florida</td> |
| − | < | + | <td>Mass load reduction</td> |
| − | < | + | <td>TN, TP</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
| − | < | + | <td>EPA Region 1 (New Hampshire and Massachusetts MS4 permittees)</td> |
| − | < | + | <td>Mass load reduction with efficiency factors</td> |
| − | < | + | <td>TN (NH only), TP</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
| − | < | + | <td>Massachusetts – stormwater requirements (not linked to MS4 permit)</td> |
| − | < | + | <td>Reduction efficiency - %</td> |
| − | < | + | <td>TSS</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
| − | < | + | <td>Wisconsin</td> |
| − | < | + | <td> |
| − | < | + | *Reduction efficiency |
| + | *progress towards % reduction target | ||
| + | *Reduction efficiency - % | ||
| + | </td> | ||
| + | <td> | ||
| + | *TSS, with conversion to TP | ||
| + | *TP | ||
| + | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
| − | < | + | <td>Washington Ecology – MS4 permittees with TMDL</td> |
| − | < | + | <td>Mass load reduction, effective developed acres reduction</td> |
| − | < | + | <td>TP, sediment</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
| − | < | + | <td>County and City of San Diego and MS4 Co-permittees</td> |
| − | < | + | <td>Performance-based compliance</td> |
| − | < | + | <td>Cu, Zn, Pb, TKN, TP</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
| − | < | + | <td>Orange County and MS4 Co-permittees</td> |
| − | < | + | <td>Reduction efficiency - %</td> |
| − | < | + | <td>Bacteria, sediment</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
| − | < | + | <td>City of Santa Cruz, California</td> |
| − | < | + | <td>Modeled load reduction</td> |
| − | < | + | <td>Sediment</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
| − | < | + | <td>Vermont (Under development)</td> |
| − | < | + | <td> |
| − | < | + | *Interim – modeled load reduction |
| + | *Permanent – under development | ||
| + | </td> | ||
| + | <td>TP</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
| − | < | + | <td>North Carolina (Under development)</td> |
| − | < | + | <td>Mass load reduction</td> |
| − | < | + | <td>TN, TP</td> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
Revision as of 20:11, 22 September 2020
Crediting methods summary
Link to this table
| Location | Crediting method | Pollutants |
|---|---|---|
| Chesapeake Bay Watershed (entities subject to Bay TMDL requirements) |
|
TN, TP, TSS |
| Florida | Mass load reduction | TN, TP |
| EPA Region 1 (New Hampshire and Massachusetts MS4 permittees) | Mass load reduction with efficiency factors | TN (NH only), TP |
| Massachusetts – stormwater requirements (not linked to MS4 permit) | Reduction efficiency - % | TSS |
| Wisconsin |
|
|
| Washington Ecology – MS4 permittees with TMDL | Mass load reduction, effective developed acres reduction | TP, sediment |
| County and City of San Diego and MS4 Co-permittees | Performance-based compliance | Cu, Zn, Pb, TKN, TP |
| Orange County and MS4 Co-permittees | Reduction efficiency - % | Bacteria, sediment |
| City of Santa Cruz, California | Modeled load reduction | Sediment |
| Vermont (Under development) |
|
TP |
| North Carolina (Under development) | Mass load reduction | TN, TP |