Difference between revisions of "Crediting methods summary"
m |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | <font size=3>'''Crediting methods summary'''</font size><br> | + | <font size=3>'''Crediting methods summary. To access documents for each method, see the reference list at [https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=Survey_of_street_sweeping_crediting_approaches#References this link]'''.</font size><br> |
Link to this [[Crediting methods summary|table]] | Link to this [[Crediting methods summary|table]] | ||
<table class="sortable"> | <table class="sortable"> | ||
Revision as of 12:43, 23 September 2020
Crediting methods summary. To access documents for each method, see the reference list at this link.
Link to this table
| Location | Crediting method | Pollutants |
|---|---|---|
| Chesapeake Bay Watershed (entities subject to Bay TMDL requirements) |
|
TN, TP, TSS |
| Florida | Mass load reduction | TN, TP |
| EPA Region 1 (New Hampshire and Massachusetts MS4 permittees) | Mass load reduction with efficiency factors | TN (NH only), TP |
| Massachusetts – stormwater requirements (not linked to MS4 permit) | Reduction efficiency - % | TSS |
| Wisconsin |
|
|
| Washington Ecology – MS4 permittees with TMDL | Mass load reduction, effective developed acres reduction | TP, sediment |
| County and City of San Diego and MS4 Co-permittees | Performance-based compliance | Cu, Zn, Pb, TKN, TP |
| Orange County and MS4 Co-permittees | Reduction efficiency - % | Bacteria, sediment |
| City of Santa Cruz, California | Modeled load reduction | Sediment |
| Vermont (Under development) |
|
TP |
| North Carolina (Under development) | Mass load reduction | TN, TP |