Line 205: | Line 205: | ||
About half of the roof is planted with native plants, and the other half is planted with edible crops. Bees and butterflies are commonly seen in this urban oasis. | About half of the roof is planted with native plants, and the other half is planted with edible crops. Bees and butterflies are commonly seen in this urban oasis. | ||
− | This green roof uses an innovative engineered green roof growing medium, developed by New York’s Gaia Institute. The growing medium contains shredded polystyrene coated with pectin, compost, and native clay in 90:10:1 ratio by volume. This growing medium not only turns a waste product into a resource, it is also 75 percent lighter than other engineered green roof growing media, so it allows for a deeper growing media profile and has higher | + | This green roof uses an innovative engineered green roof growing medium, developed by New York’s Gaia Institute. The growing medium contains shredded polystyrene coated with pectin, compost, and native clay in 90:10:1 ratio by volume. This growing medium not only turns a waste product into a resource, it is also 75 percent lighter than other engineered green roof growing media, so it allows for a deeper growing media profile and has higher <span title="The ability of a certain soil texture to physically hold water against the force of gravity"> '''water holding capacity'''</span> and <span title="A measure of how many cations can be retained on soil particle surfaces"> '''cation exchange capacity'''</span>. |
Runoff from higher impervious roofs that surround the green roof is collected in rain barrels on the green roof and used by part of the green roof’s drip irrigation system. | Runoff from higher impervious roofs that surround the green roof is collected in rain barrels on the green roof and used by part of the green roof’s drip irrigation system. | ||
− | Twelve planted bins were installed on the green roof to test evaporation rate and water holding capacity of a zero discharge green roof (i.e. without a drainage layer). Species selected for the bins are able to tolerate both droughty and flooded conditions, and can evapotranspire high volumes of water when water is available. Half the bins were planted with Prairie Cord Grass, and the other half with Canada Goldenrod. Half of each species was in bins with a traditional green roof soil, and the other half in a growing medium made of shredded recycled polystyrene modified to improve water holding capacity and cation exchange capacity, mixed with clay and compost. | + | Twelve planted bins were installed on the green roof to test evaporation rate and water holding capacity of a zero discharge green roof (i.e. without a drainage layer). Species selected for the bins are able to tolerate both droughty and flooded conditions, and can <span title="Loss of water to the atmosphere as a result of the joint processes of evaporation and transpiration through vegetation"> '''evapotranspire'''</span> high volumes of water when water is available. Half the bins were planted with Prairie Cord Grass, and the other half with Canada Goldenrod. Half of each species was in bins with a traditional green roof soil, and the other half in a growing medium made of shredded recycled polystyrene modified to improve water holding capacity and cation exchange capacity, mixed with clay and compost. The water holding capacity of the bins ranged from 75 percent to 112 percent of a 2 year storm, which is a 3 inch storm in 24 hours in New York City. “… ET from all treatments eliminated free standing water within 8 days, with much of the water loss occurring in the first three days. Evaporative losses were greater than those of the evaporation pan during the first three days. Crop coefficients compare the water loss of the plants to that of an evaporation pan. Solidago averaged 3.86 and 3.80, and the Spartina 3.42 and 3.38 during Trials 1 and 2, respectively” (Compton and Whitlow 2006). These crop coefficients are an order of magnitude greater than those published for a free-draining green roof planted with Sedums (Van Woert et al 2005). |
− | The water holding capacity of the bins ranged from 75 percent to 112 percent of a 2 year storm, which is a 3 inch storm in 24 hours in New York City. “… ET from all treatments eliminated free standing water within 8 days, with much of the water loss occurring in the first three days. Evaporative losses were greater than those of the evaporation pan during the first three days. Crop coefficients compare the water loss of the plants to that of an evaporation pan. Solidago averaged 3.86 and 3.80, and the Spartina 3.42 and 3.38 during Trials 1 and 2, respectively” (Compton and Whitlow 2006). These crop coefficients are an order of magnitude greater than those published for a free-draining green roof planted with Sedums (Van Woert et al 2005). | ||
:'''Year built''': 2005 | :'''Year built''': 2005 |
In addition to the detailed case studies on this page, you can find additional case studies at the following links.
When Minneapolis’ Target Center Arena needed a new roof, the City of Minneapolis chose to model a sustainable building and stormwater management approach by re-roofing with a green roof. At 113,000 square feet, the Target Center Arena green roof was the 5th largest extensive green roof at the time of design and the first green roof installed on an arena in North America. The green roof mitigates the urban heat island effect, provides greens views from above, provides wildlife habitat, and improves urban air quality on a scale that is not feasible at grade in an highly urban and ultra-urban environments like the site of the Target Center Arena in downtown Minneapolis. It also mitigates stormwater runoff from a significant amount of previously impervious surface in a downtown location where space does not permit use of other low impact development (LID) (LID) techniques for stormwater management at grade. Such positive impacts on local water bodies are valuable in a city that prides itself on its legendary waterbodies - The City of Lakes in the Land of 10,000 Lakes. (For more information on stormwater management in Minneapolis see http://www.minneapolismn.gov/publicworks/stormwater/).
The design process began with a quantitative and qualitative lifecycle cost benefit analysis that enabled the City of Minneapolis to decide with confidence that replacing the conventional roof on the Target Center with a green roof was the most cost effective and ecologically sound decision over the lifespan of the proposed roof. Quantitative financial lifecycle cost benefit analysis showed that over a 20 year study period, a green roof is more cost effective than a white reflective or a traditional roof.
A state-of-the-art waterproofing membrane was used to withstand constant dampness, high alkalinity, and exposure to plant roots, fungi and bacterial organisms as well as varying hydrostatic pressures. To test for leaks and facilitate pinpointing the exact location of leaks throughout the roof’s lifespan so that the amount of overburden removed can be minimized, an Electro Field Vector Mapping (EFVM) leak detection system was installed.
One of the most difficult challenges at this site was structural. At 17.4 pounds per square foot on most of the roof, the Target Center’s dead load capacity is much lower than that of a typical green roof. The designers aimed to maximize stormwater holding capacity and plant resilience on a roof with very limited structural capacity. Because this is a public, highly visible project, designing an aesthetically captivating roof that succeeds right away was another especially important objective.
Design strategies used to achieve these design objectives include
The Target Center green roof consists of a 2.75 inch deep growing zone in the center of the main arena roof structure and a deeper 3.5 inch growing zone around the perimeter where the structural capacity is greater. The pre-grown Sedum mat was supplemented with 22 species of plugs and 16 species of seed native to Minnesota’s bedrock bluff prairies, a plant community with harsh growing conditions similar to the growing conditions on the Target Center Green Roof. As of 2012, the green roof’s 4th growing season, a diversity of sedum species, plugs, as well as species germinated from seed were thriving on the roof.
The Minneapolis Central Library has three green roofs that each have very different microclimates
The plant palette and irrigation system of each roof is tailored to the growing conditions on that roof. Drought tolerant species were planted on the 2nd floor roof that faces south, while shade tolerant species were used on the 2nd floor roof facing northwest.
To maximize irrigation efficiency, a drip irrigation system was used on the 5th floor and the 2nd floor roof that faces northwest. On the 2nd floor roof that faces south, adjacent to a south facing glass curtain wall, a popup sprinkler system is used to help cool plants in addition to watering them. Visitors to the library can view one of the green roofs from windows on 2nd floor, and all roofs are visible from surrounding buildings.
The primary driver behind these green roofs was their ability to provide sustainable stormwater management on a site where little space is available for stormwater management at grade. Further minimizing negative effects of roof runoff on downstream water bodies, the Central Library green roof is equipped with an irrigation system that utilizes a 7,500 gallon capacity cistern system to collect, store, and distribute harvested rainwater for use by the plants. This irrigation system is powered by a solar pump, and is intended for use on the green roof only during the plant establishment period and during periods of extreme drought. When the roof does not need watering, roof runoff collected in the cisterns is used to irrigate at grade landscape.
The conceptual design for the Minneapolis Central Library’s green roof connects culture and nature, weaving together local cultural and natural patterns. The concept emphasizes the influence of the Mississippi River on Minneapolis’ street grid and building design, as the flow of the Mississippi River is emulated by waves created across plant palettes of varying, undulating heights, with 20 to 30 species in each palette. Wave patterns change as different waves will be more apparent at different times of the year when prominent species are in bloom. A seasonal wave movement is also superimposed on 3D wave patterns by a purple/pink burst of color that moves west to east from spring to fall in accordance with the flow of Mississippi River. The planting design also complements the frit patterns and geometry of the library windows. The metaphorical connection of the green roof design to the Mississippi River highlights the positive impact of the green roof as it mitigates the effect of storm water runoff from the roof on the Mississippi River.
Located in a very urban location adjacent to Lake Calhoun, the largest lake in Minneapolis’ Chain of Lakes, sustainable stormwater management was especially important when the Edgewater Condominiums, a luxury condo project with 23 condos, was designed and constructed in 2006.With little open space at grade, the Edgewater Condominiums’ green roof serves both to provide sustainable stormwater management as well as an urban oasis on the roof. Each of the three 5th floor condominium owners has access to its own private green roof deck, with views of Lake Calhoun as well as the Downtown Minneapolis Skyline.
The building’s name and concept are expressed using a greenroof design that creates a calm, luxurious, resort-like atmosphere at each roof terrace, projecting an ‘edge of water’ sensibility for its residents. Short, white vegetation (3 to 6 inch tall traditional white sedums) in 3 inches of growing medium represents water/oasis in form and color. A diverse mix of traditional sedums of various colors and short native bedrock bluff prairie plants in 4 to 5 inches of growing medium represents land/beach around the “water”. Together, the plant communities visually express the water connection between the green roof and adjacent Lake Calhoun. Variation in depth of growing medium also enhances wildlife habitat value of the green roof. Wave-like trellised fence panels planted with vines enhance the metaphorical connection to the nearby lakes and screen rooftop equipment.
For more information, see Minnesota Green Roof Council project database.
Located on a roof directly outside of the St. Paul Firestation over a parking ramp, the St Paul Firestation green roof includes a wide range of plants: over 100 species of native plants and ornamental plants, no-mow turf, a small pond, and even a vegetable garden where firefighters grow herbs and vegetables for their meals. Amenities include benches, lighting, interpretive signage, a pond, steel trees, and steel trellis structures. Water runoff from the entire building is collected in a 6,000 gallon cistern and used by the green roof subsurface drip irrigation system. A Green Roof Interpretive Center and Garden Classroom, a teacher’s guide and student activity book, along with interpretive materials on the roof, are available for interpretation and environmental education (Minnesota Green Roof Council).
When Father Nelson arrived at St. Simon Stock school, an elementary school in New York City’s Bronx, the roof had many leaks. Impressed with the green roof movement in Chicago, Father Nelson spearheaded re-roofing part of the roof with a 3,500 square foot green roof. Aside from providing stormwater benefits, other goals of this green roof project included cleaning the air to reduce the high incidence of asthma, providing space where the school’s inner city students could grow fresh vegetables, conducting science experiments, and enjoying open space. Father Nelson notes that the school’s heating bills have also gone down since the installation of the green roof.
About half of the roof is planted with native plants, and the other half is planted with edible crops. Bees and butterflies are commonly seen in this urban oasis.
This green roof uses an innovative engineered green roof growing medium, developed by New York’s Gaia Institute. The growing medium contains shredded polystyrene coated with pectin, compost, and native clay in 90:10:1 ratio by volume. This growing medium not only turns a waste product into a resource, it is also 75 percent lighter than other engineered green roof growing media, so it allows for a deeper growing media profile and has higher water holding capacity and cation exchange capacity.
Runoff from higher impervious roofs that surround the green roof is collected in rain barrels on the green roof and used by part of the green roof’s drip irrigation system.
Twelve planted bins were installed on the green roof to test evaporation rate and water holding capacity of a zero discharge green roof (i.e. without a drainage layer). Species selected for the bins are able to tolerate both droughty and flooded conditions, and can evapotranspire high volumes of water when water is available. Half the bins were planted with Prairie Cord Grass, and the other half with Canada Goldenrod. Half of each species was in bins with a traditional green roof soil, and the other half in a growing medium made of shredded recycled polystyrene modified to improve water holding capacity and cation exchange capacity, mixed with clay and compost. The water holding capacity of the bins ranged from 75 percent to 112 percent of a 2 year storm, which is a 3 inch storm in 24 hours in New York City. “… ET from all treatments eliminated free standing water within 8 days, with much of the water loss occurring in the first three days. Evaporative losses were greater than those of the evaporation pan during the first three days. Crop coefficients compare the water loss of the plants to that of an evaporation pan. Solidago averaged 3.86 and 3.80, and the Spartina 3.42 and 3.38 during Trials 1 and 2, respectively” (Compton and Whitlow 2006). These crop coefficients are an order of magnitude greater than those published for a free-draining green roof planted with Sedums (Van Woert et al 2005).
For more information see Greenroofs.com project database.
The Hunt Utilities green roof is an example of a green roof outside of the Metro area, and is also unique in that it was not planted, but the owners just let it be colonized by whatever plants came in naturally.
“When the Hunt Utilities Group's Resilient Living Campus needed a prototyping and fabrication shop, we decided on a living roof for it, primarily so we could gain the experience and demonstrate it. The additional, unique green space and limiting water run off was also an interest. We learned that it requires some serious structure, and that making sure it is all done extremely well to prevent expensive, hard to find leaks is critical. Fortunately, we have not experienced any leaks, yet. We have found the space useful for solar panel testing and watching shooting stars” (Ryan Hunt).
For more information: