Difference between revisions of "File:Traditional and conservation design development.png"
m |
m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Smaller lot sizes allow the same densities as a traditional development, with more open space dedicated as a community amenity. Flexible lot design allows less roads and stormwater infrastructure to be built, reducing imperviousness and infrastructure costs. | Smaller lot sizes allow the same densities as a traditional development, with more open space dedicated as a community amenity. Flexible lot design allows less roads and stormwater infrastructure to be built, reducing imperviousness and infrastructure costs. | ||
| − | [[Category: | + | [[Category:Level 3 - General information, reference, tables, images, and archives/Images/Schematic - stormwater management]] |
Latest revision as of 17:21, 15 December 2022
Flexible design standards can allow for the conservation of a site’s natural areas and ecological function. Conservation design developments advocate preserving a site’s most distinguishing natural features and integrating them into the community of the new development. Open space should be consolidated to have the greatest recreational, aesthetic, and environmental benefit.
Smaller lot sizes allow the same densities as a traditional development, with more open space dedicated as a community amenity. Flexible lot design allows less roads and stormwater infrastructure to be built, reducing imperviousness and infrastructure costs.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
| Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| current | 17:30, 23 January 2013 |  | 490 × 916 (577 KB) | Mtrojan (talk | contribs) |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage
The following page uses this file:
Metadata
This page was last edited on 15 December 2022, at 17:21.