Available stormwater models and selecting a model
This site is under construction. Anticipated completion date is June, 2015.
Hydrologic, hydraulic, and water quality models all have different purposes and will provide different information. The tables below summarize some of the commonly used modeling software and modeling functions and the main purpose for which they were developed. The tables show the relative levels of complexity of necessary input data, indicates whether the model can complete a continuous analysis or is event based, lists whether the model is in the public domain, and for hydraulic models indicates whether unsteady flow calculations can be conducted. For water quality models, the tables indicate whether the model is a receiving waters model, a loading model, or a BMP analysis model. The following definitions apply to the model functions.
- Rainfall-Runoff Calculation Tool: peak flow, runoff volume, and hydrograph functions, only. More complex modeling should utilize hydrologic modeling which incorporate rainfall-runoff functions.
- Hydrologic: includes rainfall-runoff simulation plus reservoir/channel routing.
- Hydraulic: water surface profiles, flow rates, and flow velocities through waterways, structures and pipes. Models that include Green Infrastructure typically also assess how the BMPs managage the water through inflow, infiltration, evapotranspiration, storage and discharge.
- Combined Hydrologic & Hydraulic: rainfall-runoff results become input into hydraulic calculations.
- Water Quality: pollutant loading to surface waters or pollutant removal in a BMP.
- BMP Calculators: spreadsheets that predict BMP performance, only.
Contents
- 1 Defining Model Objectives and Selecting a Stormwater Model
- 2 Summary of Common Stormwater Models
- 2.1 Rational method
- 2.2 HEC-HMS
- 2.3 TR-20
- 2.4 Win TR-55
- 2.5 HEC-RAS
- 2.6 WSPRO
- 2.7 CULVERTMASTER
- 2.8 FLOWMASTER
- 2.9 HydroCAD
- 2.10 PondPack
- 2.11 SWMM-Based programs (SWMM5, PC-SWMM, InfoSWMM, MikeUrban)
- 2.12 XPSWMM
- 2.13 WinSLAMM
- 2.14 P8
- 2.15 BASINS
- 2.16 PONDNET
- 2.17 WiLMS
- 2.18 Bathtub
- 2.19 WASP
- 2.20 SUSTAIN
- 2.21 MIDS Calculator
- 2.22 STEPL
- 2.23 Virginia Model
- 2.24 USEPA National Stormwater Calculator
- 3 References
Defining Model Objectives and Selecting a Stormwater Model
Environmental modeling, including stormwater and water quality modeling, is complex given that the purpose is to mathematically predict natural processes (USEPA, 2009). Models range from simple spreadsheets that predict a single process such as the runoff from a single storm, to complex simulations that predict multiple, inter-related processes including performance of multiple BMPs. A greater amount of uncertainty is inherent in the more complex models, which results in more complexity in model calibration (WEF, 2012). For example, estimating peak runoff rates is a different problem than estimating the peak elevation of a water body and could require the use of a different model. A model able to estimate phosphorus loading from a network of detention ponds may not be able to model the phosphorus loading from an infiltration pond.
Therefore it is important that modelers select a stormwater modeling tool that is based on both modeling objectives and available resources. The USEPA recommends that the first step in development of a model is to define the objectives (USEPA, 2009). When defining the modeling objectives, the modelers and decision-makers should consider (WEF. 2012):
- Regulatory compliance: is the model required for regulatory compliance? Which models are accepted by the regulatory agency?
- Hydrologic process: is the goal to model a single storm event or continuous rainfall? Should the model incorporate infiltration, evaporation, transpiration, abstraction, and other physical processes that reduce the volume of runoff? Is the model required to predict large storm events (for flood control), small storm events (for water quality predictions), or both?
- Land use: is the model required for large rural/agricultural catchments or small urban catchments?
- Area to be modeled: will the model be required to predict stormwater for individual blocks? Or is a larger catchment scale acceptable?
- Intended use: is the intended use for planning purposes, engineering/design, or operational performance?
- Model complexity: will a simple model be sufficient?
Modeler experience: what is the model-specific expertise of current staff? Is there budget to hire an expert? The actual process of selecting a model is likely to be an iterative process of model evaluation, adjustments to objectives and/or costs, re-evaluation, and ultimately model selection. Potentially, modelers may select multiple models to meet the objectives of the study. For example one model may be best for hydrology and hydraulics, while another may be best for BMP performance. In these circumstances the modelers should investigate the ability of the models to be linked (USEPA, 2009).
Summary of Common Stormwater Models
The following section describes the most common stormwater models used by stormwater professionals. Modelers should use the hyperlinks provided in Table 1 for additional information on these models or other models not included in the following section.
Rational method
The rational method is a simple hydrologic, only, calculation of peak flow based on drainage area, rainfall intensity, and a non-dimensional runoff coefficient. The peak flow is calculated as the rainfall intensity in inches per hour multiplied by the runoff coefficient and the drainage area in acres. The peak flow, Q, is calculated in cubic feet per second (cfs) as Q = CiA where C is the runoff coefficient, i is the rainfall intensity, and A is the drainage area. A conversion factor of 1.008 is necessary to convert acre-inches per hour to cfs, but this is typically not used. This method is best used only for simple approximations of peak flow from small watersheds.
HEC-HMS
HEC-HMS is a hydrologic rainfall-runoff model developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers that is based on the rainfall-runoff prediction originally developed and released as HEC-1. HEC-HMS is used to compute runoff hydrographs for a network of watersheds. The model evaluates infiltration losses, transforms precipitation into runoff hydrographs, and routes hydrographs through open channel routing. A variety of calculation methods can be selected including SCS curve number or Green and Ampt infiltration, Clark, Snyder or SCS unit hydrograph methods, and Muskingum, Puls, or lag routing methods. Precipitation inputs can be evaluated using a number of historical or synthetic methods and one evapotranspiration method. HEC-HMS is used in combination with HEC-RAS for calculation of both the hydrology and hydraulics of a stormwater system or network.
TR-20
Natural Resources Conservation Service Technical Release No. 20 (TR-20): Computer Program for Project Formulation Hydrology was developed by the hydrology branch of the U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service in 1964.. It was recently updated to allow users to import Atlas 14 precipitation data available from NOAA.
WinTR-20 is a single event watershed scale runoff and routing (hydrologic) model that is best suited to predict stream flows in large watersheds. It computes direct runoff and develops hydrographs resulting from any synthetic or natural rainstorm. Developed hydrographs are routed through stream and valley reaches as well as through reservoirs. Hydrographs are combined from tributaries with those on the main stream. Branching flow (diversion), and baseflow can also be accommodated. WinTR-20 may be used to evaluate flooding problems, alternatives for flood control (reservoirs, channel modification, and diversion), and impacts of changing land use on the hydrologic response of watersheds. A new routine has been added to the program that allows the user to import NOAA Atlas 14 rainfall data for site-specific applications. The rainfall-frequency data will be used to develop site-specific rainfall distributions. The NOAA 14 text files for selected states are available in the Support Materials for downloading and use in WinTR-20 Version 1.11. The NOAA 14 text files and supporting GIS files are packaged in a zip file for each state.
Win TR-55
Technical Release 55 (TR-55; Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds) was developed by the U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service, now the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), in 1975 as a simplified procedure to calculate storm runoff volume, peak rate of discharge, hydrographs and storage volumes in small urban watersheds. In 1998, Technical Release 55 and the computer software were revised to what is now called WinTR-55. The changes in this revised version of TR-55 include: upgraded source code to Visual Basic, changed philosophy of data input, development of a Windows interface and output post-processor, enhanced hydrograph-generation capability of the software and flood routing hydrographs through stream reaches and reservoirs. WinTR-55 is a single-event rainfall-runoff small watershed hydrologic model. The model is an input/output interface which runs WinTR-20 in the background to generate, route and add hydrographs. The WinTR-55 generates hydrographs from both urban and agricultural areas at selected points along the stream system. Hydrographs are routed downstream through channels and/or reservoirs. Multiple sub-areas can be modeled within the watershed. A rainfall-runoff analysis can be performed on up to ten sub-areas and up to ten reaches. The total drainage area modeled cannot exceed 25 square miles.
HEC-RAS
HEC-RAS is a river hydraulics model developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to compute one-dimensional water surface profiles for steady or unsteady flow. HEC-RAS is an updated version of HEC-2. Computation of steady flow water surface profiles is intended for flood plain studies and floodway encroachment evaluations. HEC-RAS uses the solution of the one-dimensional energy equation with energy losses evaluated for friction and contraction and expansion losses in order to compute water surface profiles. In areas with rapidly varied water surface profiles, HEC-RAS uses the solution of the momentum equation. Unsteady flow simulation can evaluate subcritical flow regimes as well as mixed flow regimes including supercritical, hydraulic jumps, and draw downs. Sediment transport calculation capability will be added in future versions of the model. The HEC-RAS program is available to the public from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. HEC-RAS utilizes the hydrologic results that are developed in HEC-HMS.
WSPRO
WSPRO is a hydraulic model for water surface profile computations developed by the U.S. Geological Survey. The model evaluates one-dimensional water surface profiles for systems with gradually varied, steady flow. The open channel calculations are conducted using backwater techniques and energy balancing methods. Single opening bridges use the orifice flow equation and flow through culverts is computed using a regression equation at the inlet and an energy balance at the outlet. The WSPRO program is available to the public and can be downloaded from the U.S. Geological Survey.
CULVERTMASTER
CulvertMaster is a hydraulic analysis program for culvert design. The model uses the U.S. Federal Highway Administration Hydraulic Design of Highway Culverts methodology to provide estimates for headwater elevation, hydraulic grade lines, discharge, and culvert sizing. Rainfall and watershed analysis using the SCS Method or Rational Method can be incorporated if the peak flow rate is not known. CulvertMaster is a proprietary model that can be obtained from Haestad Methods, Bentley Systems, Inc.
FLOWMASTER
FlowMaster is a hydraulic analysis program used for the design and analysis of open channels, pressure pipes, inlets, gutters, weirs, and orifices. Mannings, Hasen-Williams, Kutter, Darcy- Weisbach, or Colebrook-White equations are used in the calculations. FlowMaster is a proprietary model that can be obtained from Haestad Methods, Bentley Systems, Inc.
HydroCAD
HydroCAD is a computer aided design program for modeling the hydrology and hydraulics of stormwater runoff. Runoff hydrographs are computed using the SCS runoff equation and the SCS dimensionless unit hydrograph. For the hydrologic computations, there is no provision for recovery of initial abstraction or infiltration during periods of no rainfall within an event. The program computes runoff hydrographs, routes flows through channel reaches and reservoirs, and combines hydrographs at confluences of the watershed stream system. HydroCAD has the ability to simulate backwater conditions by allowing the user to define the backwater elevation prior to simulating a rainfall event. HydroCAD is a proprietary model and can be obtained from HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC.
PondPack
PondPack is a program for modeling and design of the hydrology and hydraulics of storm water runoff and pond networks. Rainfall analyses can be conducted using a number of synthetic or historic storm events using methods such as SCS rainfall distributions, intensity-duration-frequency curves, or recorded rainfall data. Infiltration and runoff can be computed using the SCS curve number method or the Green and Ampt or Horton infiltration methods. Hydrographs are computed using the SCS Method or the Rational Method. Channel routing is conducted using the Muskingun, translation, or Modified Puls methods. Outlet calculations can be performed for outlets such as weirs, culverts, orifices, and risers. The program can assist in the determination of pond sizes. PondPack is a proprietary model that can be obtained from Haestad Methods, Bentley Systems, Inc.
SWMM-Based programs (SWMM5, PC-SWMM, InfoSWMM, MikeUrban)
SWMM-Based Programs SWMM is a hydraulic and hydrologic modeling system that also has a water quality component. Please see the full description above for more details on the model. The Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) was originally developed for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 1971. SWMM is a dynamic rainfall-runoff and water quality simulation model, primarily but not exclusively for urban areas, for single-event or long-term (continuous) simulation. Version 5 of SWMM was developed in 2005 and has been updated multiple times since. The Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) is a comprehensive computer model for analysis of quantity and quality problems associated with urban runoff. Both single-event and continuous simulation can be performed on catchments having storm sewers, or combined sewers and natural drainage, for prediction of flows, stages and pollutant concentrations. Extran Block solves complete dynamic flow routing equations (St. Venant equations) for accurate simulation of backwater, looped connections, surcharging, and pressure flow. A modeler can simulate all aspects of the urban hydrologic and quality cycles, including rainfall, snow melt, surface and subsurface runoff, flow routing through drainage network, storage and treatment. Statistical analyses can be performed on long-term precipitation data and on output from continuous simulation. SWMM can be used for planning and design. Planning mode is used for an overall assessment of urban runoff problem or proposed abatement options. Current update of SWMM includes the capability to model the flow rate, flow depth and quality of Low Impact Development (LID) controls, including permeable pavement, rain gardens, green roofs, street planters, rain barrels, infiltration trenches, and vegetative swales The SWMM program is available to the public. The proprietary shells, PC-SWMM, InfoSWMM, and Mike Urban, provide the basic computations of EPASWMM with a graphic user interface, additional tools, and some additional computational capabilities.
XPSWMM
XPSWMM is a propriety model that originally began as a SWMM based program. The model developer, XP Software Company has developed many upgrades that are independent of the USEPA upgrades to SWMM. Because of these upgrades the two software platforms are no longer interchangeable. XP SWMM does have a function that allows model data to be exported in SWMM format. Comparison of model results between the two softwares will result in similar, but not identical, results.
XP SWMM’s hydrologic and hydraulic capabilities includes modeling of floodplains, river systems, stormwater systems, BMPs (including green infrastructure), watersheds, sanitary sewers, and combined sewers. Pollutant modeling capabilities include pollutant and sediment loading and transport as well as pollutant removal for a suite of BMPs. XP-SWMM is available from XP Solutions.
WinSLAMM
The Source Loading and Management Model is a stormwater quality model developed for the USGS by John Voorhees and Robert Pitt for evaluation of nonpoint pollution in urban areas. The model is based on field observations of infiltration practices, wet detention ponds, porous pavement, street sweeping and other source area and outfall control practices. The focus of the model is on small storm hydrology and particulate washoff. The WinSLAMM model may be obtained from PV & Associates. Local Wisconsin data files for input into SLAMM may be obtained from the U.S. Geological Survey.
P8
P8 - Program for Predicting Polluting Particle Passage through Pits, Puddles & Ponds, is a physically-based stormwater quality model developed by William Walker to predict the generation and transport of stormwater runoff pollutants in urban watersheds. The model simulates runoff and pollutant transport for a maximum of 24 watersheds, 24 stormwater best management practices (BMPs), 5 particle size classes, and 10 water quality components. The model simulates pollutant transport and removal in a variety of BMPs including swales, buffer strips, detention ponds (dry, wet and extended), flow splitters, and infiltration basins (offline and online). Model simulations are driven by a continuous hourly rainfall time series. P8 has been designed to require a minimum of site-specific data, which are expressed in terminology familiar to most engineers and planners. An extensive user interface providing interactive operation, spreadsheet-like menus, help screens and high resolution graphics facilitate model use.
BASINS
The Better Assessment Science Integrating Point and Nonpoint Sources (BASINS) model is a multipurpose surface water environmental analysis system developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) Office of Water. The model was originally introduced in 1996 and has had subsequent releases in 1998 and 2001. BASINS allows for the assessment of large amounts of point and non-point source data in a format that is easy to use and understand. BASINS incorporates a number of model interfaces that it uses to assess water quality at selected stream sites or throughout the watershed. These model interfaces include:
- QUAL2E: A water quality and eutrophication model
- WinHSPF: A watershed scale model for estimating in-stream concentrations resulting from loadings from point and non-point sources
- SWAT: A physical based, watershed scale model that was developed to predict the impacts of land management practices on water, sediment and agricultural chemical yields in large complex watersheds with varying soils, land uses and management conditions over long periods of time.
- PLOAD: A pollutant loading model.
PONDNET
The PONDNET model (Walker, 1987) is an empirical model developed to evaluate flow and phosphorous routing in Pond Networks. The following input parameters are defined by the user in evaluating the water quality performance of a pond: watershed area (acres), runoff coefficient, pond surface area (acres), pond mean depth (feet), period length (years), period precipitation (inches) and phosphorous concentrations (ppb). The spreadsheet is designed so that the phosphorous removal of multiple ponds in series can be evaluated.
WiLMS
The Wisconsin Lake Modeling Suite (WiLMS) is a screening level land use management/lake water quality evaluation tool developed by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. It is a spreadsheet of thirteen lake model equations used to predict the total phosphorus (TP) concentration in a lake. TP loads can be entered either as point sources or by entering export coefficients for land uses. WiLMS can be downloaded for free at the Wisconsin DNR Web page.
Bathtub
Bathtub is an empirical model of reservoir eutrophication developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Single basins can be modeled, in addition to a network of basins that interact with one another. The model uses steady-state water and nutrient balance calculations in a spatially segmented hydraulic network, which accounts for advective and diffusive transport and nutrient sedimentation.
WASP
WASP, Water Quality Analysis Simulation Program, is a model developed by the U.S. EPA to evaluate the fate and transport of contaminants in surface waters such as lakes and ponds. The model evaluates advection, dispersion, mass loading, and boundary exchange in one, two, or three dimensions. A variety of pollutants can be modeled with this program including nutrients, dissolved oxygen, BOD, algae, organic chemicals, metals, pathogens, and temperature.
SUSTAIN
SUSTAIN (System for Urban Stormwater Treatment and Analysis Integration) was developed by the USEPA to assist stormwater professionals in developing and implementing plans for stormwater flow and pollutant controls on a watershed scale. SUSTAIN contains seven modules that integrate with ArcGIS. Hydrology, hydraulics, and pollutant loading are computed using EPASWMM, Version 5. Sediment transport is based on HSPF. Modules include:
- Framework manager
- BMP siting tool
- Land simulation module
- BMP simulation module
- Conveyance simulation
- BMP optimization
- Post-processor
MIDS Calculator
The MIDS Calculator was developed by the MPCA as an Excel-based stormwater quality tool to predict the annual pollutant removal performance of low impact development (LID) BMPs. The calculator will compute the volume reduction associated with infiltration practices plus the TSS and TP reductions for both LID and traditional BMPs, including permeable pavements, green roofs, bioretention, bioretention with underdrain (biofiltration), infiltration basin, tree trench, tree trench with underdrain, swale side slope, swale channels, swales with underdrains, wet swale, cistern/reuse, sand filter, constructed wetland and constructed stormwater pond.
STEPL
The Spreadsheet Tool for Estimating Pollutant Load (STEPL) was developed by the USEPA to calculate nutrient and sediment loads from different rural land uses and BMPs on a watershed scale. STEPL provides a user-friendly interface to create a customized spreadsheet-based model in Microsoft (MS) Excel. It computes watershed surface runoff; nutrient loads, including nitrogen, phosphorus, and 5-day biological oxygen demand (BOD5); and sediment delivery. The annual sediment load (sheet and rill erosion only) is calculated based on the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) and the sediment delivery ratio. The sediment and pollutant load reductions that result from the implementation of BMPs are computed using the known BMP efficiencies.
Virginia Model
USEPA National Stormwater Calculator
The National Stormwater Calculator is a tool developed by the USEPA for computing small site hydrology for any location within the U.S. (http://www.epa.gov/nrmrl/wswrd/wq/models/swc/). It estimates the amount of stormwater runoff generated from a site under different development and control scenarios over a long term period of historical rainfall. The analysis takes into account local soil conditions, slope, land cover and meteorology. Different types of low impact development (LID) practices (also known as green infrastructure) can be employed to help capture and retain rainfall on-site. Future climate change scenarios taken from internationally recognized climate change projections can also be considered. The calculator’s primary focus is informing site developers and property owners on how well they can meet a desired stormwater retention target.
This table classifies common models by type of model. The information in this table can be download as an Excel file. Reference or links to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, service mark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.
Link to this table.
Summary of general information for models. The information in this table can be download as an Excel file (Note the links are not updated in the Excel file)
Link to this table.
| Model or tool | Input complexity | Simulation type(s) | Public domain | Unsteady flow | Type of water quality model | Built-in BMPs | TP | TSS | Volume | Comment on use | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TR-55 | Low | Event | Yes | Rainfall-Runoff Calculation Tools | None | No | No | Replaced by WinTR-55 | |||
| Rational method (equation) | Low | Event | Yes | Rainfall-Runoff Calculation Tools | None | No | No | ||||
| HEC-1 | Medium | Yes | Hydrologic Models | None | Replaced by HEC-HMS | ||||||
| HEC-HMS | Medium | Event or continuous | Yes | Hydrologic Models | None | No | No | ||||
| Win TR-55 (or TR-20 DOS version) | Medium | Event | Yes | Hydrologic Models | None | No | No | Propose to delete the TR-20 DOS version from the list | |||
| Win TR-55 | Low | Event | Yes | Hydrologic Models | None | No | No | ||||
| HydroCAD | Medium | Event | No | Hydrologic Models | Detention ponds and storage chambers | Yes | Yes | No | It appears that HydroCAD can model ponds/storage and assess pollutant loadings, but not removal by BMPs | ||
| HEC-RAS | Medium | Event or continuous | Yes | Yes | Receiving water, Hydraulic Models | None | Yes | No | |||
| HEC-2 | Medium | Yes | No | Hydraulic Models | None | No | No | Replaced by HEC-RAS | |||
| WSPRO | Medium | Yes | No | Hydraulic Models | None | No | No | This is an old model and likely no longer used | |||
| CulvertMaster | Low | Event | No | No | Hydraulic Models | None | No | No | |||
| Flow Master | Low | Event | No | No | Hydraulic Models | None | No | No | |||
| PondPack | Medium | Event | No | No | Detention ponds. PondPack can calculate first-flush volume and aid in designing for minimum drain time, but does not model pollutants | No | No | No | |||
| EPA SWMM | Medium/High | Event or continuous | Yes | Yes | Loading, Receiving Water (limited to first order decay) | Low impact development BMPs including rain barrels, permeable pavers, vegetative swales, bioretention cells, infiltration trenches; traditional BMPs including detention basins, infiltration practices, wetlands, ponds. | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||
| PC SWMM | Medium/High | Event or continuous | No | Yes | Loading, Receiving Water (limited to first order decay) | Low impact development BMPs including rain barrels, permeable pavers, vegetative swales, bioretention cells, infiltration trenches; traditional BMPs including detention basins, infiltration practices, wetlands, ponds. | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||
| Info SWMM | Medium/High | Event or continuous | No | Yes | Loading, Receiving Water (limited to first order decay) | Low impact development BMPs including rain barrels, permeable pavers, vegetative swales, bioretention cells, infiltration trenches; traditional BMPs including detention basins, infiltration practices, wetlands, ponds. | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||
| XPSWMM | Medium/High | Event or continuous | No | Yes | Loading, Receiving Water (limited to first order decay) | Rain gardens, green roofs, rain barrels, street sweeping, infiltration trenches, dry detention basins, wet ponds, swales, porous pavement, filter strips | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||
| MIKE URBAN (SWMM or MOUSE) | Medium/High | Event or continuous | No | Yes | Loading, Receiving Water (limited to first order decay) | Low impact development BMPs including rain barrels, permeable pavers, vegetative swales, bioretention cells, infiltration trenches; traditional BMPs including detention basins, infiltration practices, wetlands, ponds. | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||
| ICPR | Medium | Event | No | Ponds | No | No | No | Not believed to be a widely used model for stormwater/pollutant modeling | |||
| InfoWorks ICM | High | Event or continuous | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||||
| Mike 11 | Receiving water model | ||||||||||
| CivilStorm | Medium | Event | No | Yes | Ponds, low impact development controls | No | No | Yes | |||
| MODRET | Not believed to be a widely used model for stormwater/pollutant modeling | ||||||||||
| WINSLAMM | Medium | Event/continuous for BMPs | No | BMP, Loading | Grass swales, wet detention ponds, porous pavement, filter strips, cisterns and rain barrels, hydrodynamic settling devices, rain gardens/biofilters and street sweeping | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
| P8 | Medium | Event or continuous | Yes | BMP, Loading | Detention ponds, infiltration basins, swales or buffer strips, and generalized devices | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
| BASINS | Yes | BASINS is a user interface to set up models in WinHSPF, SWAT, SWMM, PLOAD, and GLWF-E. These models are listed here separately. | |||||||||
| QUAL2E/QUAL2K | Medium | Yes | Receiving water | None | Yes | Yes | Receiving water model | ||||
| WinHSPF | High | Event or continuous | Yes | Yes | Loading, receiving water | Nutrient management, Contouring, Terracing, Ponds, Wetlands; USEPA BMP Web Toolkit available to assist with implementing structural BMPs such as detention basins, or infiltration BMPs that represent source control facilities, which capture runoff from small impervious areas (e.g., parking lots or rooftops). | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||
| LSPC | High | Event or continuous | Yes | Yes | Loading, receiving water | Though developed for HSPF, the USEPA BMP Web Toolkit can be used with LSPC to model structural BMPs such as detention basins, or infiltration BMPs that represent source control facilities, which capture runoff from small impervious areas (e.g., parking lots or rooftops). | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||
| SWAT | Medium/High | Event or continuous | Yes | Yes | Loading | Model offers many agricultural BMPs and practices, but limited urban BMPs at this time. BMPs related to urban practices include detention basins, infiltration practices, vegetative filter strips, street sweeping, wetlands. | Yes | Yes | Yes | Limited use in urban areas | |
| PLOAD | Low | Event | Yes | Loading | User-defined practices with user-specified removal percentages | Yes | Yes | No | |||
| PondNet | Low | Event | Yes | Loading | Wet detention ponds | Yes | No | Yes | |||
| WASP | High | Event or continuous | Yes | Receiving water | None | Yes | Yes | No | Receiving water model | ||
| WMM | Not believed to be a widely used model for stormwater/pollutant modeling | ||||||||||
| WARMF | Event or continuous | Yes | Loading, receiving water | ||||||||
| SHSAM | Low | Event | No | BMP | Several flow-through structures including standard sumps, and proprietary systems such as CDS, Stormceptors, and Vortechs systems | No | Yes | No | |||
| SUSTAIN | Medium | Event or continuous | Yes | Bioretention, cisterns, constructed wetlands, dry/wet ponds, swales, green roofs, infiltration basins, infiltration trenches, porous pavement, rain barrels, sand filters, filter strips | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||||
| Virginia Runoff Reduction Method | Not believed to be a widely used model for stormwater/pollutant modeling | ||||||||||
| MapShed | Medium | Event | Yes | Loading, BMP | Detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, stabilized streambanks, infiltration/bioretention, constructed wetlands, street sweeping | Yes | Yes | Yes | Region-specific input data not available for Minnesota but user can create this data for any region. | ||
| MIDS calculator | Low | Event | Yes | Green roof, bioretention basin (with and without underdrain), infiltration basin, permeable pavement, infiltration trench/tree box, dry swale, wet swale, sand filter, wetland, stormwater pond, user defined | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||||
| EPA National Stormwater Calculator | Low | Event or continuous | Yes | Disconnection, rain harvesting, rain gardens, green roofs, street planters, infiltration basins, porous pavement | No | No | Yes | ||||
| SELECT | Low | Event | Yes | Extended detention, bioretention, wetland basin, swale, permeable pavement, filter, and user-defined | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||||
| Center for Neighborhood Technology Green Values National Stormwater Management Calculator | Low | Event | Yes | Green roof, planter boxes, rain gardens, cisterns/rain barrels, native vegetation, filter strips, amended soil, swales, trees, permeable pavement | No | No | Yes | ||||
| Metropolitan Council Stormwater Reuse Guide Excel Spreadsheet | Low | Event | Yes | Computes storage volume for stormwater reuse systems | No | No | Yes | Uses 30-year precipitation data specific to Twin Cites region of Minnesota | |||
| MCWD/MWMO Stormwater Reuse Calculator | Low | Event | Yes | Computes storage volume for stormwater reuse systems | No | No | Yes | ||||
| North Carolina State University Rainwater Harvesting Model | Not believed to be a widely used model for stormwater/pollutant modeling | ||||||||||
| i-Tree Streets | Low | Event | Yes | Trees | No | No | Yes | ||||
| i-Tree Hydro | Low | Event | Yes | Trees, watershed scale | Yes | Yes | Yes | NOTE: Beta version | |||
| RECARGA | Low | Event or continuous | Yes | Bioretention/rain garden and infiltration facilities | No | No | Yes | ||||
| SELDM | Low | Yes | Stochastic | Yes | Not believed to be a widely used model for stormwater/pollutant modeling | ||||||
| MIDUSS | Not believed to be a widely used model for stormwater/pollutant modeling | ||||||||||
| QHM | Not believed to be a widely used model for stormwater/pollutant modeling | ||||||||||
| WWHM | Not believed to be a widely used model for stormwater/pollutant modeling | ||||||||||
| HY8 | Not believed to be a widely used model for stormwater/pollutant modeling | ||||||||||
| Hydraulic Toolbox | Not believed to be a widely used model for stormwater/pollutant modeling | ||||||||||
| SMS | Not believed to be a widely used model for stormwater/pollutant modeling | ||||||||||
| GWLF-E | Replaced by MapShed | ||||||||||
| EPD-RIV1 | Not believed to be a widely used model for stormwater/pollutant modeling | ||||||||||
| CE-QUAL-RIV2 | |||||||||||
| CE-QUAL-W2 | Receiving water model |
References
- USEPA, 2009. Guidance on the Development, Evaluation, and Application of Environmental Models. Office of the Science Advisor, Council for Regulatory Environmental Modeling.
- WEF, ASCE/EWRI. 2012. Design of Urban Stormwater Controls, WEF Manual of Practice No. 23. ASCE/EWRI Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice No. 87. Prepared by the Design of Urban Stormwater Controls Task Forces of the Water Environment Federation and the American Society of Civil Engineers/Environmental & Water Resources Institute.