Conservation buffers are small areas or strips of land in permanent vegetation, designed to intercept pollutants and manage other environmental concerns. Examples of buffers include: riparian/wetland buffers, filter strips, grassed waterways and vegetative barriers. An ordinance that requires buffers around water resources can effectively remove additional pollutants and protect downstream resources, as well as provide aquatic and terrestrial habitat.
This fact sheet provides guidance on developing and implementing a buffer ordinance.
Buffers can provide many different environmental and economic benefits, including the following.
Water quality improvement and protection will vary based on the ordinance developed. An ordinance that requires a 100-foot buffer versus a 20 foot buffer will have higher pollutant removals. Pollutant removal studies have determined a 63 to 89 percent removal of total suspended solids (TSS) and 41 to 78 percent removal of total phosphorus (TP) for buffers that are between 4.6 and 26 meters wide (Aquatic Buffers Fact Sheet: Buffer Zones, Center for Watershed Protection).
MS4s can adopt regulations wherein owners or developers are required to implement buffers under certain conditions. Conditions could be based on proximity to streams, lakes and wetlands, to waters of the United States, to DNR public waters or based on the functions and values of water bodies as identified by the MS4. The EPA provides model ordinance guidance for buffers and recommends the ordinance framework adapted below.
Awareness campaigns inform public employees, businesses, property owners, and elected officials on the benefits of buffers. Efforts can contribute to generating acceptance of the new ordinance or encouraging individuals and organizations to implement buffers on a voluntary basis. Suggested educational methods include:
The MS4, or the municipality in cooperation with other buffer interests, could engage in documenting the effectiveness of its buffer approach by conducting monitoring to see what water quality and other benefits are accomplished. Findings could provide feedback for maintenance requirements and ordinance revisions. Buffer monitoring could include the following activities: identification or measurement of encroachment by adjacent property owners, water quantity and quality monitoring (e.g. nutrients, temperature, heavy metals) at various locations in downstream water bodies, botanical surveys including identification of species cover and composition, and mapping of overall acreage of buffers implemented through the buffer ordinance.
Maintenance of a buffer ordinance requires periodic review and revision based on new technology, new research or feedback from implementation of the ordinance. Typical buffer maintenance activities include remediation of any channelization that may have developed, removal of accumulated pollutants or trash, weed control or other tasks that maintain healthy vegetation, and aeration or other mitigation to maintain the high pervious quality of the soil.
The adoption of a buffer ordinance requires an investment in training for the plan reviewer, the consultant, and possibly the public. Time consuming elements include research, functions and values assessments, and educating decision makers. MS4s must also consider the cost of enforcement, including staff and equipment requirements. Awareness campaign costs are determined by the type of materials produced and the method of distribution selected. Signs at public buffer installations may initially have a higher cost than printed materials, but can serve as a more effective tool for increasing public understanding. Assessments should include the reasonable cost of the land used to establish buffers.
This page was last edited on 22 November 2022, at 18:32.