Interception rate for various tree species
Link to this table
Tree type | Tree name | Percent interception | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
Coniferous | Red cedar | 76 | Huang et al (2017) |
Douglas fir | 69 | Huang et al (2017) | |
Red cedar | 61 | Asadian & Weiler (2009) | |
Douglas fir | 49 | Asadian & Weiler (2009) | |
Black pine | 47 | Zabret & Srag (2019) | |
White pine | 43 | Hathaway (2019) | |
Deciduous | White peppermint | 44 | Livesley et al (2013) |
Gingko | 38 | Xiao & McPherson (2011) | |
Red maple | 29 | Hathaway (2019) | |
Willow oak | 29 | Hathaway (2019) | |
Blue gum | 29 | Livesley et al (2013) | |
Silver birch | 24 | Zabret & Sraj (2019) | |
Sweetgum | 14 | Xiao & McPherson (2011) |
This page was last edited on 9 April 2023, at 17:34.