Line 43: Line 43:
 
Discussion of lessons learned through the implementation of this pretreatment practice
 
Discussion of lessons learned through the implementation of this pretreatment practice
 
==Villa Park Stormwater Improvements - Preserver==
 
==Villa Park Stormwater Improvements - Preserver==
 +
[[File: Preserver Photo 1.JPG|thumb|300 px]]
 +
[[File: Preserver Schematic 1.JPG|thumb|300 px]]
 
===Project Overview===
 
===Project Overview===
 
Narrative description of pretreatment project
 
Narrative description of pretreatment project
Line 70: Line 72:
 
Description of adverse site conditions/other construction challenges encountered during installation
 
Description of adverse site conditions/other construction challenges encountered during installation
 
===Maintenance Considerations===
 
===Maintenance Considerations===
 +
[[File: Preserver Pollutant Removal.JPG|thumb|450 px]]
 
List or description of types of maintenance practices used for the upkeep of the pretreatment system
 
List or description of types of maintenance practices used for the upkeep of the pretreatment system
 
:'''Maintenance Frequency''':
 
:'''Maintenance Frequency''':

Revision as of 19:46, 25 January 2019

This site is currently undergoing revision. For more information, open this link.
This page is in development

Project Name

Project Overview

Narrative description of pretreatment project

Project Location:
Year Constructed:
Type of Pretreatment Practice: (e.g., forebay, proprietary settling device, etc.)
Specific Practice: (e.g., rock inlet, name of proprietary device)
Practice Owner:
Practice Designer:

Design Considerations

Design Cost:
Design Year:

Narrative description of contributing drainage area, including description of land use

List of existing impairments and TMDLs that the BMP drains to

Total Contributing Drainage Area (acres):
Total Impervious Area (acres):
Watershed Slope (%):
Downstream Structural Best Management Practice:
Design Pollutant Removal Performance:

Discussion of why that particular pretreatment system was chosen for that project location, specific rationale (e.g., site characteristics, ease of maintenance, etc.)

Description of sizing criteria used to design pretreatment practice

Construction Considerations

Construction Cost:
Construction Year:

Description of adverse site conditions/other construction challenges encountered during installation

Maintenance Considerations

List or description of types of maintenance practices used for the upkeep of the pretreatment system

Maintenance Frequency:
Maintenance Cost:
Disposal Cost:

Description of maintenance challenges, discussion of ease of maintenance

Discussion of any additional maintenance considerations

Results

Discussion of how the performance was measured or estimated

Measured or Estimated Pollutant Removal Performance:

For proprietary practices, did were the manufacturer claims met?

Discussion of lessons learned through the implementation of this pretreatment practice

Villa Park Stormwater Improvements - Preserver

Preserver Photo 1.JPG
Preserver Schematic 1.JPG

Project Overview

Narrative description of pretreatment project

Project Location: Roseville, MN
Year Constructed:
Type of Pretreatment Practice: Proprietary settling device
Specific Practice: The Preserver
Practice Owner:
Practice Designer:

Design Considerations

Design Cost:
Design Year:

The total contributing drainage area to the Preserver was 242 acres, with 8 acres of direct drainage area. An estimated 30% of the direct drainage area to the Preserver was impervious (2.4 acres). The land use of the contributing drainage area was residential, with a mature tree canopy.

List of existing impairments and TMDLs that the BMP drains to

Total Contributing Drainage Area (acres): 242
Total Impervious Area (acres): ~30%
Watershed Slope (%):
Downstream Structural Best Management Practice: Irrigation cistern
Design Pollutant Removal Performance:

Discussion of why that particular pretreatment system was chosen for that project location, specific rationale (e.g., site characteristics, ease of maintenance, etc.)

Description of sizing criteria used to design pretreatment practice

Construction Considerations

Construction Cost:
Construction Year:

Description of adverse site conditions/other construction challenges encountered during installation

Maintenance Considerations

Preserver Pollutant Removal.JPG

List or description of types of maintenance practices used for the upkeep of the pretreatment system

Maintenance Frequency:
Maintenance Cost:
Disposal Cost:

The mature tree canopy in the contributing drainage area contributed to heavy organic loads, including large debris. The total captured material would likely be greater with more frequent cleaning of the system - the sump was full approximately halfway through the monitoring period.

Discussion of any additional maintenance considerations

Results

Discussion of how the performance was measured or estimated

Measured or Estimated Pollutant Removal Performance: 2,768 lbs of material captured by the pretreatment device, including:
  • 0.526 lbs phosphorus
  • Significant heavy metals

For proprietary practices, did were the manufacturer claims met?

Discussion of lessons learned through the implementation of this pretreatment practice

Privacy policy

Template:Footer

/* Manually replaced by abbott Aug 6 '21 */