Line 22: Line 22:
 
<td>&#9679;&#9679;&#9679;&#9679;&#9675;</td>
 
<td>&#9679;&#9679;&#9679;&#9679;&#9675;</td>
 
<td>&#9679;&#9679;&#9675;&#9675;&#9675;</td>
 
<td>&#9679;&#9679;&#9675;&#9675;&#9675;</td>
<td>X</td>
+
<td>&#9679;&#9679;&#9679;&#9679;&#9675;</td>
<td>X</td>
+
<td>5,000 to 30,000</td>
<td>X</td>
 
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
  

Revision as of 21:17, 15 August 2016

Comparison of materials used for rainwater harvesting systems
Link to this table
Material Cost low - high Installation hard - easy Longevity short - long Durability low - high Maintenance Access hard - easy Best Use Capacity (gallons)
Underground FiberglassX 💲💲💲💲💲 ●●●○○ ●●●●○ ●●○○○ ●●●●○ 5,000 to 30,000
X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X