Line 31: Line 31:
  
 
==Managing and disposal of sweeping material==
 
==Managing and disposal of sweeping material==
 +
[https://www.pca.state.mn.us/sites/default/files/w-sw4-54.pdf A fact sheet by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency] outlines management options for reuse of street sweepings. Much of the discussion in this section comes from this fact sheet.
 +
 +
Street sweepings are not considered hazardous material and do not require testing, but they are not suitable for unrestricted use, even after screening. Sweepings cannot be disposed at the following:
 +
*playgrounds;
 +
*children’s play areas;
 +
*residential yards;
 +
*areas where human contact occurs on a continuous basis;
 +
*areas near drinking water wells;
 +
*wellhead protection areas for public drinking-water supplies; and
 +
*sites with karst features, including sinkholes, disappearing streams and caves.
 +
 +
Prior to reuse, trash, leaves and other debris must be removed from the sweepings. This removal is often accomplished by screening, but other methods may also be used. Dispose of trash and debris removed from the
 +
sweepings by:
 +
*recycling, such as aluminum cans;
 +
*composting, such as leaves; or
 +
*sending to a Municipal Solid Waste Landfill (MSW) immediately after being screened.
 +
 +
Street sweepings that are not screened for trash and debris are considered industrial solid waste and must be disposed of at a permitted solid waste facility that can accept the waste. Unscreened street sweepings must also be stored in accordance with solid waste storage standards (Minn. R. 7035.2855).
 +
 +
If street sweepings are screened prior to being stockpiled, they are exempt from Minnesota solid waste storage standards. Street sweepings can be reused in any of the following ways without MPCA approval, provided that all solid waste has been screened from the sweepings.
 +
*Mix with new salt/sand mixture for winter application to roads, parking lots or sidewalks
 +
*Use as daily cover material at a permitted solid waste landfill, provided that the landfill is approved to use street sweepings as Alternate Daily Cover (ADC).
 +
*Use as material in commercial and industrial development projects, road restoration or construction projects.
 +
*Disposal at a landfill
  
 
==References==
 
==References==

Revision as of 15:58, 7 September 2022

Link to fact sheet on managing street sweepings - [1]

Street sweepings are materials such as sand, salt, leaves and debris removed from city streets, parking lots and sidewalks to prevent these materials from being washed into storm sewers and surface waters, and to improve the appearance of public roadways. For a discussion of potential benefits associated with street sweeping, see Overview, water quality benefits, and other co-benefits of street sweeping.

To see references for material on this page, [link here].

Sources of materials in street sweepings

The primary sources of materials in street sweepings include the following.

  • Automobiles and other vehicles. These are important sources of hydrocarbons associated with fluids (e.g. oil, gasoline, antifreeze) and metals associated with vehicle parts (e.g. brake linings, tire wear). These materials, particularly metals, are typically released at higher rates as vehicle speed increases and as the extent of stopping increases.
  • Vegetation. Trees and grass adjacent to impermeable surfaces are important sources of organic materials to impervious surfaces that are swept. These organic materials are important sources of phosphorus and nitrogen, may contribute to oxygen demand, and may act as source areas for bacteria.
  • Atmospheric deposition. Deposition is an important source of inorganic solids. This includes deposition from near-source and distant-source areas. These solids may be important sources of pollutants attached to the solids, including metals, PAHs, and a range of emerging chemicals (e.g. pesticides, microplastics).
  • Local sources. This includes a wide range of sources that may have significant impacts locally. Examples include active construction sites (sources of sediment), industry (sources of organics), and contaminated sites (e.g. salvage yards, vehicle operations facilities, waste management facilities).
  • Trash and debris. With streets that are frequently swept, trash is typically not an important source of pollutants. However, in some areas where inputs of these are high, or where sweeping is infrequent, thus allowing the materials to break down, trash and debris can be important contributors of certain pollutants, such as microplastics.
  • Exposed and poorly managed soils. Soil, when exposed, poorly managed, or on steep slopes, can be an important source of sediment. Unless the soil is associated with another source (e.g. metals in high transportation areas), eroded soil transported to impervious surfaces is not an important source of other pollutants.
  • Irrigated lawns. Lawns that are over-watered can be important sources of bacteria, organic material, and phosphorus if the source water contains polyphosphates.
  • De-icing materials and sand applied for traction. In cold climates, de-icing materials are important sources of chloride, sodium, and phosphorus. Sand applied for traction is an important source of sediment.

Composition and characteristics of street sweeping materials

The composition and characteristics of street sweepings depends on multiple factors, including but not limited to the following. The discussion describes typical conditions.

  • Source area (land use). Concentrations of metals, PAHs, and other organics, including many emerging chemicals, are higher in medium and high intensity developed land uses, such as industrial, heavy commercial, and high transportation areas, compared to lower intensity developed areas, such as residential areas. Sources of nutrients associated with organic material are greatest in residential areas.
  • Type of sweeper.
  • Time of year.
  • Buildup period/interval.
  • Soil. An important factor affecting the occurrence and distribution of pollutants in sweeping material is particle size. Concentrations of metals and organics that bind with inorganic sediment increase as particle size decreases. Thus, soil can locally play an important role in the composition of material accumulating on impervious surfaces, particularly when soils are exposed (e.g. active construction sites) or poorly managed (e.g. compacted or exposed soils, or soils on steep slopes).

Concentrations of potential pollutants in sweeping material

Testing street sweepings

Managing and disposal of sweeping material

A fact sheet by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency outlines management options for reuse of street sweepings. Much of the discussion in this section comes from this fact sheet.

Street sweepings are not considered hazardous material and do not require testing, but they are not suitable for unrestricted use, even after screening. Sweepings cannot be disposed at the following:

  • playgrounds;
  • children’s play areas;
  • residential yards;
  • areas where human contact occurs on a continuous basis;
  • areas near drinking water wells;
  • wellhead protection areas for public drinking-water supplies; and
  • sites with karst features, including sinkholes, disappearing streams and caves.

Prior to reuse, trash, leaves and other debris must be removed from the sweepings. This removal is often accomplished by screening, but other methods may also be used. Dispose of trash and debris removed from the sweepings by:

  • recycling, such as aluminum cans;
  • composting, such as leaves; or
  • sending to a Municipal Solid Waste Landfill (MSW) immediately after being screened.

Street sweepings that are not screened for trash and debris are considered industrial solid waste and must be disposed of at a permitted solid waste facility that can accept the waste. Unscreened street sweepings must also be stored in accordance with solid waste storage standards (Minn. R. 7035.2855).

If street sweepings are screened prior to being stockpiled, they are exempt from Minnesota solid waste storage standards. Street sweepings can be reused in any of the following ways without MPCA approval, provided that all solid waste has been screened from the sweepings.

  • Mix with new salt/sand mixture for winter application to roads, parking lots or sidewalks
  • Use as daily cover material at a permitted solid waste landfill, provided that the landfill is approved to use street sweepings as Alternate Daily Cover (ADC).
  • Use as material in commercial and industrial development projects, road restoration or construction projects.
  • Disposal at a landfill

References

  • Apeagyei, E., Bank, M.S., and Spengler, J.D. Distribution of Heavy Metals in Road Dust Along an Urban-Rural Gradient In Massachusetts. Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 45, No. 13, 2011, pp. 2310–2323.
  • Breault, R.F., K.P. Smith, and J.R. Sorenson. 2005. Residential Street-Dirt Accumulation Rates and Chemical Composition, and Removal Efficiencies by Mechanical- and Vacuum-Type Sweepers, New Bedford, Massachusetts, 2003-04. USGS Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5184.
  • Duong, T.T.T., and Lee, B.K. Determining Contamination Level of Heavy Metals in Road Dust From Busy Traffic Areas With Different Characteristics. Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 92, No. 3, 2011, pp. 554–562.
  • Gunawardana, C., Egodawatta, P., and Goonetilleke, A. Role of Particle Size and Composition in Metal Adsorption by Solids Deposited on Urban Road Surfaces. Environmental Pollution, Vol. 184, 2014, pp. 44–53.
  • Gunawardana, C., Goonetilleke, A., Egodawatta, P., Dawes, L., and Kokot, S. Role of Solids in Heavy Metals Buildup on Urban Road Surfaces. Journal of Environmental Engineering, Vol. 138, Issue 4, April 2012, pp. 490–498.
  • Herngren, L., Goonetilleke, A., and Ayoko, G.A. Analysis of Heavy Metals in Road-Deposited Sediments. Analytica Chimica Acta, Vol. 571, No. 2, 2006, pp. 270–278.
  • Irvine, K.N., Perrelli, M.F., Ngoen-Klan, R., and Droppo, I.G. Metal Levels in Street Sediment From an Industrial City: Spatial Trends, Chemical Fractionation, and Management Implications. Journal of Soils and Sediments, Vol. 9, No. 4, 2009, pp. 328–341.
  • Lau, S.L., and Stenstrom, M.K. Metals and PAHs Adsorbed to Street Particles. Water Research, Vol. 39, No. 17, 2005, pp. 4083–4092.
  • Liu, A., Liu, L., Li, D., and Guan, Y. Characterizing Heavy Metal Build-Up on Urban Road Surfaces: Implication for Stormwater Reuse. Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 515–516, 2015, pp. 20–29.
  • Liu, L., Liu, A., Li, Y., Zhang, L., Zhang, G., and Guan, Y. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Associated With Road Deposited Solid and Their Ecological Risk: Implications for Road Stormwater Reuse. Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 563–564, 2016, pp. 190–198.
  • Lloyd, L.N., G.M. Fitch, T.S. Singh, J.A. Smith. 2018. Characterization of Residuals Collected From Street Sweeping Operations. Virginia Transportation Research Council. Report VTRC 18-R20.
  • Miller, C.M., Iv, W.H.S., and Kennedy, M. Procedures for Waste Management From Street Sweeping and Stormwater Systems: Interim Report. State Job Number 134731. Ohio Department of Transportation Office of Research, Akron, 2013.
  • Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Managing Street Sweepings. W-Sw4-54. Rochester, 2010.
  • Minnicino, M.J., Draper, D.R., Dresden Robin Terrasciences, I., and Jersey City, N.J. Analysis of Urban Street Sweepings in New Jersey and Their Reuse Feasibility. Air and Waste Managment Association, Vol. 4B, 1993.
  • Obrien, A.M. Beneficial Use Determination (BUD-20130829) for Screened Street Sweeping Fines. BUD-20130829. Department of Environmental Quality, Northwest Region, Portland, OR, 2014.
  • Seattle Public Utilities and Herrera Environmental Consultants. Seattle Street Sweeping Pilot Study: Pilot Monitoring Report. AB/06-03381-000. Seattle Public Utilities, Seattle, WA, 2009.
  • Sengupta, S. Processing and Reuse of Street Sweeping and Catch Basin Cleaning. SPRII.01.12. University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, North Dartmouth, 2007.
  • Sole, M. Guidance for the Management of Street Sweepings, Catch Basin Sediments and Stormwater System Sediments: Final Report. Department of Environmental Protection, Solid Waste Section, Tallahassee, FL, 2004.
  • Sutherland, R.A., Tack, F.M.G., and Ziegler, A.D. Road-Deposited Sediments in an Urban Environment: A First Look at Sequentially Extracted Element Loads in Grain Size Fractions. Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 225–226, 2012, pp. 54–62.
  • Thorpe, A., and Harrison, R.M. Sources and Properties of Non-Exhaust Particulate Matter From Road Traffic: A Review. Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 400, Issue 1–3, 2008, pp. 270–282.
  • Tian, P., Li, Y., and Yang, Z. Effect of Rainfall and Antecedent Dry Periods on Heavy Metal Loading of Sediments on Urban Roads. Frontiers of Earth Science in China, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2009, pp. 297–302.
  • Townsend, T.G., Jang, Y.-C., Thurdekoos, P., Booth, M., Jain, P., and Tolaymat, T. Characterization of Street Sweepings, Stormwater Sediments, and Catch Basin Sediments, in Florida for Disposal and Reuse. Florida Center for Solid and Hazardous Waste Management, Gainesville, 2002.
  • Townsend, T.G., Azah, E., and Kim, H. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Their Impact on Beneficial Use of Roadway and Stormwater Residuals: Final Report. Hinkley Center for Solid and Hazardous Waste Management, Gainesville, 2013.
  • Wang, C., Li, Y., Liu, J., Xiang, L., Shi, J., and Yang, Z. Characteristics of PAHs Adsorbed on Street Dust and the Correlation With Specific Surface Area and TOC. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, Vol. 169, Issues 1–4, 2010, pp. 661–670.
  • Wijesiri, B., Egodawatta, P., Mcgree, J., and Goonetilleke, A. Process Variability of Pollutant Build-Up on Urban Road Surfaces. Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 518–519, 2015, pp. 434–440.29
  • Yuen, J.Q., Olin, P.H., Lim, H.S., Benner, S.G., Sutherland, R.A., and Ziegler, A.D. Accumulation of Potentially Toxic Elements in Road Deposited Sediments in Residential and Light Industrial Neighborhoods of Singapore. Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 101, 2012, pp. 151–163.