Do's and Don'ts of Iron Enhanced Sand Filters (IESFs)
Link to this table
Don't | Do | Comments |
---|---|---|
Don’t assume iron is pure or harmless. | Request mineral analysis of iron-based material. |
|
Don’t assume iron is reactive with phosphate. | Expose iron material to a solution of soluble phosphate and measure adsorption (e.g., batch studies). | |
Don’t undersize the IESF for the contributing drainage area. | Design the IESF with the appropriate size and dimensions for the contributing area. | Undersized IESFs will run out of sorption capacity quickly. |
Don’t install an IESF in areas that become inundated. | Select locations for IESF that receive intermittent flow, adequately dry out between rainfall events, and such that the outlet is above the downstream high-water level | |
Don’t install IESF where the contributing area lacks phosphate in the runoff. | Measure the phosphate concentration in the runoff where the IESF is intended to be installed. | IESF are most cost-effective when the influent phosphate concentration is > 0.1 mg/L. |
Don’t specify too much or too little iron in the IESF media mix. | Design IESF with the appropriate amount of iron | IESFs are most efficient and successful when the iron content is between 3% and 8% iron by weight. Using > 8% iron by weight can result in iron solidification and reduced hydraulic and sorption capacity. |
If mixing with a roto-tiller, don’t assume that the media is well mixed by appearance. | If mixing by roto-tiller, mix, mix, and mix 3 to 4 times the appearance of a well-mixed media. | |
Don’t ignore inspection and maintenance! | Inspect and maintain IESFs. | Recommended Inspection and maintenance of IESF includes:
|
Recommended links |
This page was last edited on 27 December 2022, at 15:20.