Difference between revisions of "MS4 TMDL compliance monitoring strategy summary"
m |
m |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<table class="sortable"> | <table class="sortable"> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
| − | < | + | <th></th> |
<th colspan=4>Monitoring strategies</th> | <th colspan=4>Monitoring strategies</th> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
| + | <td>MS4 TMDL Compliance Strategy</td> | ||
<td>Monitoring receiving waters - lakes</td> | <td>Monitoring receiving waters - lakes</td> | ||
<td>Monitoring receiving waters - streams</td> | <td>Monitoring receiving waters - streams</td> | ||
Revision as of 15:36, 26 August 2019
MS4 TMDL compliance monitoring strategy summary
Link to this table
| Monitoring strategies | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS4 TMDL Compliance Strategy | Monitoring receiving waters - lakes | Monitoring receiving waters - streams | Monitoring outfalls | Monitoring BMPs |
| Monitor improving water quality and delist from 303(d) Impaired Waters List | X | X | ||
| Upstream/downstream monitoring to identify “hot spots” (e.g., locations where intervening flow is causing impairment) | X | |||
| Evaluating compliance with MS4 wasteload allocation (WLA)… | ||||
| WLA in terms of mass reduction (e.g., lbs/year, org/day, etc.) | X | X | ||
| WLA in terms of percent reduction from baseline condition (e.g., 40% reduction) | X | X | ||
| WLA in terms of areal loading reduction (e.g., lbs/acre/year) | X | |||