Difference between revisions of "Minnesota Stormwater Manual test page 5"
m |
m |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{alert|This page is an edit and testing page use by the wiki authors. It is not a content page for the Manual. Information on this page may not be accurate and should not be used as guidance in managing stormwater.|alert-danger}} | {{alert|This page is an edit and testing page use by the wiki authors. It is not a content page for the Manual. Information on this page may not be accurate and should not be used as guidance in managing stormwater.|alert-danger}} | ||
| + | ===Other water supply wells (e.g. private, transient)=== | ||
| + | Adequate separation must be maintained between all water supply wells and infiltration systems. Unlike municipal public supply wells, modeling and other technical analysis is rarely done to determine appropriate separation distances for these wells. We recommend one of the following three approaches to determining a separation distance between an infiltration system and a water supply well. | ||
| + | *Follow Minnesota Department of Health guidelines, which specify a minimum 100 foot horizontal separation between any infiltration BMP and a sensitive water supply well, and a 50 foot minimum horizontal separation between any infiltration BMP and all other water supply wells. Sensitive water supply wells may be identified using existing reliable groundwater maps (e.g. MDH vulnerability maps, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) [https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/waters/groundwater_section/mapping/index.html County Atlases]), or by applying [https://files.dnr.state.mn.us/waters/groundwater_section/mapping/groundwater-atlas-user-guide.pdf MDNR groundwater sensitivity criteria (see page 8)] | ||
| + | *Applying the guidance found at [https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=Screening_assessment_for_contamination_at_potential_stormwater_infiltration_sites#Determining_if_adequate_separation_can_be_achieved_between_a_potential_contamination_source_and_the_BMP this page], determine an appropriate separation distance based on a mounding analysis. We recommend adding an additional safety factor if runoff delivered to the infiltration practice is located in a stormwater hotspot or has the potential to contain mobile organic chemicals or pathogens. | ||
| + | *Calculate a time of travel. This can be done if there are sufficient data to apply Darcy's equation V= KI/n, where V is the groundwater velocity, K is the horizontal hydraulic conductivity, I is the horizontal hydraulic gradient, and n is the effective porosity. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <!-- | ||
[[Coir and applications of coir in stormwater management]] | [[Coir and applications of coir in stormwater management]] | ||
| Line 222: | Line 229: | ||
*Anand, H.S., D. L. Suseela, and H.R. Nagaraju. 2002. [https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Chemical-and-biochemical-characterization-of-coir-Devi/f334def6bc1336c56200926fa0f2978bd083f07d Chemical and bio-chemical characterization of coir dust composts as influenced by pretreatment and enrichment]. 17th WCSS, 14-21 August, 2002, Thailand. Symposium 58, Paper 278. 6 p. | *Anand, H.S., D. L. Suseela, and H.R. Nagaraju. 2002. [https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Chemical-and-biochemical-characterization-of-coir-Devi/f334def6bc1336c56200926fa0f2978bd083f07d Chemical and bio-chemical characterization of coir dust composts as influenced by pretreatment and enrichment]. 17th WCSS, 14-21 August, 2002, Thailand. Symposium 58, Paper 278. 6 p. | ||
*Arachchi, L.P.V., and L.L.W. Somasiri. 1997. [https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/USE-OF-COIR-DUST-ON-THE-PRODUCTIVITY-OF-COCONUT-ON-Arachchi-Somasiri/5ffef20b58ccdfda4a8c3273bf4e5f5c62b91fc7 Use of Coir Dust on the Productivity of Coconut on Sandy Soils]. Cocos. 12:54-71. | *Arachchi, L.P.V., and L.L.W. Somasiri. 1997. [https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/USE-OF-COIR-DUST-ON-THE-PRODUCTIVITY-OF-COCONUT-ON-Arachchi-Somasiri/5ffef20b58ccdfda4a8c3273bf4e5f5c62b91fc7 Use of Coir Dust on the Productivity of Coconut on Sandy Soils]. Cocos. 12:54-71. | ||
| − | *Arenas, M., C.S. Vavrina, J.A. Cornell, E.A. Hanlon, G.J. Hochmuth. 2002. Coir as an Alternative to Peat in Media for Tomato Transplant Production. Hort Sci. 37:2:309-312. | + | *Arenas, M., C.S. Vavrina, J.A. Cornell, E.A. Hanlon, G.J. Hochmuth. 2002. [https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Coir-as-an-Alternative-to-Peat-in-Media-for-Tomato-Arenas-Vavrina/19380f37eb86e5e1957f1cc20e2d0270d7adca77 Coir as an Alternative to Peat in Media for Tomato Transplant Production]. Hort Sci. 37:2:309-312. |
*Asiah A., Mohd. Razi, I., Mohd, Khanif Y., Marziah M. & Shaharuddin M. 2004. [https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d8e6/64d378b1d38262f852bb7bc1b3fee2ec9729.pdf Physical and Chemical Properties of Coconut Coir Dust and Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch and the Growth of Hybrid Heat Tolerant Cauliflower Plant]. PertanikaJ. Trop. Agric. Sci. 27(2): 121 -133. | *Asiah A., Mohd. Razi, I., Mohd, Khanif Y., Marziah M. & Shaharuddin M. 2004. [https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d8e6/64d378b1d38262f852bb7bc1b3fee2ec9729.pdf Physical and Chemical Properties of Coconut Coir Dust and Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch and the Growth of Hybrid Heat Tolerant Cauliflower Plant]. PertanikaJ. Trop. Agric. Sci. 27(2): 121 -133. | ||
| − | *Cresswell, G. Coir Dust a Proven Alternative to Peat. p 1-5. In: Proceedings of the Australian Potting Mix Manufacturers Conference, Sydney. | + | *Cresswell, G. [http://www.cocopeat.com.au/technical/productAnalysis/pdf/Cresswelldoc.pdf Coir Dust a Proven Alternative to Peat]. p 1-5. In: Proceedings of the Australian Potting Mix Manufacturers Conference, Sydney. |
*Evans, M.R., S. Konduru, R.H. Stamps. 1996. Source Variation in Physical and Chemical Properties of Coconut Coir Dust. Hort Sci. 31:6:965-967. | *Evans, M.R., S. Konduru, R.H. Stamps. 1996. Source Variation in Physical and Chemical Properties of Coconut Coir Dust. Hort Sci. 31:6:965-967. | ||
| − | *Herrera Environmental Consultants. 2015. Analysis of Bioretention Soil Media for Improved Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Copper Retention – Final Report. 340 p. | + | *Herrera Environmental Consultants. 2015. ''Analysis of Bioretention Soil Media for Improved Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Copper Retention – Final Report''. 340 p. |
| − | *Hongpakdee, P., and S. Ruamrungsri. 2015. Water Use Efficiency, Nutrient Leaching, and Growth in Potted Marigolds Affected by Coconut Coir Dust Amended in Substrate Media. Hort. Environ. Biotechnol. 56:1:27-35 | + | *Hongpakdee, P., and S. Ruamrungsri. 2015. [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273521809_Water_Use_Efficiency_Nutrient_Leaching_and_Growth_in_Potted_Marigolds_Affected_by_Coconut_Coir_Dust_Amended_in_Substrate_Media Water Use Efficiency, Nutrient Leaching, and Growth in Potted Marigolds Affected by Coconut Coir Dust Amended in Substrate Media]. Hort. Environ. Biotechnol. 56:1:27-35 |
| − | *Kumar, P., S. Chand, and V.C. Srivastava. 2010. Phosphate Removal from Aqueous Solution Using Coir-pith Activated Carbon. Separation Science and Technology. 45:1-8 | + | *Kumar, P., S. Chand, and V.C. Srivastava. 2010. [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238136474_Phosphate_Removal_from_Aqueous_Solution_Using_Coir-Pith_Activated_Carbon Phosphate Removal from Aqueous Solution Using Coir-pith Activated Carbon]. Separation Science and Technology. 45:1-8. |
| − | *Lodolini, E.M., F. Pica, F. Massetani, and D. Neri. 2017. Physical, Chemical, and Biological Properties of Some Alternative Growing Substances. International Journal of Soil Science. 12:1:32-38. | + | *Lodolini, E.M., F. Pica, F. Massetani, and D. Neri. 2017. [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312384600_Physical_Chemical_and_Biological_Properties_of_some_Alternative_Growing_Substrates Physical, Chemical, and Biological Properties of Some Alternative Growing Substances]. International Journal of Soil Science. 12:1:32-38. |
| − | *Meerow, A. 1997. Coir Dust, A Viable Alternative to Peat Moss. | + | *Meerow, A. 1997. [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239530350_Coir_Dust_A_Viable_Alternative_to_Peat_Moss Coir Dust, A Viable Alternative to Peat Moss]. |
| − | *Ministry of MSME, Government of India. 2016. Coir Pith, Wealth from Waste, a reference. India International Coir Fair, July 15-18, 2016. 110p. | + | *Ministry of MSME, Government of India. 2016. [http://coirboard.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Coir-Pith.pdf Coir Pith, Wealth from Waste, a reference]. India International Coir Fair, July 15-18, 2016. 110p. |
| + | *Namasivayam C., D.Sangeetha. 2004. ''Equilibrium and kinetic studies of adsorption of phosphate onto ZnCl2 activated coir pith carbon''. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 280:2:359-365 | ||
*Newman, J. 2007. Core facts about coir. Nursey Management. https://www.nurserymag.com/article/core-facts-about-coir/ accessed 12/18/20. | *Newman, J. 2007. Core facts about coir. Nursey Management. https://www.nurserymag.com/article/core-facts-about-coir/ accessed 12/18/20. | ||
| − | *Prabhu, S.R., and G.V. Thomas. 2002. Biological conversion of coir pith into a value-added organic resource and its application in Agri-Horticulture: Current status, prospects and perspective. Journal of Plantation Crops. 30:1:1-17. | + | *Noguera, P., M. Abad, R. Puchades, A. Maquieira, and V. Noguera. 2003. ''Influence of Particle Size on Physical and Chemical Properties of Coconut Coir Dust as Container Medium''. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 34:3/4:593-605. |
| − | *Scagel, C.F. 2003. Growth and Nutrient Use of Ericaceous Plants Grown in Media Amedned with Sphagnum Moss Peat or Coir Dust. Hort Sci. 38:1:46-54. | + | *Prabhu, S.R., and G.V. Thomas. 2002. [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272481596_Bioconversion_of_coir_pith_into_value_added_organic_resource_and_its_application_in_agri-horticulture_Current_status_prospects_and_perspective Biological conversion of coir pith into a value-added organic resource and its application in Agri-Horticulture: Current status, prospects and perspective]. Journal of Plantation Crops. 30:1:1-17. |
| − | *Small, Gaston E , Wihlm, Spencer E , Wallace, Hannah R , Abrahamson, Jenna N , Deile, Madison P , Mahre, Erin K , Fischer, John PH , Jimenez, Ivan J , Shrestha, Paliza , Salzl, Michael T. Final Report: Soil Amendments for Enhanced Phosphorus Retention: Implications forGreen Infrastructure Design. Accessed at https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncer_abstracts/index.cfm/fuseaction/display.abstractDetail/abstract/10938/report/F on 2/13/20. | + | *Scagel, C.F. 2003. [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/43275179_Growth_and_Nutrient_Use_of_Ericaceous_Plants_Grown_in_Media_Amended_with_Sphagnum_Moss_Peat_or_Coir_Dust Growth and Nutrient Use of Ericaceous Plants Grown in Media Amedned with Sphagnum Moss Peat or Coir Dust]. Hort Sci. 38:1:46-54. |
| + | *Shrestha, P., M. T. Salzl, I. J. Jimenez, N. Pradhan, M. Hay, H. R. Wallace, J. N. Abrahamson and G. E. Small. [https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/11/8/1575 Efficacy of Spent Lime as a Soil Amendment for Nutrient Retention in Bioretention Green Stormwater Infrastructure]. Water 2019, 11(8), 1575 | ||
| + | *Small, Gaston E , Wihlm, Spencer E , Wallace, Hannah R , Abrahamson, Jenna N , Deile, Madison P , Mahre, Erin K , Fischer, John PH , Jimenez, Ivan J , Shrestha, Paliza , Salzl, Michael T. ''Final Report: Soil Amendments for Enhanced Phosphorus Retention: Implications forGreen Infrastructure Design''. Accessed at https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncer_abstracts/index.cfm/fuseaction/display.abstractDetail/abstract/10938/report/F on 2/13/20. | ||
*Varma, M.S. 2018. NCRMI’s pith technology to boost coir exports. Financial Express. Accessed at https://www.financialexpress.com/market/commodities/ncrmis-pith-technology-to-boost-coir-exports/1310190/ on 12/18/20. | *Varma, M.S. 2018. NCRMI’s pith technology to boost coir exports. Financial Express. Accessed at https://www.financialexpress.com/market/commodities/ncrmis-pith-technology-to-boost-coir-exports/1310190/ on 12/18/20. | ||
| − | + | --> | |
Revision as of 22:15, 2 April 2020
Warning: This page is an edit and testing page use by the wiki authors. It is not a content page for the Manual. Information on this page may not be accurate and should not be used as guidance in managing stormwater.
Other water supply wells (e.g. private, transient)
Adequate separation must be maintained between all water supply wells and infiltration systems. Unlike municipal public supply wells, modeling and other technical analysis is rarely done to determine appropriate separation distances for these wells. We recommend one of the following three approaches to determining a separation distance between an infiltration system and a water supply well.
- Follow Minnesota Department of Health guidelines, which specify a minimum 100 foot horizontal separation between any infiltration BMP and a sensitive water supply well, and a 50 foot minimum horizontal separation between any infiltration BMP and all other water supply wells. Sensitive water supply wells may be identified using existing reliable groundwater maps (e.g. MDH vulnerability maps, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) County Atlases), or by applying MDNR groundwater sensitivity criteria (see page 8)
- Applying the guidance found at this page, determine an appropriate separation distance based on a mounding analysis. We recommend adding an additional safety factor if runoff delivered to the infiltration practice is located in a stormwater hotspot or has the potential to contain mobile organic chemicals or pathogens.
- Calculate a time of travel. This can be done if there are sufficient data to apply Darcy's equation V= KI/n, where V is the groundwater velocity, K is the horizontal hydraulic conductivity, I is the horizontal hydraulic gradient, and n is the effective porosity.