m
 
(45 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
This section provides an overview of stormwater wetlands. It includes a discussion of permit applicability, function within the treatment train, cold climate and retrofit suitability, and role in water quality and quantity treatment.
+
[[File:Pdf image.png|100px|thumb|alt=pdf image|<font size=3>[https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=File:Overview_for_stormwater_wetlands_-_Minnesota_Stormwater_Manual_June_2022.pdf Download pdf]</font size>]]
 +
[[File:General information page image.png|right|100px|alt=image]]
 +
[[File: Photo1 of stormwater wetland.jpg|right|thumb|300 px|alt=This photo shows an example of a stormwater wetland|<font size=3>Example of a stormwater wetland in a suburban area.</font size>]]
  
==Function Within Stormwater Treatment Train==
+
This page provides an overview of stormwater wetlands. It includes a discussion of permit applicability, function within the treatment train, cold climate and retrofit suitability, and role in water quality and quantity treatment.
  
Stormwater wetlands are typically installed at the downstream end of the [[Using the treatment train approach to BMP selection|treatment train]] (they are considered an end-of-pipe BMP). Stormwater wetland size and outflow regulation requirements can be significantly reduced with the use of additional upstream BMPs. However, when a stormwater wetland is constructed, it is likely to be the only management practice employed at a site, and therefore must be designed to provide adequate water quality and water quantity treatment for all regulated storms.
+
==Function within stormwater treatment train==
  
==MPCA Permit Applicability==
+
<span title="Stormwater wetlands are similar in design to stormwater ponds and mainly differ by their variety of water depths and associated vegetative complex."> '''[https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=Stormwater_wetlands Stormwater wetlands]'''</span> are typically installed at the downstream end of the <span title="Multiple BMPs that work together to remove pollutants utilizing combinations of hydraulic, physical, biological, and chemical methods"> [https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=Using_the_treatment_train_approach_to_BMP_selection '''treatment train''']</span> (they are considered an end-of-pipe <span title="One of many different structural or non–structural methods used to treat runoff"> '''best management practice'''</span> (BMP)). Stormwater wetland size and outflow regulation requirements can be significantly reduced with the use of additional upstream BMPs. However, when a stormwater wetland is constructed, it is likely to be the only management practice employed at a site, and therefore must be designed to provide adequate water quality and water quantity treatment for all regulated storms.
  
One of the goals of this Manual is to facilitate understanding of and compliance with the [http://www.pca.state.mn.us/water/stormwater/stormwater-c.html MPCA Construction General Permit (CGP]), which includes design and performance standards for permanent stormwater management systems. These standards must be applied in all projects in which at least one acre of new impervious area is being created, and the permit stipulates certain standards for various categories of stormwater management practices.
+
==MPCA permit applicability==
 +
One of the goals of this Manual is to facilitate understanding of and compliance with the [https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=Construction_stormwater_program MPCA Construction General Permit] (CGP), which includes design and performance standards for permanent stormwater management systems. These standards must be applied in all projects in which at least one acre of new impervious area is being created, and the permit stipulates certain standards for various categories of stormwater management practices.
  
For regulatory purposes, stormwater wetlands currently fall under the “Wet Sedimentation Basin” category described in Part III.C.1 of the permit. If used in combination with other practices, [[Stormwater credits|credit]] for combined stormwater treatment can be given as described in Part III.C.4. Due to the statewide prevalence of the MPCA permit, design guidance in this section is presented with the assumption that the permit does apply. Also, although it is expected that in many cases the wetland will be used in combination with other practices, standards are described for the case in which it is a stand-alone practice. Of note, the MPCA will evaluate the need to keep stormwater wetlands under the “wet sedimentation basin” category in future CGP revisions and consider it as a bioretention system instead. Input to MPCA on this would be welcomed.
+
For regulatory purposes, stormwater wetlands currently fall under the “Wet Sedimentation Basin” category described in the permit. If used in combination with other practices, <span title="The stormwater runoff volume or pollutant reduction achieved toward meeting a runoff volume or water quality goal."> [https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=Overview_of_stormwater_credits '''credit (stormwater credit)''']</span> for combined stormwater treatment can be given. Due to the statewide prevalence of the MPCA permit, design guidance in this section is presented with the assumption that the permit does apply. Also, although it is expected that in many cases the wetland will be used in combination with other practices, standards are described for the case in which it is a stand-alone practice. Of note, the MPCA will evaluate the need to keep stormwater wetlands under the “wet sedimentation basin” category in future CGP revisions and consider it as a <span title="Bioretention, also called rain gardens, is a terrestrial-based (up-land as opposed to wetland) water quality and water quantity control process. Bioretention employs a simplistic, site-integrated design that provides opportunity for runoff infiltration, filtration, storage, and water uptake by vegetation. Bioretention areas are suitable stormwater treatment practices for all land uses, as long as the contributing drainage area is appropriate for the size of the facility. Common bioretention opportunities include landscaping islands, cul-de-sacs, parking lot margins, commercial setbacks, open space, rooftop drainage and street-scapes (i.e., between the curb and sidewalk). Bioretention, when designed with an underdrain and liner, is also a good design option for treating Potential stormwater hotspots. Bioretention is extremely versatile because of its ability to be incorporated into landscaped areas. The versatility of the practice also allows for bioretention areas to be frequently employed as stormwater retrofits."> '''bioretention practice'''</span> instead.
  
The following terms are used in the text to distinguish various levels of stormwater wetland design guidance:
+
The following terms are used throughout this Manual to distinguish various levels of stormwater wetland design guidance:
  
* '''“Required:” '''Indicates design standards stipulated by the MPCA Permit (or other consistently applicable regulations).
+
<p>'''Required''':Indicates design standards stipulated by the MPCA Permit (or other consistently applicable regulations).</p>
* '''“Highly recommended:”''' Indicates design guidance that is extremely beneficial or necessary for proper functioning of the wetland, but not specifically required by the MPCA permit.
+
<p>'''Highly recommended''':Indicates design guidance that is extremely beneficial or necessary for proper functioning of the wetland, but not specifically required by the MPCA permit.</P>
* '''"Recommended:” '''Indicates design guidance that is helpful for stormwater wetland performance but not critical to the design.
+
<P>'''Recommended''':Indicates design guidance that is helpful for stormwater wetland performance but not critical to the design.</P>
  
Of course, there are situations, particularly retrofit projects, in which a stormwater pond is constructed without being subject to the conditions of the MPCA permit. While compliance with the permit is not required in these cases, the standards it establishes can provide valuable design guidance to the user. It is also important to note that additional and potentially more stringent design requirements may apply for a particular stormwater wetland, depending on where it is situated both jurisdictionally and within the surrounding landscape.
+
Of course, there are situations, particularly retrofit projects, in which a stormwater pond is constructed without being subject to the conditions of the permit. While compliance with the permit is not required in these cases, the standards it establishes can provide valuable design guidance to the user. It is also important to note that additional and potentially more stringent design requirements may apply for a particular stormwater wetland, depending on where it is situated both jurisdictionally and within the surrounding landscape.
  
==Retrofit Suitability==
+
==Retrofit suitability==
 +
As a retrofit, stormwater wetlands have the advantage of providing both educational and habitat value. One disadvantage of wetlands, however, is the difficulty in storing large amounts of runoff without consuming a large amount of land. Therefore, the most common type of wetland retrofit involves the modification of an existing dry or <span title="A stormwater retention basin that includes a combination of permanent pool storage and extended detention storage above the permanent pool to provide additional water quality or rate control"> [https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=Stormwater_ponds '''wet pond''']</span>.
  
As a retrofit, stormwater wetlands have the advantage of providing both educational and habitat value. One disadvantage of wetlands, however, is the difficulty in storing large amounts of runoff without consuming a large amount of land. Therefore, the most common type of wetland retrofit involves the modification of an existing dry or wet pond.  
+
==Special receiving waters suitability==
 +
The following table provides guidance regarding the use of wetlands in areas upstream of <span title="Waters with qualities that warrant extra protection"> [https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=Construction_stormwater_program#Special_Waters_and_Impaired_Waters '''special receiving waters''']</span>.  
  
==Special Receiving Waters Suitability==
+
{{:Design restrictions for special waters - constructed ponds and wetlands}}
  
The following [[Special water or other sensitive receiving watershed design restrictions for stormwater wetlands|Table 12.WETL.2]] provides guidance regarding the use of wetlands in areas upstream of special receiving waters. This table is an abbreviated version of a larger table in which other BMP groups are similarly evaluated (Chapter 10). The corresponding information about other BMPs is presented in the respective sections of this Manual.
+
==Cold climate suitability==
 +
Wetland performance can be diminished in spring months when large volumes of runoff occur in a relatively short time and carries the accumulated pollutant load from the winter months. Because stormwater wetlands are relatively shallow, freezing of the shallow pool can occur. Also, freezing of inlet and outlet structures can occur, which will reduce performance of the stormwater wetland. To avoid these problems, the Center for Watershed Protection ([[References for stormwater wetlands|Caraco and Claytor, 1997]]) made some general design suggestions, which are adapted as follows.
  
==Cold Climate Suitability==
+
*Inlet pipes should not be submerged, since this can result in freezing and upstream damage or flooding.
 +
*Burying all pipes below the frost line can prevent frost heave and pipe freezing. Wind protection can also be an important consideration for pipes above the frost line. In these cases, designs modifications that have pipes “turn the corner” are helpful.
 +
*Increase the slope of inlet pipes to a minimum of 1 percent to prevent standing water in the pipe, reducing the potential for ice formation. This design may be difficult to achieve at sites with flat local slopes.
 +
*If perforated riser pipes are used at the outlet, the minimum opening diameter should be ½ inch. In addition, the pipe should have a minimum 6 inch diameter.
 +
*When a standard <span title="A low dam built across a river or body of flowing water to raise the level of water upstream or regulate its flow."> '''weir'''</span> is used, the minimum slot width should be 3 inches, especially when the slot is tall.
 +
*Baffle weirs can prevent ice reformation during the spring melt near the outlet by preventing surface ice from blocking the outlet structure.
 +
*Alternative outlet designs that have been successful include using a pipe encased in a gravel jacket set at the elevation of the aquatic bench as the control for water quality events. This practice was both avoids stream warming and is also a non-freezing outlet.
 +
*Trash racks should be installed at a shallow angle to prevent ice formation.
  
Wetland performance can be decreased in spring months when large volumes of runoff occur in a relatively short time carrying the accumulated pollutant load from the winter months. Because stormwater wetlands are relatively shallow, freezing of the shallow pool can occur. Also, freezing of inlet and outlet structures can occur, which will reduce performance of the stormwater wetland. To avoid these problems, the CWP (Caraco and Claytor, 1997) made some general design suggestions, which are adapted as follows:
+
==Water quantity treatment==
 +
Stormwater wetlands are well-suited to provide channel protection and <span title="Prevention of flood damage to conveyance systems and infrastructure and reduction of minor flooding caused by an increased frequency and magnitude of floods exceeding the bankful capacity of a channel and spilling out over the floodplain."> '''[http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Overbank_flood_protection_criteria_%28Vp10%29 overbank flood protection]'''</span>. As in ponds, this is accomplished with <span title="Water held temporarily, typically in a constructed pond, above the permanent (dead storage) pool"> '''live storage'''</span> (extended detention) above the permanent pool.
  
Inlet pipes should not be submerged, since this can result in freezing and upstream damage or flooding.
+
{{alert|It is ''highly recommended'' that when providing water quantity control in stormwater wetlands, the smallest possible bounce (vertical water level fluctuation) be designed for in order to limit the amount of stress on the vegetation.|alert-info}}
  
Burying all pipes below the frost line can prevent frost heave and pipe freezing. Wind protection can also be an important consideration for pipes above the frost line. In these cases, designs modifications that have pipes “turn the corner” are helpful.  
+
==Water quality treatment==
 +
Pollutants are removed from stormwater runoff in a wetland through uptake by wetland vegetation and biota (algae, bacterial), vegetative filtering, soil adsorption, and gravitational settling in the slow moving marsh flow. <span title="Volatilization is the process whereby a dissolved sample is vaporised"> '''Volatilization'''</span> and chemical activity can also occur, breaking down and assimilating a number of other stormwater contaminants such as hydrocarbons.  
  
Increase the slope of inlet pipes to a minimum of 1% to prevent standing water in the pipe, reducing the potential for ice formation. This design may be difficult to achieve at sites with flat local slopes.
+
Pollutant removal efficiencies and optimum effluent concentrations for selected parameters are provided in following two tables.
  
If perforated riser pipes are used at the outlet, the minimum opening diameter should be ½”. In addition, the pipe should have a minimum 6” diameter.
+
{{:Median pollutant removal percentages for BMPs}}
  
When a standard weir is used, the minimum slot width should be 3", especially when the slot is tall.
+
{{:Table showing typical BMP best attainable effluent concentrations}}
  
Baffle weirs can prevent ice reformation during the spring melt near the outlet by preventing surface ice from blocking the outlet structure.  
+
==Limitations==
 +
The following general limitations should be recognized when considering installation of stormwater wetlands.
  
Alternative outlet designs that have been successful include using a pipe encased in a gravel jacket set at the elevation of the aquatic bench as the control for water quality events. This practice was both avoids stream warming and is also a non-freezing outlet.
+
* They require more land than other practices
 
+
* They requires careful design and planning to ensure wetland hydrology is maintained
Trash racks should be installed at a shallow angle to prevent ice formation.
+
* Water quality behavior can change seasonally
 
 
==Water Quantity Treatment==
 
  
Stormwater wetlands are well-suited to provide channel protection and overbank flood protection. As in ponds, this is accomplished with live storage (extended detention) above the permanent pool. It is HIGHLY RECOMMENDED that when providing water quantity control in stormwater wetlands, the smallest possible bounce (vertical water level fluctuation) be designed for in order to limit the amount of stress on the vegetation.
+
<noinclude>
 +
==Related pages==
 +
*[[Overview for stormwater wetlands]]
 +
*[[Types of stormwater wetlands]]
 +
*[[Design criteria for stormwater wetlands]]
 +
*[[Construction specifications for stormwater wetlands]]
 +
*[[Assessing the performance of stormwater ponds|Assessing the performance of stormwater wetlands]]
 +
*[[Operation and maintenance of stormwater wetlands]]
 +
*[[Cost-benefit considerations for stormwater wetlands]]
 +
*[[Calculating credits for stormwater wetlands]]
 +
*[[References for stormwater wetlands]]
 +
*[[Requirements, recommendations and information for using stormwater wetland as a BMP in the MIDS calculator.]]
  
==Water Quality Treatment==
+
[[Category:Level 3 - Best management practices/Guidance and information/BMP overview]]
 
+
</noinclude>
Pollutants are removed from stormwater runoff in a wetland through uptake by wetland vegetation and biota (algae, bacterial), vegetative filtering, soil adsorption, and gravitational settling in the slow moving marsh flow. Volatilization and chemical activity can also occur, breaking down and assimilating a number of other stormwater contaminants such as hydrocarbons.
 
 
 
Pollutant removal efficiencies for selected parameters are provided in [[Table 12.WETL.3]]. Optimum effluent concentrations for select parameters are provided in Table [[12.WETL.4]].
 
 
 
==Limitations==
 
 
 
The following general limitations should be recognized when considering installation of stormwater wetlands:
 
 
 
* They require more land than other practices;
 
* They requires careful design and planning to ensure wetland hydrology is maintained; and
 
* Water quality behavior can change seasonally
 

Latest revision as of 19:32, 11 August 2022

image
This photo shows an example of a stormwater wetland
Example of a stormwater wetland in a suburban area.

This page provides an overview of stormwater wetlands. It includes a discussion of permit applicability, function within the treatment train, cold climate and retrofit suitability, and role in water quality and quantity treatment.

Function within stormwater treatment train

Stormwater wetlands are typically installed at the downstream end of the treatment train (they are considered an end-of-pipe best management practice (BMP)). Stormwater wetland size and outflow regulation requirements can be significantly reduced with the use of additional upstream BMPs. However, when a stormwater wetland is constructed, it is likely to be the only management practice employed at a site, and therefore must be designed to provide adequate water quality and water quantity treatment for all regulated storms.

MPCA permit applicability

One of the goals of this Manual is to facilitate understanding of and compliance with the MPCA Construction General Permit (CGP), which includes design and performance standards for permanent stormwater management systems. These standards must be applied in all projects in which at least one acre of new impervious area is being created, and the permit stipulates certain standards for various categories of stormwater management practices.

For regulatory purposes, stormwater wetlands currently fall under the “Wet Sedimentation Basin” category described in the permit. If used in combination with other practices, credit (stormwater credit) for combined stormwater treatment can be given. Due to the statewide prevalence of the MPCA permit, design guidance in this section is presented with the assumption that the permit does apply. Also, although it is expected that in many cases the wetland will be used in combination with other practices, standards are described for the case in which it is a stand-alone practice. Of note, the MPCA will evaluate the need to keep stormwater wetlands under the “wet sedimentation basin” category in future CGP revisions and consider it as a bioretention practice instead.

The following terms are used throughout this Manual to distinguish various levels of stormwater wetland design guidance:

Required:Indicates design standards stipulated by the MPCA Permit (or other consistently applicable regulations).

Highly recommended:Indicates design guidance that is extremely beneficial or necessary for proper functioning of the wetland, but not specifically required by the MPCA permit.

Recommended:Indicates design guidance that is helpful for stormwater wetland performance but not critical to the design.

Of course, there are situations, particularly retrofit projects, in which a stormwater pond is constructed without being subject to the conditions of the permit. While compliance with the permit is not required in these cases, the standards it establishes can provide valuable design guidance to the user. It is also important to note that additional and potentially more stringent design requirements may apply for a particular stormwater wetland, depending on where it is situated both jurisdictionally and within the surrounding landscape.

Retrofit suitability

As a retrofit, stormwater wetlands have the advantage of providing both educational and habitat value. One disadvantage of wetlands, however, is the difficulty in storing large amounts of runoff without consuming a large amount of land. Therefore, the most common type of wetland retrofit involves the modification of an existing dry or wet pond.

Special receiving waters suitability

The following table provides guidance regarding the use of wetlands in areas upstream of special receiving waters.

Design restrictions for special waters - constructed ponds and wetlands
Link to this table

BMP
Watershed Management Category
A
Lakes
B
Trout Waters
C
Drinking Water*
D
Wetlands
E
Impaired Waters
Constructed wetlands Some variations NOT RECOMMENDED due to poor P removal, combined with other treatments. NOT RECOMMENDED
except for wooded wetlands
RECOMMENDED RECOMMENDED
but no use of natural wetlands
RECOMMENDED
Wet Extended Detention Pond RECOMMENDED Some variations NOT RECOMMENDED due to pool and stream warming concerns RECOMMENDED RECOMMENDED (alteration of natural wetlands as stormwater wetlands not allowed) RECOMMENDED

*Applies to groundwater drinking source areas only; use the sensitive lakes category to define BMP Design restrictions for surface water drinking supplies


Cold climate suitability

Wetland performance can be diminished in spring months when large volumes of runoff occur in a relatively short time and carries the accumulated pollutant load from the winter months. Because stormwater wetlands are relatively shallow, freezing of the shallow pool can occur. Also, freezing of inlet and outlet structures can occur, which will reduce performance of the stormwater wetland. To avoid these problems, the Center for Watershed Protection (Caraco and Claytor, 1997) made some general design suggestions, which are adapted as follows.

  • Inlet pipes should not be submerged, since this can result in freezing and upstream damage or flooding.
  • Burying all pipes below the frost line can prevent frost heave and pipe freezing. Wind protection can also be an important consideration for pipes above the frost line. In these cases, designs modifications that have pipes “turn the corner” are helpful.
  • Increase the slope of inlet pipes to a minimum of 1 percent to prevent standing water in the pipe, reducing the potential for ice formation. This design may be difficult to achieve at sites with flat local slopes.
  • If perforated riser pipes are used at the outlet, the minimum opening diameter should be ½ inch. In addition, the pipe should have a minimum 6 inch diameter.
  • When a standard weir is used, the minimum slot width should be 3 inches, especially when the slot is tall.
  • Baffle weirs can prevent ice reformation during the spring melt near the outlet by preventing surface ice from blocking the outlet structure.
  • Alternative outlet designs that have been successful include using a pipe encased in a gravel jacket set at the elevation of the aquatic bench as the control for water quality events. This practice was both avoids stream warming and is also a non-freezing outlet.
  • Trash racks should be installed at a shallow angle to prevent ice formation.

Water quantity treatment

Stormwater wetlands are well-suited to provide channel protection and overbank flood protection. As in ponds, this is accomplished with live storage (extended detention) above the permanent pool.

Information: It is highly recommended that when providing water quantity control in stormwater wetlands, the smallest possible bounce (vertical water level fluctuation) be designed for in order to limit the amount of stress on the vegetation.

Water quality treatment

Pollutants are removed from stormwater runoff in a wetland through uptake by wetland vegetation and biota (algae, bacterial), vegetative filtering, soil adsorption, and gravitational settling in the slow moving marsh flow. Volatilization and chemical activity can also occur, breaking down and assimilating a number of other stormwater contaminants such as hydrocarbons.

Pollutant removal efficiencies and optimum effluent concentrations for selected parameters are provided in following two tables.

Median pollutant removal percentages for several stormwater BMPs. Sources. More detailed information and ranges of values can be found in other locations in this manual, as indicated in the table. NSD - not sufficient data. NOTE: Some filtration bmps, such as biofiltration, provide some infiltration. The values for filtration practices in this table are for filtered water.
Link to this table

Practice TSS TP PP DP TN Metals1 Bacteria Hydrocarbons
Infiltration2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Biofiltration and Tree trench/tree box with underdrain 80 link to table link to table link to table 50 35 95 80
Sand filter 85 50 85 0 35 80 50 80
Iron enhanced sand filter 85 65 or 746 85 40 or 606 35 80 50 80
Dry swale (no check dams) 68 link to table link to table link to table 35 80 0 80
Wet swale (no check dams) 35 0 0 0 15 35 35 NSD
Constructed wet ponds4, 5 84 50 or 685 84 8 or 485 30 60 70 80
Constructed wetlands 73 38 69 0 30 60 70 80
Permeable pavement (with underdrain) 74 41 74 0 NSD NSD NSD NSD
Green roofs 85 0 0 0 NSD NSD NSD NSD
Vegetated (grass) filter 68 0 0 0 NSD NSD NSD NSD
Harvest and reuse Removal is 100% for captured water that is infiltrated. For water captured and routed to another practice, use the removal values for that practice.

TSS=Total suspended solids, TP=Total phosphorus, PP=Particulate phosphorus, DP=Dissolved phosphorus, TN=Total nitrogen
1Data for metals is based on the average of data for zinc and copper
2BMPs designed to infiltrate stormwater runoff, such as infiltration basin/trench, bioinfiltration, permeable pavement with no underdrain, tree trenches with no underdrain, and BMPs with raised underdrains.
3Pollutant removal is 100 percent for the volume infiltrated, 0 for water bypassing the BMP. For filtered water, see values for other BMPs in the table.
4Dry ponds do not receive credit for volume or pollutant removal
5Removal is for Design Level 2. If an iron-enhanced pond bench is included, an additional 40 percent credit is given for dissolved phosphorus. Use the lower values if no iron bench exists and the higher value if an iron bench exists.
6Lower values are for Tier 1 design. Higher values are for Tier 2 design.


Typical BMP best attainable effluent concentrations. Values from ASCE BMP database and Winer 2000
Link to this table

Practice TSS (mg/l) TP (mg/l) TN (mg/l) Cu (ug/l) Zn (ug/l)
Wetlands 6 0.2 1.7 3.0 50


Limitations

The following general limitations should be recognized when considering installation of stormwater wetlands.

  • They require more land than other practices
  • They requires careful design and planning to ensure wetland hydrology is maintained
  • Water quality behavior can change seasonally


Related pages

This page was last edited on 11 August 2022, at 19:32.