Difference between revisions of "Pollutant removal percentages for filtration BMPs"
m |
m |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
<td>35</td> | <td>35</td> | ||
<td>80</td> | <td>80</td> | ||
| − | <td> | + | <td>50</td> |
<td>80</td> | <td>80</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
<td>35</td> | <td>35</td> | ||
<td>80</td> | <td>80</td> | ||
| − | <td> | + | <td>0</td> |
<td>80</td> | <td>80</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Revision as of 21:44, 27 January 2015
Pollutant removal percentages for filtration BMPs.
Link to this table
| Practice | TSS Low-Med-High | TP Low-Med-High | TN4 | Metals3 (average of Zn and Cu) | Bacteria3 | Hydrocarbons3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Media Filter1 | 75-85-90 | 30-50-55 | 35 | 80 | 50 | 80 |
| Vegetative Filter2 | see here | see here | 35 | 80 | 0 | 80 |
1 For example, sand, mixed sand/peat and other geologic media
2 Grass filter/swale
3 Not enough information given in databases to differentiate type of filter so both combined for this entry