m
m
Line 6: Line 6:
 
<th>Suitability in karst regions</th>
 
<th>Suitability in karst regions</th>
 
<th>'''Karst considerations'''</th>
 
<th>'''Karst considerations'''</th>
 +
<th>[https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=MN_CSW_Permit_Section_16_Infiltration_Systems Construction stormwater permit restriction<sup>1</sup>]</th>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
Line 14: Line 15:
 
*Discharge point from the disconnect should extend at least 15 feet from any building foundation.
 
*Discharge point from the disconnect should extend at least 15 feet from any building foundation.
 
</td>
 
</td>
 +
<td>No</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
Line 23: Line 25:
 
*Larger designs that rely on exfiltration of treated runoff into the soils below are not recommended.
 
*Larger designs that rely on exfiltration of treated runoff into the soils below are not recommended.
 
</td>
 
</td>
 +
<td>No</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
Line 31: Line 34:
 
*Overflow of tank should extend at least 15 feet from building foundation.
 
*Overflow of tank should extend at least 15 feet from building foundation.
 
</td>
 
</td>
 +
<td>No</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
Line 39: Line 43:
 
*Runoff should be spread diffusely across landscape.
 
*Runoff should be spread diffusely across landscape.
 
</td>
 
</td>
 +
<td>No</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
Line 45: Line 50:
 
<td>
 
<td>
 
*Runoff should be spread diffusely across landscape.</td>
 
*Runoff should be spread diffusely across landscape.</td>
 +
<td>No</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
Line 54: Line 60:
 
*Do not incorporate check dams unless the swale or channel incorporates an underdrain.  Otherwise small areas of infiltration would develop in the zones upgradient of the check dam where the water is captured without adequate outlet.
 
*Do not incorporate check dams unless the swale or channel incorporates an underdrain.  Otherwise small areas of infiltration would develop in the zones upgradient of the check dam where the water is captured without adequate outlet.
 
</td>
 
</td>
 +
<td>Yes if designed for infiltration</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
Line 66: Line 73:
 
<td>
 
<td>
 
*Recommended practice in areas of shallow bedrock and soil.</td>
 
*Recommended practice in areas of shallow bedrock and soil.</td>
 +
<td>No</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
Line 71: Line 79:
 
<td>Adequate</td>
 
<td>Adequate</td>
 
<td></td>
 
<td></td>
 +
<td>No</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
Line 79: Line 88:
 
*Not recommended for sites identified as a stormwater hotspot.
 
*Not recommended for sites identified as a stormwater hotspot.
 
</td>
 
</td>
 +
<td>Yes</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
Line 84: Line 94:
 
<td>Adequate</td>
 
<td>Adequate</td>
 
<td></td>
 
<td></td>
 +
<td>Yes if designed for infiltration (no underdrain)</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
Line 94: Line 105:
 
*Incorporate pre-treatment to limit risk of groundwater contamination in the event of future failure of the BMP associated with development of a karst feature. Local review authority should be consulted for approval.
 
*Incorporate pre-treatment to limit risk of groundwater contamination in the event of future failure of the BMP associated with development of a karst feature. Local review authority should be consulted for approval.
 
</td>
 
</td>
 +
<td>Yes</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
Line 104: Line 116:
 
{{alert|If the CSW permit applies, liners are required in areas of active karst|alert-danger}}
 
{{alert|If the CSW permit applies, liners are required in areas of active karst|alert-danger}}
 
</td>
 
</td>
 +
<td>No</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
Line 111: Line 124:
 
*Requires larger surface area to drainage area ratios to limit the depth of the basin or pond. If analysis shows that the soils can support the weight of a pond then a [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Liners_for_stormwater_management liner] should be used to prevent infiltration
 
*Requires larger surface area to drainage area ratios to limit the depth of the basin or pond. If analysis shows that the soils can support the weight of a pond then a [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Liners_for_stormwater_management liner] should be used to prevent infiltration
 
{{alert|If the CSW permit applies, liners are required in areas of active karst|alert-danger}}</td>
 
{{alert|If the CSW permit applies, liners are required in areas of active karst|alert-danger}}</td>
 +
<td>No</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
Line 117: Line 131:
 
<td>Not feasible</td>
 
<td>Not feasible</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 +
<td>No</td>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
 
<td>Large scale infiltration</td>
 
<td>Large scale infiltration</td>
Line 122: Line 137:
 
<td>
 
<td>
 
*Use small scale infiltration practices instead.</td>
 
*Use small scale infiltration practices instead.</td>
 +
<td>Yes</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
</table>
 
</table>
 
+
<font size=1><sup>1</sup>[https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=MN_CSW_Permit_Section_16_Infiltration_Systems#16.20 Section 16.20 of the CSW Permit] prohibits prohibits permittees from constructing infiltration systems in areas within 1,000 feet upgradient or 100 feet downgradient of [[Karst|active karst features]].</font size>
 +
 
<noinclude>[[category:BMP information and selection‏‎]]</noinclude>
 
<noinclude>[[category:BMP information and selection‏‎]]</noinclude>

Revision as of 18:49, 1 March 2021

Stormwater BMP selection in karst settings. Sources Karst Working Group, 2009; Minnesota Stormwater Wiki; Tennessee Permanent Stormwater Management and Design Guidance.
Link to this table

BMP Suitability in karst regions Karst considerations Construction stormwater permit restriction1
Impervious area disconnect Preferred
  • Strongly recommended for most residential lots less than 6,000 square feet.
  • Discharge point from the disconnect should extend at least 15 feet from any building foundation.
No
Bioretention with underdrain (biofiltration) Preferred
  • Requires 3 foot minimum separation distance between practice bottom and bedrock. If this is not possible, an underdrain should be used to convey the water away.
  • It’s recommended that the drainage area to an individual bioretention BMP be kept less than 20,000 square feet.
  • Larger designs that rely on exfiltration of treated runoff into the soils below are not recommended.
No
Rain tank/cistern Preferred
  • Above ground tanks are preferred to below ground.
  • Overflow of tank should extend at least 15 feet from building foundation.
No
Rooftop disconnect Preferred
  • 15 feet foundation set back.
  • Runoff should be spread diffusely across landscape.
No
Green roofs Preferred
  • Runoff should be spread diffusely across landscape.
No
Dry swale or grassed channel Preferred
  • Line with underdrains.
  • Incorporate compost amendments into the bottom of the channel to improve runoff reduction for vegetative uptake, and transpiration.
  • Do not incorporate check dams unless the swale or channel incorporates an underdrain. Otherwise small areas of infiltration would develop in the zones upgradient of the check dam where the water is captured without adequate outlet.
Yes if designed for infiltration
Media filter Preferred
  • Recommended practice in areas of shallow bedrock and soil.
Vegetative filter Preferred
  • Recommended practice in areas of shallow bedrock and soil.
No
Soil compost amendment Adequate No
Small scale infiltration/micro-bioinfiltration Adequate
  • Create multiple small sized infiltration BMPs to infiltrate impervious areas of 250 to 2,500 square feet.
  • Not recommended for sites identified as a stormwater hotspot.
Yes
Permeable pavement Adequate Yes if designed for infiltration (no underdrain)
Infiltration trench or basin Adequate
  • Surface area to depth ratios of practices may need to be larger than typical basin designs to minimize depth of the BMP.
  • Confirm suitability with supporting geotechnical investigations and calculations.
  • Not recommended for sites identified as a stormwater hotspot.
  • Incorporate pre-treatment to limit risk of groundwater contamination in the event of future failure of the BMP associated with development of a karst feature. Local review authority should be consulted for approval.
Yes
Constructed wetlands Adequate
  • Requires larger surface area to drainage area ratios to limit the depth of the wetland.
  • Bedrock should act like a liner and help to maintain a permanent pool, unless fracture zone is present.
  • Consider using liner and liner cells.
Warning: If the CSW permit applies, liners are required in areas of active karst
No
Dry extended detention (ED) ponds and wet ponds Adequate
  • Requires larger surface area to drainage area ratios to limit the depth of the basin or pond. If analysis shows that the soils can support the weight of a pond then a liner should be used to prevent infiltration
Warning: If the CSW permit applies, liners are required in areas of active karst
No
Wet swale Discouraged Not feasible
No
Large scale infiltration Discouraged
  • Use small scale infiltration practices instead.
Yes

1Section 16.20 of the CSW Permit prohibits prohibits permittees from constructing infiltration systems in areas within 1,000 feet upgradient or 100 feet downgradient of active karst features.