m
m
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
<th>Disadvantages</th>
 
<th>Disadvantages</th>
 
<th>Data collected</th>
 
<th>Data collected</th>
<th>Relative TP load reduction credit</th>
+
<th>Relative TP load reduction credit potential<sup>1</sup></th>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
Line 18: Line 18:
 
<td>Low accuracy, reliant on self-reporting</td>
 
<td>Low accuracy, reliant on self-reporting</td>
 
<td>Miles swept</td>
 
<td>Miles swept</td>
<td>Low potential due to low accuracy and no strong research-based relationships between miles swept and TP load</td>
+
<td>Low potential</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
Line 25: Line 25:
 
<td>More expensive than manual logging (hardware, software, data interpretation)</td>
 
<td>More expensive than manual logging (hardware, software, data interpretation)</td>
 
<td>Miles swept</td>
 
<td>Miles swept</td>
<td>Low potential due to no strong research-based relationships between miles swept and TP load</td>
+
<td>Low potential</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
Line 32: Line 32:
 
<td>Requires special equipment (scale)</td>
 
<td>Requires special equipment (scale)</td>
 
<td>Wet mass of swept materials</td>
 
<td>Wet mass of swept materials</td>
<td>High potential due to research-based relationships between wet mass and TP load </td>
+
<td>High potential</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
Line 39: Line 39:
 
<td>Pilot study may be initially time intensive and costly</td>
 
<td>Pilot study may be initially time intensive and costly</td>
 
<td>Wet mass of swept materials plus initial lab work for dry basis moisture content, and optionally organic matter content, TP content</td>
 
<td>Wet mass of swept materials plus initial lab work for dry basis moisture content, and optionally organic matter content, TP content</td>
<td>High potential and highest accuracy due to research-based and site-specific relationships between laboratory measurements and TP load</td>
+
<td>High potential and high accuracy</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
Line 49: Line 49:
 
<td>Not currently applicable for TP load reduction credit by MPCA</td>
 
<td>Not currently applicable for TP load reduction credit by MPCA</td>
 
<td>Count of hopper dumps</td>
 
<td>Count of hopper dumps</td>
<td>No potential currently due to no strong research-based relationships between volume and TP load</td>
+
<td>No potential</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
Line 56: Line 56:
 
<td>Pilot study may be initially time intensive and costly</td>
 
<td>Pilot study may be initially time intensive and costly</td>
 
<td>Count of hopper dumps plus initial lab work in developing volume/mass relationship</td>
 
<td>Count of hopper dumps plus initial lab work in developing volume/mass relationship</td>
<td>High potential pending MPCA approval of data-derived volume-mass relationship</td>
+
<td>High potential</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td colspan=5><font size=1><sup>1</sup>Relative TP Load Reduction Credit Ratings based on the MPCA Street Sweeping Credit Calculator:<br>
 +
*High Credit: high accuracy, research-based and site-specific correlations between lab measurements and TP load
 +
*Moderate Credit: moderate accuracy in tracking method that can be improved upon with lab analyses
 +
*Low Credit: low accuracy and/or lack of strong research-based relationships
 +
*No Current Credit: currently pending MPCA approval of data-derived volume-mass relationship
 +
*No Credit: no crediting option or plan to develop such a method based on research to date</font size>
 +
</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
</table>
 
</table>
  
 
[[Category:Level 3 - General information, reference, tables, images, and archives/Tables/Pollution prevention and source control]]
 
[[Category:Level 3 - General information, reference, tables, images, and archives/Tables/Pollution prevention and source control]]

Latest revision as of 22:33, 20 December 2022

Summary of street sweeping tracking methodologies

Link to this table

Tracking method Advantages Disadvantages Data collected Relative TP load reduction credit potential1
Distance Swept: Manual Logging
  • Inexpensive
  • Low-tech
Low accuracy, reliant on self-reporting Miles swept Low potential
Distance Swept: GPS Records Automated tracking More expensive than manual logging (hardware, software, data interpretation) Miles swept Low potential
Debris Collected: Mass Measurement Once method is established, easy to track Requires special equipment (scale) Wet mass of swept materials High potential
Debris Collected: Mass Measurements with Lab Analysis More representative of actual material swept Pilot study may be initially time intensive and costly Wet mass of swept materials plus initial lab work for dry basis moisture content, and optionally organic matter content, TP content High potential and high accuracy
Debris Collected: Volume Measurement
  • Inexpensive
  • Low-tech
Not currently applicable for TP load reduction credit by MPCA Count of hopper dumps No potential
Debris Collected: Volume-Mass Relationship Provides pathway for TP load reduction credit based on a low-tech measurement Pilot study may be initially time intensive and costly Count of hopper dumps plus initial lab work in developing volume/mass relationship High potential
1Relative TP Load Reduction Credit Ratings based on the MPCA Street Sweeping Credit Calculator:
  • High Credit: high accuracy, research-based and site-specific correlations between lab measurements and TP load
  • Moderate Credit: moderate accuracy in tracking method that can be improved upon with lab analyses
  • Low Credit: low accuracy and/or lack of strong research-based relationships
  • No Current Credit: currently pending MPCA approval of data-derived volume-mass relationship
  • No Credit: no crediting option or plan to develop such a method based on research to date

This page was last edited on 20 December 2022, at 22:33.