m |
|||
(25 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | [[File:Concrete check dams.jpg|300px|thumb|alt=photo concrete check dams|<font size=3>Impermeable concrete check dams. Photo courtesy Limnotech.</font size>]] | |
− | + | {{alert|Swales can be an important tool for retention and detention of stormwater runoff. Depending on design and construction, swales may provide additional benefits, including cleaner air, carbon sequestration, improved biological habitat, and aesthetic value. See the section [[Green Stormwater Infrastructure (GSI) and sustainable stormwater management]].|alert-success}} | |
A check dam is a structure installed perpendicular to flow in a natural or manmade conveyance channel to reduce flow velocity. By slowing flow velocities, check dams can serve multiple functions including reduction of channel scour and erosion, enhancement of sediment trapping, and greater treatment of the water quality control volume via enhanced water detention or retention. Typical check dam materials include rock, earth, wood, and concrete. | A check dam is a structure installed perpendicular to flow in a natural or manmade conveyance channel to reduce flow velocity. By slowing flow velocities, check dams can serve multiple functions including reduction of channel scour and erosion, enhancement of sediment trapping, and greater treatment of the water quality control volume via enhanced water detention or retention. Typical check dam materials include rock, earth, wood, and concrete. | ||
− | {{alert|Permanent | + | {{alert|Permanent check dams are discussed on this page. For information on temporary check dams used for sediment control, [[Sediment control practices - Check dams (ditch checks, ditch dikes)|link here]].|alert-info}} |
==Applicability== | ==Applicability== | ||
− | Incorporation of check dams into swale design allows treatment of a portion or all of the water quality volume ( | + | Incorporation of check dams into swale design allows treatment of a portion or all of the [https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=Glossary#W water quality volume] (V<sub>wq</sub>) within a series of cells created by the check dams. Check dams are relatively inexpensive and easy to install. They are not approved for use in regulated waterbodies (i.e., Waters of the State) without permit coverage from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers under [https://www.epa.gov/cwa-404/section-404-permit-program Section 404 of the Clean Water Act]. MPCA water quality certification requirements also apply. |
===Site applicability=== | ===Site applicability=== | ||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
*Hydraulic capacity of the channel can be reduced when check dams are in place. | *Hydraulic capacity of the channel can be reduced when check dams are in place. | ||
*Check dams may create turbulence downstream, causing erosion of the channel banks. | *Check dams may create turbulence downstream, causing erosion of the channel banks. | ||
− | *Ponded water may kill grass or other vegetation in dry swales, wet swales, and stormwater step pools. | + | *Ponded water may kill grass or other vegetation in [https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=Dry_swale_(Grass_swale) dry swales], [https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=Wet_swale_(wetland_channel) wet swales], and [https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=High-gradient_stormwater_step-pool_swale stormwater step pools]. |
*Check dams may be an obstruction to construction equipment. | *Check dams may be an obstruction to construction equipment. | ||
===MPCA permit applicability=== | ===MPCA permit applicability=== | ||
One of the goals of this Manual is to facilitate understanding of and compliance with the [https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Construction_stormwater_permit MPCA Construction General Permit] (CGP), which includes design and performance standards for permanent stormwater management systems. These standards must be applied in all projects in which at least 1 acre of land is disturbed and 1 acre of new impervious area is being created, and the permit stipulates certain standards for various categories of stormwater management practices. | One of the goals of this Manual is to facilitate understanding of and compliance with the [https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Construction_stormwater_permit MPCA Construction General Permit] (CGP), which includes design and performance standards for permanent stormwater management systems. These standards must be applied in all projects in which at least 1 acre of land is disturbed and 1 acre of new impervious area is being created, and the permit stipulates certain standards for various categories of stormwater management practices. | ||
− | When volume control is constrained at a site and other BMP options (e.g. constructed pond, media filter) are not feasible, impermeable check dams can be incorporated into the design of swales to detain or retain water for extended periods thereby providing treatment for a portion or all of the water quality volume stored behind the check dams. For regulatory purposes, swales that incorporate check dams into their design fall under the “Infiltration | + | When volume control is constrained at a site and other BMP options (e.g. constructed pond, media filter) are not feasible, impermeable check dams can be incorporated into the design of swales to detain or retain water for extended periods thereby providing treatment for a portion or all of the water quality volume stored behind the check dams. For regulatory purposes, swales that incorporate check dams into their design fall under either the “Infiltration Systems" category described in Section 16 of the MPCA CGP or the "Filtration Systems" category described in Section 17 of the MPCA CGP. |
{{alert|Permeable check dams cannot be used to achieve the water quality volume needed for compliance with the MPCA CGP.|alert-warning}} | {{alert|Permeable check dams cannot be used to achieve the water quality volume needed for compliance with the MPCA CGP.|alert-warning}} | ||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
*Select a check dam type to meet longevity and other design objectives. | *Select a check dam type to meet longevity and other design objectives. | ||
*Complete final grading of the swale and rock/debris removal prior to check dam installation. | *Complete final grading of the swale and rock/debris removal prior to check dam installation. | ||
− | *Channel protection and stabilization (i.e., with turf reinforcement mats, Type 3 or 4 erosion control blankets, seed, etc.) should be achieved prior to installation of check dams. | + | *[https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=Erosion_prevention_practices Channel protection and stabilization] (i.e., with turf reinforcement mats, Type 3 or 4 erosion control blankets, seed, etc.) should be achieved prior to installation of check dams. |
*Install check dams immediately after swale stabilization (i.e., seeding and mulching or installation of rolled erosion control products). | *Install check dams immediately after swale stabilization (i.e., seeding and mulching or installation of rolled erosion control products). | ||
*Install check dams across entire width of swale, perpendicular to the flow. | *Install check dams across entire width of swale, perpendicular to the flow. | ||
Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
===Wood check dams=== | ===Wood check dams=== | ||
− | Wood check dams may use either pressure treated or natural wood. Wood check dams should be embedded at least 3 feet horizontally into side slopes. Pressure treated wood dams should follow | + | Wood check dams may use either pressure treated or natural wood. Wood check dams should be embedded at least 3 feet horizontally into side slopes. Pressure treated wood dams should follow AWPA Standard C6 specifications and are typically 6 inches by 6 inches or 8 inches by 8 inches in size. Creosote should not be used to coat pressure treated wood dams, as it contains pollutants that can leach out of the wood. |
Wood check dams constructed using natural materials are typically 6 inches to 12 inches in diameter and may be notched as necessary to keep flow concentrated in the center of the channel and to achieve the required drawdown time. Tree species that can withstand prolonged exposure to inundation (black locust, red mulberry, cedars, catalpa, white oak, chestnut oak, and black walnut) are preferred for use in natural wood check dams, while those with a tendency to rot should not be used (ash, beech, birch, elm, hackberry, hemlock, hickories, maples, red and black oak, pines, poplar, spruce, sweetgum, and willow). | Wood check dams constructed using natural materials are typically 6 inches to 12 inches in diameter and may be notched as necessary to keep flow concentrated in the center of the channel and to achieve the required drawdown time. Tree species that can withstand prolonged exposure to inundation (black locust, red mulberry, cedars, catalpa, white oak, chestnut oak, and black walnut) are preferred for use in natural wood check dams, while those with a tendency to rot should not be used (ash, beech, birch, elm, hackberry, hemlock, hickories, maples, red and black oak, pines, poplar, spruce, sweetgum, and willow). | ||
Line 96: | Line 96: | ||
==Design procedure – design steps== | ==Design procedure – design steps== | ||
===Compute water quality volume requirement for the project=== | ===Compute water quality volume requirement for the project=== | ||
− | To meet requirements of the [https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Construction_stormwater_permit Stormwater General Permit] (CSW permit), infiltration or filtration systems must provide a water quality volume (V<sub>wq</sub>) of one inch of runoff from new impervious surfaces created by the project. | + | To meet requirements of the [https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Construction_stormwater_permit Stormwater General Permit] (CSW permit), infiltration or filtration systems must provide a water quality volume (V<sub>wq</sub>) of one (1) inch of runoff from new impervious surfaces created by the project. |
:V<sub>wq</sub> = 1 inch × Area<sub>impervious surface</sub> | :V<sub>wq</sub> = 1 inch × Area<sub>impervious surface</sub> | ||
Line 105: | Line 105: | ||
[[File:Profile of swale with structural check dams.png|300px|thumb|alt=schematic of swale with check dams|<font size=3>Profile of swale with structural check dams (not to scale). Source: [http://www.virginiadot.org/business/locdes/bmp_designmanual.asp Virginia DOT BMP Design Manual], Chapter 6. Click on image to enlarge.</font size>]] | [[File:Profile of swale with structural check dams.png|300px|thumb|alt=schematic of swale with check dams|<font size=3>Profile of swale with structural check dams (not to scale). Source: [http://www.virginiadot.org/business/locdes/bmp_designmanual.asp Virginia DOT BMP Design Manual], Chapter 6. Click on image to enlarge.</font size>]] | ||
− | The number of check dams should be computed based on swale slope, length, and treatment objectives. For example, a swale designed to contain the entire | + | The number of check dams should be computed based on swale slope, length, and treatment objectives. For example, a swale designed to contain the entire V<sub>wq</sub> may require more check dams than a swale that only contains a portion of the V<sub>wq</sub>. |
Channel slopes between 0.5 and 2 percent are recommended unless topography necessitates a steeper slope, in which case 6- to 12-inch drop structures can be placed to limit the energy slope to within the recommended 0.5 to 2 percent range. Energy dissipation will be required below the drops. Spacing between the drops should not be closer than 50 feet. Depth of the V<sub>wq</sub> at the downstream end should not exceed 18 inches. | Channel slopes between 0.5 and 2 percent are recommended unless topography necessitates a steeper slope, in which case 6- to 12-inch drop structures can be placed to limit the energy slope to within the recommended 0.5 to 2 percent range. Energy dissipation will be required below the drops. Spacing between the drops should not be closer than 50 feet. Depth of the V<sub>wq</sub> at the downstream end should not exceed 18 inches. | ||
Line 119: | Line 119: | ||
When check dams are used to enable treatment of the entire V<sub>wq</sub> via filtration (e.g., dry swales with underdrain or biofiltration), the filtration bed should be designed to pass the V<sub>wq</sub> in 48 hours. Drawdown time for water ponded behind check dams used in tandem with a dry swale with underdrain system can be calculated based on the soil media infiltration rate and underdrain characteristics (diameter, material). | When check dams are used to enable treatment of the entire V<sub>wq</sub> via filtration (e.g., dry swales with underdrain or biofiltration), the filtration bed should be designed to pass the V<sub>wq</sub> in 48 hours. Drawdown time for water ponded behind check dams used in tandem with a dry swale with underdrain system can be calculated based on the soil media infiltration rate and underdrain characteristics (diameter, material). | ||
− | When check dams are used to increase V<sub>wq</sub> retention via infiltration (e.g., dry swales with no underdrain or bioinfiltration), the drawdown time (T<sub>drawdown</sub>) should be calculated as a function of the maximum depth between check dams and the design infiltration rate for the appropriate soil group using the equation below. | + | When check dams are used to increase V<sub>wq</sub> retention via infiltration (e.g., dry swales with no underdrain or bioinfiltration), the drawdown time (T<sub>drawdown</sub>) should be calculated as a function of the maximum depth between check dams and the [[Design infiltration rates|design infiltration rate]] for the appropriate soil group using the equation below. |
:T<sub>drawdown</sub> = (maxiumum depth behind check dam) / (soil infiltration rate) | :T<sub>drawdown</sub> = (maxiumum depth behind check dam) / (soil infiltration rate) | ||
===Calculate water quality volume achieved=== | ===Calculate water quality volume achieved=== | ||
− | The water quality volume (V<sub>wq</sub>) achieved behind each check dam (instantaneous volume) is given by | + | The water quality volume (V<sub>wq</sub>) (ft<sup>3</sup>) achieved behind each check dam (instantaneous volume) is given by |
− | <math> V_{wq} = h^2 * (h * H + B_w)]/(2S) </math> | + | <math> V_{wq} = [h^2 * ((h * H) + B_w)]/(2S) </math> |
where | where | ||
− | :h = check dam height ( | + | :h = check dam height (feet) |
− | :H = horizontal component of the swale side slope ( | + | :H = horizontal component of the swale side slope (vertical : horizontal)(dimensionless) |
:S = slope (unitless); and | :S = slope (unitless); and | ||
− | :Bw = channel bottom width ( | + | :Bw = channel bottom width (feet) |
Add the V<sub>wq</sub> for each check dam together to obtain the cumulative water quality volume for the swale. | Add the V<sub>wq</sub> for each check dam together to obtain the cumulative water quality volume for the swale. | ||
Line 145: | Line 145: | ||
Adjust the preliminary check dam dimensions to accommodate site specific concerns/impacts. Minimum design parameters for hydraulic and water quality criteria should be rechecked based on adjustments to the check dams to ensure that safe and adequate conveyance is still maintained. | Adjust the preliminary check dam dimensions to accommodate site specific concerns/impacts. Minimum design parameters for hydraulic and water quality criteria should be rechecked based on adjustments to the check dams to ensure that safe and adequate conveyance is still maintained. | ||
− | ===Sample calculations== | + | ===Sample calculation=== |
+ | [[File:Schematic for example swale calculations.png|500px|thumb|alt=schematic for swale calculation example|<font size=3>Schematic for example check dam and swale calculations.</font size>]] | ||
+ | |||
The following example illustrates use of the above design equations. Assuming 3 check dams are used to enhance water retention for a dry swale with no underdrain (bioinfiltration) constructed over a longitudinal slope of 2% on soils with an infiltration rate of 0.45 in/hr, with a bottom width of 5 ft, side slopes of 2H:1V, and check dam height of 1.5 ft, calculate: (1) the distance between check dams, (2) the drawdown time, and (3) the water quality volume achieved. | The following example illustrates use of the above design equations. Assuming 3 check dams are used to enhance water retention for a dry swale with no underdrain (bioinfiltration) constructed over a longitudinal slope of 2% on soils with an infiltration rate of 0.45 in/hr, with a bottom width of 5 ft, side slopes of 2H:1V, and check dam height of 1.5 ft, calculate: (1) the distance between check dams, (2) the drawdown time, and (3) the water quality volume achieved. | ||
Line 163: | Line 165: | ||
Inspections during construction are needed to ensure check dams are built in accordance with the approved design standards and specifications. Detailed inspection checklists should be used that include sign-offs by qualified individuals at critical stages of construction, to ensure that the contractor’s interpretation of the plan is acceptable to the professional designer. An example construction phase inspection checklist is provided below. | Inspections during construction are needed to ensure check dams are built in accordance with the approved design standards and specifications. Detailed inspection checklists should be used that include sign-offs by qualified individuals at critical stages of construction, to ensure that the contractor’s interpretation of the plan is acceptable to the professional designer. An example construction phase inspection checklist is provided below. | ||
− | + | {{:Check dam inspection checklist}} | |
==Standards and specifications== | ==Standards and specifications== | ||
Line 170: | Line 172: | ||
==Inspection== | ==Inspection== | ||
Specific inspection guidelines for check dams include the following. | Specific inspection guidelines for check dams include the following. | ||
− | *Regular inspections | + | *Regular inspections should be made to ensure that the center of the dam is lower than the edges. |
*Check the structural integrity of the check dams – shape, anchoring, and overall condition. | *Check the structural integrity of the check dams – shape, anchoring, and overall condition. | ||
*Look for scour underneath the check dam and bypasses on the sides. | *Look for scour underneath the check dam and bypasses on the sides. | ||
Line 185: | Line 187: | ||
*If the selected configuration is not preventing channel erosion, consider other materials or closer spacing in areas experiencing the most problems. | *If the selected configuration is not preventing channel erosion, consider other materials or closer spacing in areas experiencing the most problems. | ||
*If significant erosion occurs between dams, install a protective turf reinforcement mat or section of rip rap liner in that portion of the channel. | *If significant erosion occurs between dams, install a protective turf reinforcement mat or section of rip rap liner in that portion of the channel. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{:Check dam maintenance checklist}} | ||
==Reference materials== | ==Reference materials== | ||
− | *Clean Water Services Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Manual (4.2.1 Check Dam, 4.3.7 Pre-Fabricated Barrier System, 4.3.14 Wattles) | + | *[https://cleanwaterservices.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/erosion-prevention-and-sediment-control-manual.pdf Clean Water Services Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Manual] (4.2.1 Check Dam, 4.3.7 Pre-Fabricated Barrier System, 4.3.14 Wattles) |
− | *North Carolina Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual (6.63 Rock Dam) | + | *[https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-land-resources/energy-mineral-land-permit-guidance/erosion-sediment-control-planning-design-manual North Carolina Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual] (6.63 Rock Dam) |
− | *Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC) Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook (7.20 Check dam, 7.25 Tubes and wattles) | + | *[http://tnepsc.org/TDEC_EandS_Handbook_2012_Edition4/TDEC%20EandS%20Handbook%204th%20Edition.pdf Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC) Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook] (7.20 Check dam, 7.25 Tubes and wattles) |
− | *Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook (3.20 Rock Check Dams) | + | *[https://www.deq.virginia.gov/water/stormwater/stormwater-construction/handbooks Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook] (3.20 Rock Check Dams) |
+ | |||
+ | <noinclude> | ||
==Related pages== | ==Related pages== | ||
Line 199: | Line 205: | ||
*[[Construction stormwater photo gallery - Check dams (ditch checks, ditch dikes)]] | *[[Construction stormwater photo gallery - Check dams (ditch checks, ditch dikes)]] | ||
*[https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/images/b/be/MIDS_Dry_Swale_Sections-SHEET_2.pdf Dry swale sections] | *[https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/images/b/be/MIDS_Dry_Swale_Sections-SHEET_2.pdf Dry swale sections] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Level 3 - Best management practices/Structural practices/Wet swale]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Level 3 - Best management practices/Structural practices/Step pool]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Level 3 - Best management practices/Structural practices/Dry swale]] | ||
+ | </noinclude> |
A check dam is a structure installed perpendicular to flow in a natural or manmade conveyance channel to reduce flow velocity. By slowing flow velocities, check dams can serve multiple functions including reduction of channel scour and erosion, enhancement of sediment trapping, and greater treatment of the water quality control volume via enhanced water detention or retention. Typical check dam materials include rock, earth, wood, and concrete.
Incorporation of check dams into swale design allows treatment of a portion or all of the water quality volume (Vwq) within a series of cells created by the check dams. Check dams are relatively inexpensive and easy to install. They are not approved for use in regulated waterbodies (i.e., Waters of the State) without permit coverage from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. MPCA water quality certification requirements also apply.
While most flatter and shorter swales (i.e., slope less than 3 percent, length less than 200 feet) generally do not need check dams if they are stabilized immediately after construction (i.e., with sod, or seed and the appropriate rolled erosion control product), longer and steeper swales can benefit from check dam installations. When evaluating the use of check dams for a particular site, consider the following.
One of the goals of this Manual is to facilitate understanding of and compliance with the MPCA Construction General Permit (CGP), which includes design and performance standards for permanent stormwater management systems. These standards must be applied in all projects in which at least 1 acre of land is disturbed and 1 acre of new impervious area is being created, and the permit stipulates certain standards for various categories of stormwater management practices. When volume control is constrained at a site and other BMP options (e.g. constructed pond, media filter) are not feasible, impermeable check dams can be incorporated into the design of swales to detain or retain water for extended periods thereby providing treatment for a portion or all of the water quality volume stored behind the check dams. For regulatory purposes, swales that incorporate check dams into their design fall under either the “Infiltration Systems" category described in Section 16 of the MPCA CGP or the "Filtration Systems" category described in Section 17 of the MPCA CGP.
Check dams are rarely effective in steep channels (i.e., more than 10 percent slope) and are easily dislodged by high flow velocities if they are not designed, sized, and installed properly. Common causes of failure include
Planning guidelines and material selection for check dams are driven by site considerations (e.g., swale slope, length, flow velocities, soils) and the longevity desired. In general, swale slope should not exceed 10 percent (otherwise, a drop structure should be considered), the drainage area should not exceed 10 acres, and flow velocities should not exceed 12 feet per second for a 10-year, 24-hour storm frequency.
General installation guidelines for check dams include the following.
Rock or rip rap check dams should consist of well-graded stone consisting of a mixture of rock sizes. Since rock check dams are permeable, they are not suitable for situations where enhanced infiltration is desired and cannot be used to achieve the water quality volume when required for permit compliance.
Earth check dams are constructed with clayey soils with low permeability and therefore are considered impermeable. These check dams have greater potential to erode relative to check dams made from rock, wood, or concrete, and therefore care should be taken during and after construction to ensure the earth check dam is fully stabilized with grass cover before subjected to high storm flows and velocities. Erosion potential should be checked for the channel and earth check dam. Rock or aggregate can be placed on and/or downstream of the check dam to prevent erosion of the check dam material and channel material.
Wood check dams may use either pressure treated or natural wood. Wood check dams should be embedded at least 3 feet horizontally into side slopes. Pressure treated wood dams should follow AWPA Standard C6 specifications and are typically 6 inches by 6 inches or 8 inches by 8 inches in size. Creosote should not be used to coat pressure treated wood dams, as it contains pollutants that can leach out of the wood. Wood check dams constructed using natural materials are typically 6 inches to 12 inches in diameter and may be notched as necessary to keep flow concentrated in the center of the channel and to achieve the required drawdown time. Tree species that can withstand prolonged exposure to inundation (black locust, red mulberry, cedars, catalpa, white oak, chestnut oak, and black walnut) are preferred for use in natural wood check dams, while those with a tendency to rot should not be used (ash, beech, birch, elm, hackberry, hemlock, hickories, maples, red and black oak, pines, poplar, spruce, sweetgum, and willow).
Erosion potential should be checked for the channel and downstream of the check dam. Rock or aggregate can be placed upstream and downstream of the check dam to prevent erosion of the channel material.
Concrete check dams may be preferred when expected flow velocities could be high enough to compromise the structural integrity of the check dam if other materials were used. Rock check dams should be embedded at least 3 feet horizontally into side slopes. Concrete check dams should have a minimum thickness of 6 inches and a minimum height of 6 inches.
Precast check dams are required in order to minimize the potential for contamination of the surrounding soils.
Erosion potential should be checked for the channel and downstream of the check dam. Rock or aggregate can be placed upstream and downstream of the check dam to prevent scour and erosion of the channel material.
To meet requirements of the Stormwater General Permit (CSW permit), infiltration or filtration systems must provide a water quality volume (Vwq) of one (1) inch of runoff from new impervious surfaces created by the project.
If a portion of the Vwq is treated by another stormwater control measure(s), the volume to be treated by the swale with check dams should be computed using the above equation minus the Vwq portion treated by the other measure(s). If multiple check dams are used to create a series of cells, the volume of water within each cell should add up to the overall Vwq or the portion of the Vwq not treated by other stormwater control measure(s).
The number of check dams should be computed based on swale slope, length, and treatment objectives. For example, a swale designed to contain the entire Vwq may require more check dams than a swale that only contains a portion of the Vwq.
Channel slopes between 0.5 and 2 percent are recommended unless topography necessitates a steeper slope, in which case 6- to 12-inch drop structures can be placed to limit the energy slope to within the recommended 0.5 to 2 percent range. Energy dissipation will be required below the drops. Spacing between the drops should not be closer than 50 feet. Depth of the Vwq at the downstream end should not exceed 18 inches.
The spacing between check dams should be such that the bottom of the upstream check should be at the same elevation as the top of the downstream check. General check dam spacing can be calculated by dividing the height of the structure by the slope percentage (represented in decimal form).
When check dams are used to enable treatment of the entire Vwq via filtration (e.g., dry swales with underdrain or biofiltration), the filtration bed should be designed to pass the Vwq in 48 hours. Drawdown time for water ponded behind check dams used in tandem with a dry swale with underdrain system can be calculated based on the soil media infiltration rate and underdrain characteristics (diameter, material).
When check dams are used to increase Vwq retention via infiltration (e.g., dry swales with no underdrain or bioinfiltration), the drawdown time (Tdrawdown) should be calculated as a function of the maximum depth between check dams and the design infiltration rate for the appropriate soil group using the equation below.
The water quality volume (Vwq) (ft3) achieved behind each check dam (instantaneous volume) is given by
\( V_{wq} = [h^2 * ((h * H) + B_w)]/(2S) \)
where
Add the Vwq for each check dam together to obtain the cumulative water quality volume for the swale.
Check for erosive velocities and modify design as appropriate based on local conveyance regulations. Provide a minimum of 6 inches of freeboard.
Design control to meet the required 48 hour drawdown time. For wet swales, the water level should draw down to the flow line of the controlling check dam elevation within 48 hours.
Adjust the preliminary check dam dimensions to accommodate site specific concerns/impacts. Minimum design parameters for hydraulic and water quality criteria should be rechecked based on adjustments to the check dams to ensure that safe and adequate conveyance is still maintained.
The following example illustrates use of the above design equations. Assuming 3 check dams are used to enhance water retention for a dry swale with no underdrain (bioinfiltration) constructed over a longitudinal slope of 2% on soils with an infiltration rate of 0.45 in/hr, with a bottom width of 5 ft, side slopes of 2H:1V, and check dam height of 1.5 ft, calculate: (1) the distance between check dams, (2) the drawdown time, and (3) the water quality volume achieved.
Distance between check dams
Drawdown time
Water quality volume achieved
Inspections during construction are needed to ensure check dams are built in accordance with the approved design standards and specifications. Detailed inspection checklists should be used that include sign-offs by qualified individuals at critical stages of construction, to ensure that the contractor’s interpretation of the plan is acceptable to the professional designer. An example construction phase inspection checklist is provided below.
Check dam inspection checklist.
Link to this table
Project: | ||
---|---|---|
Location: | ||
Site Status: | ||
Date: | ||
Time: | ||
Inspector: | ||
Construction sequence | Satisfactory / Unsatisfactory | Comments |
Check dam material as per design specifications | ||
Check dam installation as per design specifications | ||
Dimensions per plan | ||
Spacing and grade per plan | ||
Final inspection | Satisfactory / Unsatisfactory | Comments |
Check dams operational | ||
Check dam structural integrity – shape, anchoring |
Check dam materials specifications.
Link to this table
Parameter | Specification | Size | Note |
---|---|---|---|
Check dam (pressure treated) | AWPA Standard C6 | 6” by 6” or 8” by 8” | do not coat with creosote; embed at least 3’ into side slopes |
Check Dam (natural wood) | Black Locust, Red Mulberry, Cedars, Catalpa, White Oak, Chestnut Oak, Black Walnut | 6” to 12” diameter; notch as necessary | do not use the following, as these species have a predisposition towards rot: Ash, Beech, Birch, Elm, Hackberry, Hemlock, Hickories, Maples, Red and Black Oak, Pines, Poplar, Spruce, Sweetgum, Willow |
Check dam (rock, rip rap) | per local criteria | Size per requirements based on 10-year design flow | Not suitable for infiltration |
Check dam (earth) | Per local criteria | Size per requirements based on 10-year design flow | Use clayey soils with low permeability |
Check dam (pre-cast concrete | per pre-cast manufacturer | Size per requirements based on 10-year design flow | Testing of pre-cast concrete required:
28 day strength and slump test; all concrete design (cast-in-place or pre-cast) not using previously approved State or local standards requires design drawings sealed and approved by a licensed professional structural engineer. |
Specific inspection guidelines for check dams include the following.
Specific maintenance guidelines for check dams include the following.
Check dam maintenance checklist.
Link to this table
Project: | ||
---|---|---|
Location: | ||
Site Status: | ||
Date: | ||
Time: | ||
Inspector: | ||
Maintenance item | Satisfactory / Unsatisfactory | Comments |
No evidence of flow going around structures | ||
No evidence of erosion at downstream toe | ||
No evidence of displaced rock or riprap | ||
No evidence of dead vegetation | ||
No evidence of deterioration of the check dam materials | ||
No blockage of the notch or low point |
This page was last edited on 11 January 2023, at 15:20.