m |
|||
(20 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | [[File:Technical information page image.png|right|100px|alt=image]] | ||
+ | [[File:Pdf image.png|100px|thumb|left|alt=pdf image|<font size=3>[https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=File:Shallow_groundwater_-_Minnesota_Stormwater_Manual.pdf Download pdf]</font size>]] | ||
[[file:Depth to water schematic.jpg|300 px|thumb|alt=schematic illustrating depth to water|<font size=3>Schematic illustrating how depth to water is calculated. Note that a temporary mound formed as a result of infiltration is not included in the determination of depth to water. (Source: CDM Smith)</font size>]] | [[file:Depth to water schematic.jpg|300 px|thumb|alt=schematic illustrating depth to water|<font size=3>Schematic illustrating how depth to water is calculated. Note that a temporary mound formed as a result of infiltration is not included in the determination of depth to water. (Source: CDM Smith)</font size>]] | ||
− | Shallow groundwater is a condition where the [[Glossary#S|seasonal high groundwater table]], or [[Glossary#S|saturated soil]], is less than 3 feet from the land surface. There is a large portion of the state (more than 50 percent) where the seasonal high water table is located less than 3 feet from the surface. In these areas it may be impossible to get the 3 feet of separation from the bottom of an infiltration practice to the seasonal high water table REQUIRED under the [ | + | Shallow groundwater is a condition where the [[Glossary#S|seasonal high groundwater table]], or [[Glossary#S|saturated soil]], is less than 3 feet from the land surface. There is a large portion of the state (more than 50 percent) where the seasonal high water table is located less than 3 feet from the surface. In these areas it may be impossible to get the 3 feet of separation from the bottom of an infiltration practice to the seasonal high water table REQUIRED under the [https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=Construction_stormwater_program Construction General Permit] (CGP). Non-infiltration BMPs, such as lined filtration or settling practices, should be considered in areas with shallow groundwater. |
==Why is shallow groundwater a concern?== | ==Why is shallow groundwater a concern?== | ||
Line 7: | Line 9: | ||
==How to investigate for shallow groundwater== | ==How to investigate for shallow groundwater== | ||
− | Investigations are recommended for all proposed stormwater facilities located on sites with a suspected shallow groundwater table. The investigation should be two-fold. First, appropriate screening tools such as [ | + | Investigations are recommended for all proposed stormwater facilities located on sites with a suspected shallow groundwater table. The investigation should be two-fold. First, appropriate screening tools such as [https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm soil surveys], [http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/waters/groundwater_section/mapping/index.html geologic atlases], or [https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/environment/water/mwi/index.html well records] should be used to determine the likelihood that the groundwater table is shallow. If a shallow groundwater table is present, a geotechnical investigation should be conducted. |
− | Geotechnical investigations are recommended for all proposed stormwater facilities located on sites where it is suspected that the 3 foot vertical separation between the base of the BMP and the groundwater table might not be achievable. This is needed to show that requirements of the CGP have been met. The guidelines for how to investigate for shallow groundwater are summarized below. Guidelines for investigating all potential physical constraints to infiltration on a site are presented in | + | Geotechnical investigations are recommended for all proposed stormwater facilities located on sites where it is suspected that the 3 foot vertical separation between the base of the BMP and the groundwater table might not be achievable. This is needed to show that requirements of the CGP have been met. The guidelines for how to investigate for shallow groundwater are summarized below. Guidelines for investigating all potential physical constraints to infiltration on a site are presented [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Procedures_for_investigating_sites_with_potential_constraints_on_stormwater_infiltration in a table at this link]. These guidelines should not be interpreted as all-inclusive. The size and complexity of the project will drive the extent of any subsurface investigation. Regardless of the results of the initial site screening, soils borings and infiltration tests should be performed to verify site soil conditions. |
===Subsurface material investigation=== | ===Subsurface material investigation=== | ||
Line 19: | Line 21: | ||
===Location of soil borings=== | ===Location of soil borings=== | ||
Borings should be located in order to provide representative area coverage of the proposed BMP facilities. The location of borings should be: | Borings should be located in order to provide representative area coverage of the proposed BMP facilities. The location of borings should be: | ||
− | *within each distinct major soil type present, as mapped in [ | + | *within each distinct major soil type present, as mapped in [https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm soil surveys]; |
*next to bedrock outcrop areas and/or in areas with known shallow groundwater if present; | *next to bedrock outcrop areas and/or in areas with known shallow groundwater if present; | ||
*near the edges and center of the proposed practice and spaced at equal distances from one another; and | *near the edges and center of the proposed practice and spaced at equal distances from one another; and | ||
Line 26: | Line 28: | ||
===Number of soil borings=== | ===Number of soil borings=== | ||
The number of recommended borings is described below. | The number of recommended borings is described below. | ||
− | *Infiltration trenches, bioretention, and filters - a minimum of 2 per practice. Note that more borings are recommended for infiltration BMPs greater than 5000 square feet in area. See here for recommendations on number of borings for infiltration BMPs as a function of BMP size. | + | *Infiltration trenches, bioretention, and filters - a minimum of 2 per practice. Note that more borings are recommended for infiltration BMPs greater than 5000 square feet in area. See [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Recommended_number_of_soil_boring,_pits,_and_permeameter_tests_for_bioretention_design here] for recommendations on number of borings for infiltration BMPs as a function of BMP size. |
*Ponds/wetlands - a minimum of 3 per practice, or 3 per acre, whichever is greater. | *Ponds/wetlands - a minimum of 3 per practice, or 3 per acre, whichever is greater. | ||
*Additional borings – as needed to define lateral extent of limiting horizons, or site specific conditions, where applicable. | *Additional borings – as needed to define lateral extent of limiting horizons, or site specific conditions, where applicable. | ||
Line 34: | Line 36: | ||
===Identification of material=== | ===Identification of material=== | ||
− | All material penetrated by the boring should be identified, as follows | + | All material penetrated by the boring should be identified, as follows. |
*Provide descriptions, logging, and sampling for the entire depth of the boring. | *Provide descriptions, logging, and sampling for the entire depth of the boring. | ||
*Note any stains, odors, or other indications of environmental degradation. | *Note any stains, odors, or other indications of environmental degradation. | ||
*Perform a laboratory analysis of a minimum of 2 soil samples, representative of the material penetrated including potential limiting horizons, with the results compared to the field descriptions. | *Perform a laboratory analysis of a minimum of 2 soil samples, representative of the material penetrated including potential limiting horizons, with the results compared to the field descriptions. | ||
− | *Identify soil | + | *Identify soil characteristics including, at a minimum: color; mineral composition; grain size, shape, and sorting; and saturation. |
*Log any indications of water saturation to include both perched and ground water table levels, and descriptions of soils that are mottled or gleyed (sticky clay soils typically found in waterlogged soils). | *Log any indications of water saturation to include both perched and ground water table levels, and descriptions of soils that are mottled or gleyed (sticky clay soils typically found in waterlogged soils). | ||
*Measure water levels in all borings at the time of completion and again 24 hours after completion. The boring should remain fully open to total depth of these measurements. | *Measure water levels in all borings at the time of completion and again 24 hours after completion. The boring should remain fully open to total depth of these measurements. | ||
− | *Estimate soil engineering characteristics, including “N” or estimated unconfined compressive strength, when conducting a standard penetration test (SPT). | + | *Estimate soil engineering characteristics, including “N” or estimated [https://www.iricen.gov.in/LAB/res/html/Test-37.html#:~:text=Unconfined%20Compressive%20Strength%20(UCS)%20stands,shear%20strength%20of%20clayey%20soil. unconfined compressive strength], when conducting a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_penetration_test standard penetration test] (SPT). |
===Evaluation of findings=== | ===Evaluation of findings=== | ||
− | At least 1 figure showing the subsurface soil profile cross section through the proposed practice should be provided, showing confining layers, depth to bedrock, and water table (if encountered). It should extend through a central portion of the proposed practice, using the actual or projected boring data. A sketch map or formal construction plan indicating the location and dimension of the proposed practice and line of cross section should be included for reference, or as a base map for presentation of subsurface data. | + | At least one (1) figure showing the subsurface soil profile cross section through the proposed practice should be provided, showing confining layers, depth to bedrock, and water table (if encountered). It should extend through a central portion of the proposed practice, using the actual or projected boring data. A sketch map or formal construction plan indicating the location and dimension of the proposed practice and line of cross section should be included for reference, or as a base map for presentation of subsurface data. |
+ | |||
+ | ===References for conducting geotechnical investigations=== | ||
+ | {{alert|A section providing information on soil borings is being developed for the Manual and should be available in early 2016|alert-info}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | The following references provide useful information for conducting geotechnical investigations. Note that some of these documents were written for investigations at contaminated sites. | ||
+ | *[https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/reviewguide/checklist.pdf CHECKLIST AND GUIDELINES FOR REVIEW OF GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS AND PRELIMINARY PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS] | ||
+ | *[https://www.publications.usace.army.mil/portals/76/publications/engineermanuals/em_1110-1-1804.pdf Geotechnical Investigations] | ||
+ | *[https://dtsc.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/2018/09/Guidelines_for_Planning_and_Implementing_GW_Characterization_of-Contam_Sites.pdf GUIDELINES FOR PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTING GROUNDWATER CHARACTERIZATION OF CONTAMINATED SITES] | ||
+ | *[https://seawi.org/images/downloads/2017_Spring_Conference_Presentations/walters_how_to_read_a_geotech_rpt.pdf How to Read and Understand a Geotechnical Report] | ||
==What are general stormwater management guidelines for areas with shallow groundwater?== | ==What are general stormwater management guidelines for areas with shallow groundwater?== | ||
The following investigations and design variants are HIGHLY RECOMMENDED for infiltration BMPs proposed to be located in areas of shallow groundwater: | The following investigations and design variants are HIGHLY RECOMMENDED for infiltration BMPs proposed to be located in areas of shallow groundwater: | ||
− | *Conduct thorough geotechnical investigations with geotechnical analyses similar to those recommended for Karst regions. | + | *Conduct thorough geotechnical investigations with geotechnical analyses similar to those recommended for [[Karst|karst]] regions. |
*Conclude the site to be infeasible for infiltration BMPs where a minimum 3 foot separation between the bottom of the BMP and groundwater cannot be achieved. The CGP prohibits infiltration BMPs when the separation distance is less than 3 feet. | *Conclude the site to be infeasible for infiltration BMPs where a minimum 3 foot separation between the bottom of the BMP and groundwater cannot be achieved. The CGP prohibits infiltration BMPs when the separation distance is less than 3 feet. | ||
− | *Consider stormwater wetlands which require a shallower ponding depth than stormwater ponds. The disadvantage of stormwater wetlands is that the shallow depth of the wetlands often creates footprints that are larger than ponds. | + | *Consider [[Stormwater wetlands|stormwater wetlands]] which require a shallower ponding depth than [[Stormwater ponds|stormwater ponds]]. The disadvantage of stormwater wetlands is that the shallow depth of the wetlands often creates footprints that are larger than ponds. |
− | *Consider a stormwater pond that will intercept the groundwater table. This approach requires close examination of the land uses to assess the potential for stormwater hotspot or other highly concentrated runoff sources that would contribute excess pollutants to the groundwater. If a stormwater hotspot is | + | *Consider a stormwater pond that will intercept the groundwater table. This approach requires close examination of the land uses to assess the potential for [[Potential stormwater hotspots|stormwater hotspot]] or other highly concentrated runoff sources that would contribute excess pollutants to the groundwater. If the area is a potential stormwater hotspot and there is less than 3 feet of separation from the seaonally high water table, or if the area is a confirmed stormwater hotspot, a [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Liners_for_stormwater_management#Liner_specifications Level 1 liner] is recommended to protect against groundwater contamination. |
MPCA is often asked why it allows a sedimentation pond (no liner) to be constructed that may intercept the water table, but require a minimum of 3 feet of separation from the bottom of any constructed infiltration practice and the water table. The treatment processes for these two practices are very different and may help to explain the requirements. A stormwater pond achieves pollutant removal through the process of settling of suspended solids. If the basin is large enough, contains vegetation, and has a long detention time, additional treatment through biological uptake and microbial action can also occur. An infiltration practice removes pollutants through filtering that occurs in the minimum 3 foot unsaturated soil layer beneath the practice along with the biologic and microbial activity that takes place in the layer under aerobic conditions. | MPCA is often asked why it allows a sedimentation pond (no liner) to be constructed that may intercept the water table, but require a minimum of 3 feet of separation from the bottom of any constructed infiltration practice and the water table. The treatment processes for these two practices are very different and may help to explain the requirements. A stormwater pond achieves pollutant removal through the process of settling of suspended solids. If the basin is large enough, contains vegetation, and has a long detention time, additional treatment through biological uptake and microbial action can also occur. An infiltration practice removes pollutants through filtering that occurs in the minimum 3 foot unsaturated soil layer beneath the practice along with the biologic and microbial activity that takes place in the layer under aerobic conditions. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
==Related pages== | ==Related pages== | ||
− | *[[Overview of stormwater infiltration | + | *[[Overview of stormwater infiltration]] |
*[[Pre-treatment considerations for stormwater infiltration]] | *[[Pre-treatment considerations for stormwater infiltration]] | ||
− | *[[BMPs for stormwater infiltration | + | *[[BMPs for stormwater infiltration]] |
*[[Pollutant fate and transport in stormwater infiltration systems]] | *[[Pollutant fate and transport in stormwater infiltration systems]] | ||
*[[Surface water and groundwater quality impacts from stormwater infiltration]] | *[[Surface water and groundwater quality impacts from stormwater infiltration]] | ||
− | *[[Stormwater infiltration and groundwater | + | *[[Stormwater infiltration and groundwater mounding]] |
− | *[[Stormwater infiltration and setback (separation) | + | *[[Stormwater infiltration and setback (separation) distances]] |
*[[Karst]] | *[[Karst]] | ||
*[[Shallow soils and shallow depth to bedrock]] | *[[Shallow soils and shallow depth to bedrock]] | ||
+ | *[[Shallow groundwater]] | ||
*[[Soils with low infiltration capacity]] | *[[Soils with low infiltration capacity]] | ||
*[[Potential stormwater hotspots]] | *[[Potential stormwater hotspots]] | ||
− | *[[Stormwater and wellhead | + | *[[Stormwater and wellhead protection]] |
− | *[[Stormwater | + | *[[Stormwater infiltration and contaminated soils and groundwater]] |
− | *[[Decision tools for stormwater infiltration | + | *[[Decision tools for stormwater infiltration]] |
− | *[[Stormwater infiltration research | + | *[[Stormwater infiltration research needs]] |
*[[References for stormwater infiltration]] | *[[References for stormwater infiltration]] | ||
<noinclude> | <noinclude> | ||
− | [[Category: | + | [[Category:Level 2 - Technical and specific topic information/infiltration]] |
</noinclude> | </noinclude> |
Shallow groundwater is a condition where the seasonal high groundwater table, or saturated soil, is less than 3 feet from the land surface. There is a large portion of the state (more than 50 percent) where the seasonal high water table is located less than 3 feet from the surface. In these areas it may be impossible to get the 3 feet of separation from the bottom of an infiltration practice to the seasonal high water table REQUIRED under the Construction General Permit (CGP). Non-infiltration BMPs, such as lined filtration or settling practices, should be considered in areas with shallow groundwater.
Removal of some pollutants (e.g., bacteria) can occur in the vadose zone beneath the base of the BMP. Pollutant removal in the vadose zone is attained via biological activity, chemical degradation, adsorption of pollutants to soil, and plant uptake. Shallow groundwater reduces the depth of the unsaturated soil available for treatment, leading to an increased likelihood of groundwater contamination. The vadose zone is further reduced when a groundwater mound forms. These sites present challenges to stormwater management, however these challenges can be managed. General guidelines for investigation and management are presented in the following sections.
Investigations are recommended for all proposed stormwater facilities located on sites with a suspected shallow groundwater table. The investigation should be two-fold. First, appropriate screening tools such as soil surveys, geologic atlases, or well records should be used to determine the likelihood that the groundwater table is shallow. If a shallow groundwater table is present, a geotechnical investigation should be conducted.
Geotechnical investigations are recommended for all proposed stormwater facilities located on sites where it is suspected that the 3 foot vertical separation between the base of the BMP and the groundwater table might not be achievable. This is needed to show that requirements of the CGP have been met. The guidelines for how to investigate for shallow groundwater are summarized below. Guidelines for investigating all potential physical constraints to infiltration on a site are presented in a table at this link. These guidelines should not be interpreted as all-inclusive. The size and complexity of the project will drive the extent of any subsurface investigation. Regardless of the results of the initial site screening, soils borings and infiltration tests should be performed to verify site soil conditions.
The investigation is designed to determine the nature and thickness of subsurface materials, including depth to bedrock and to the water table. Subsurface data for depth to groundwater may be acquired by soil boring or studying existing wells on the site, if present. These field data should be supplemented by geophysical investigation techniques deemed appropriate by a qualified professional, which will show the location of the groundwater formations under the surface. The data listed below should be acquired under the direct supervision of a qualified geologist, geotechnical engineer, or soil scientist who is experienced in conducting such studies. Pertinent site information should include the following:
Borings should be located in order to provide representative area coverage of the proposed BMP facilities. The location of borings should be:
The number of recommended borings is described below.
Borings should be extended to a minimum depth of 5 feet below the lowest proposed grade within the practice unless auger/backhoe refusal is encountered.
All material penetrated by the boring should be identified, as follows.
At least one (1) figure showing the subsurface soil profile cross section through the proposed practice should be provided, showing confining layers, depth to bedrock, and water table (if encountered). It should extend through a central portion of the proposed practice, using the actual or projected boring data. A sketch map or formal construction plan indicating the location and dimension of the proposed practice and line of cross section should be included for reference, or as a base map for presentation of subsurface data.
The following references provide useful information for conducting geotechnical investigations. Note that some of these documents were written for investigations at contaminated sites.
The following investigations and design variants are HIGHLY RECOMMENDED for infiltration BMPs proposed to be located in areas of shallow groundwater:
MPCA is often asked why it allows a sedimentation pond (no liner) to be constructed that may intercept the water table, but require a minimum of 3 feet of separation from the bottom of any constructed infiltration practice and the water table. The treatment processes for these two practices are very different and may help to explain the requirements. A stormwater pond achieves pollutant removal through the process of settling of suspended solids. If the basin is large enough, contains vegetation, and has a long detention time, additional treatment through biological uptake and microbial action can also occur. An infiltration practice removes pollutants through filtering that occurs in the minimum 3 foot unsaturated soil layer beneath the practice along with the biologic and microbial activity that takes place in the layer under aerobic conditions.
This page was last edited on 15 February 2023, at 13:13.