m |
|||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Concrete check dams.jpg|300px|thumb|alt=photo concrete check dams|<font size=3>Impermeable concrete check dams. Photo courtesy Limnotech.</font size>]] | [[File:Concrete check dams.jpg|300px|thumb|alt=photo concrete check dams|<font size=3>Impermeable concrete check dams. Photo courtesy Limnotech.</font size>]] | ||
− | {{alert|Swales can be an important tool for retention and detention of stormwater runoff. Depending on design and construction, swales may provide additional benefits, including cleaner air, carbon sequestration, improved biological habitat, and aesthetic value. See the section [[Green Infrastructure | + | {{alert|Swales can be an important tool for retention and detention of stormwater runoff. Depending on design and construction, swales may provide additional benefits, including cleaner air, carbon sequestration, improved biological habitat, and aesthetic value. See the section [[Green Stormwater Infrastructure (GSI) and sustainable stormwater management]].|alert-success}} |
A check dam is a structure installed perpendicular to flow in a natural or manmade conveyance channel to reduce flow velocity. By slowing flow velocities, check dams can serve multiple functions including reduction of channel scour and erosion, enhancement of sediment trapping, and greater treatment of the water quality control volume via enhanced water detention or retention. Typical check dam materials include rock, earth, wood, and concrete. | A check dam is a structure installed perpendicular to flow in a natural or manmade conveyance channel to reduce flow velocity. By slowing flow velocities, check dams can serve multiple functions including reduction of channel scour and erosion, enhancement of sediment trapping, and greater treatment of the water quality control volume via enhanced water detention or retention. Typical check dam materials include rock, earth, wood, and concrete. | ||
Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
===Wood check dams=== | ===Wood check dams=== | ||
− | Wood check dams may use either pressure treated or natural wood. Wood check dams should be embedded at least 3 feet horizontally into side slopes. Pressure treated wood dams should follow | + | Wood check dams may use either pressure treated or natural wood. Wood check dams should be embedded at least 3 feet horizontally into side slopes. Pressure treated wood dams should follow AWPA Standard C6 specifications and are typically 6 inches by 6 inches or 8 inches by 8 inches in size. Creosote should not be used to coat pressure treated wood dams, as it contains pollutants that can leach out of the wood. |
Wood check dams constructed using natural materials are typically 6 inches to 12 inches in diameter and may be notched as necessary to keep flow concentrated in the center of the channel and to achieve the required drawdown time. Tree species that can withstand prolonged exposure to inundation (black locust, red mulberry, cedars, catalpa, white oak, chestnut oak, and black walnut) are preferred for use in natural wood check dams, while those with a tendency to rot should not be used (ash, beech, birch, elm, hackberry, hemlock, hickories, maples, red and black oak, pines, poplar, spruce, sweetgum, and willow). | Wood check dams constructed using natural materials are typically 6 inches to 12 inches in diameter and may be notched as necessary to keep flow concentrated in the center of the channel and to achieve the required drawdown time. Tree species that can withstand prolonged exposure to inundation (black locust, red mulberry, cedars, catalpa, white oak, chestnut oak, and black walnut) are preferred for use in natural wood check dams, while those with a tendency to rot should not be used (ash, beech, birch, elm, hackberry, hemlock, hickories, maples, red and black oak, pines, poplar, spruce, sweetgum, and willow). | ||
Line 191: | Line 191: | ||
==Reference materials== | ==Reference materials== | ||
− | *[https:// | + | *[https://cleanwaterservices.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/erosion-prevention-and-sediment-control-manual.pdf Clean Water Services Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Manual] (4.2.1 Check Dam, 4.3.7 Pre-Fabricated Barrier System, 4.3.14 Wattles) |
*[https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-land-resources/energy-mineral-land-permit-guidance/erosion-sediment-control-planning-design-manual North Carolina Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual] (6.63 Rock Dam) | *[https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-land-resources/energy-mineral-land-permit-guidance/erosion-sediment-control-planning-design-manual North Carolina Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual] (6.63 Rock Dam) | ||
*[http://tnepsc.org/TDEC_EandS_Handbook_2012_Edition4/TDEC%20EandS%20Handbook%204th%20Edition.pdf Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC) Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook] (7.20 Check dam, 7.25 Tubes and wattles) | *[http://tnepsc.org/TDEC_EandS_Handbook_2012_Edition4/TDEC%20EandS%20Handbook%204th%20Edition.pdf Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC) Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook] (7.20 Check dam, 7.25 Tubes and wattles) | ||
− | *[ | + | *[https://www.deq.virginia.gov/water/stormwater/stormwater-construction/handbooks Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook] (3.20 Rock Check Dams) |
<noinclude> | <noinclude> | ||
+ | |||
==Related pages== | ==Related pages== | ||
*[[Dry swale (Grass swale)]] ([[Dry swale (grass swale) combined|+]]) | *[[Dry swale (Grass swale)]] ([[Dry swale (grass swale) combined|+]]) | ||
Line 205: | Line 206: | ||
*[https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/images/b/be/MIDS_Dry_Swale_Sections-SHEET_2.pdf Dry swale sections] | *[https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/images/b/be/MIDS_Dry_Swale_Sections-SHEET_2.pdf Dry swale sections] | ||
− | [[ | + | [[Category:Level 3 - Best management practices/Structural practices/Wet swale]] |
+ | [[Category:Level 3 - Best management practices/Structural practices/Step pool]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Level 3 - Best management practices/Structural practices/Dry swale]] | ||
</noinclude> | </noinclude> |
A check dam is a structure installed perpendicular to flow in a natural or manmade conveyance channel to reduce flow velocity. By slowing flow velocities, check dams can serve multiple functions including reduction of channel scour and erosion, enhancement of sediment trapping, and greater treatment of the water quality control volume via enhanced water detention or retention. Typical check dam materials include rock, earth, wood, and concrete.
Incorporation of check dams into swale design allows treatment of a portion or all of the water quality volume (Vwq) within a series of cells created by the check dams. Check dams are relatively inexpensive and easy to install. They are not approved for use in regulated waterbodies (i.e., Waters of the State) without permit coverage from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. MPCA water quality certification requirements also apply.
While most flatter and shorter swales (i.e., slope less than 3 percent, length less than 200 feet) generally do not need check dams if they are stabilized immediately after construction (i.e., with sod, or seed and the appropriate rolled erosion control product), longer and steeper swales can benefit from check dam installations. When evaluating the use of check dams for a particular site, consider the following.
One of the goals of this Manual is to facilitate understanding of and compliance with the MPCA Construction General Permit (CGP), which includes design and performance standards for permanent stormwater management systems. These standards must be applied in all projects in which at least 1 acre of land is disturbed and 1 acre of new impervious area is being created, and the permit stipulates certain standards for various categories of stormwater management practices. When volume control is constrained at a site and other BMP options (e.g. constructed pond, media filter) are not feasible, impermeable check dams can be incorporated into the design of swales to detain or retain water for extended periods thereby providing treatment for a portion or all of the water quality volume stored behind the check dams. For regulatory purposes, swales that incorporate check dams into their design fall under either the “Infiltration Systems" category described in Section 16 of the MPCA CGP or the "Filtration Systems" category described in Section 17 of the MPCA CGP.
Check dams are rarely effective in steep channels (i.e., more than 10 percent slope) and are easily dislodged by high flow velocities if they are not designed, sized, and installed properly. Common causes of failure include
Planning guidelines and material selection for check dams are driven by site considerations (e.g., swale slope, length, flow velocities, soils) and the longevity desired. In general, swale slope should not exceed 10 percent (otherwise, a drop structure should be considered), the drainage area should not exceed 10 acres, and flow velocities should not exceed 12 feet per second for a 10-year, 24-hour storm frequency.
General installation guidelines for check dams include the following.
Rock or rip rap check dams should consist of well-graded stone consisting of a mixture of rock sizes. Since rock check dams are permeable, they are not suitable for situations where enhanced infiltration is desired and cannot be used to achieve the water quality volume when required for permit compliance.
Earth check dams are constructed with clayey soils with low permeability and therefore are considered impermeable. These check dams have greater potential to erode relative to check dams made from rock, wood, or concrete, and therefore care should be taken during and after construction to ensure the earth check dam is fully stabilized with grass cover before subjected to high storm flows and velocities. Erosion potential should be checked for the channel and earth check dam. Rock or aggregate can be placed on and/or downstream of the check dam to prevent erosion of the check dam material and channel material.
Wood check dams may use either pressure treated or natural wood. Wood check dams should be embedded at least 3 feet horizontally into side slopes. Pressure treated wood dams should follow AWPA Standard C6 specifications and are typically 6 inches by 6 inches or 8 inches by 8 inches in size. Creosote should not be used to coat pressure treated wood dams, as it contains pollutants that can leach out of the wood. Wood check dams constructed using natural materials are typically 6 inches to 12 inches in diameter and may be notched as necessary to keep flow concentrated in the center of the channel and to achieve the required drawdown time. Tree species that can withstand prolonged exposure to inundation (black locust, red mulberry, cedars, catalpa, white oak, chestnut oak, and black walnut) are preferred for use in natural wood check dams, while those with a tendency to rot should not be used (ash, beech, birch, elm, hackberry, hemlock, hickories, maples, red and black oak, pines, poplar, spruce, sweetgum, and willow).
Erosion potential should be checked for the channel and downstream of the check dam. Rock or aggregate can be placed upstream and downstream of the check dam to prevent erosion of the channel material.
Concrete check dams may be preferred when expected flow velocities could be high enough to compromise the structural integrity of the check dam if other materials were used. Rock check dams should be embedded at least 3 feet horizontally into side slopes. Concrete check dams should have a minimum thickness of 6 inches and a minimum height of 6 inches.
Precast check dams are required in order to minimize the potential for contamination of the surrounding soils.
Erosion potential should be checked for the channel and downstream of the check dam. Rock or aggregate can be placed upstream and downstream of the check dam to prevent scour and erosion of the channel material.
To meet requirements of the Stormwater General Permit (CSW permit), infiltration or filtration systems must provide a water quality volume (Vwq) of one (1) inch of runoff from new impervious surfaces created by the project.
If a portion of the Vwq is treated by another stormwater control measure(s), the volume to be treated by the swale with check dams should be computed using the above equation minus the Vwq portion treated by the other measure(s). If multiple check dams are used to create a series of cells, the volume of water within each cell should add up to the overall Vwq or the portion of the Vwq not treated by other stormwater control measure(s).
The number of check dams should be computed based on swale slope, length, and treatment objectives. For example, a swale designed to contain the entire Vwq may require more check dams than a swale that only contains a portion of the Vwq.
Channel slopes between 0.5 and 2 percent are recommended unless topography necessitates a steeper slope, in which case 6- to 12-inch drop structures can be placed to limit the energy slope to within the recommended 0.5 to 2 percent range. Energy dissipation will be required below the drops. Spacing between the drops should not be closer than 50 feet. Depth of the Vwq at the downstream end should not exceed 18 inches.
The spacing between check dams should be such that the bottom of the upstream check should be at the same elevation as the top of the downstream check. General check dam spacing can be calculated by dividing the height of the structure by the slope percentage (represented in decimal form).
When check dams are used to enable treatment of the entire Vwq via filtration (e.g., dry swales with underdrain or biofiltration), the filtration bed should be designed to pass the Vwq in 48 hours. Drawdown time for water ponded behind check dams used in tandem with a dry swale with underdrain system can be calculated based on the soil media infiltration rate and underdrain characteristics (diameter, material).
When check dams are used to increase Vwq retention via infiltration (e.g., dry swales with no underdrain or bioinfiltration), the drawdown time (Tdrawdown) should be calculated as a function of the maximum depth between check dams and the design infiltration rate for the appropriate soil group using the equation below.
The water quality volume (Vwq) (ft3) achieved behind each check dam (instantaneous volume) is given by
\( V_{wq} = [h^2 * ((h * H) + B_w)]/(2S) \)
where
Add the Vwq for each check dam together to obtain the cumulative water quality volume for the swale.
Check for erosive velocities and modify design as appropriate based on local conveyance regulations. Provide a minimum of 6 inches of freeboard.
Design control to meet the required 48 hour drawdown time. For wet swales, the water level should draw down to the flow line of the controlling check dam elevation within 48 hours.
Adjust the preliminary check dam dimensions to accommodate site specific concerns/impacts. Minimum design parameters for hydraulic and water quality criteria should be rechecked based on adjustments to the check dams to ensure that safe and adequate conveyance is still maintained.
The following example illustrates use of the above design equations. Assuming 3 check dams are used to enhance water retention for a dry swale with no underdrain (bioinfiltration) constructed over a longitudinal slope of 2% on soils with an infiltration rate of 0.45 in/hr, with a bottom width of 5 ft, side slopes of 2H:1V, and check dam height of 1.5 ft, calculate: (1) the distance between check dams, (2) the drawdown time, and (3) the water quality volume achieved.
Distance between check dams
Drawdown time
Water quality volume achieved
Inspections during construction are needed to ensure check dams are built in accordance with the approved design standards and specifications. Detailed inspection checklists should be used that include sign-offs by qualified individuals at critical stages of construction, to ensure that the contractor’s interpretation of the plan is acceptable to the professional designer. An example construction phase inspection checklist is provided below.
Check dam inspection checklist.
Link to this table
Project: | ||
---|---|---|
Location: | ||
Site Status: | ||
Date: | ||
Time: | ||
Inspector: | ||
Construction sequence | Satisfactory / Unsatisfactory | Comments |
Check dam material as per design specifications | ||
Check dam installation as per design specifications | ||
Dimensions per plan | ||
Spacing and grade per plan | ||
Final inspection | Satisfactory / Unsatisfactory | Comments |
Check dams operational | ||
Check dam structural integrity – shape, anchoring |
Check dam materials specifications.
Link to this table
Parameter | Specification | Size | Note |
---|---|---|---|
Check dam (pressure treated) | AWPA Standard C6 | 6” by 6” or 8” by 8” | do not coat with creosote; embed at least 3’ into side slopes |
Check Dam (natural wood) | Black Locust, Red Mulberry, Cedars, Catalpa, White Oak, Chestnut Oak, Black Walnut | 6” to 12” diameter; notch as necessary | do not use the following, as these species have a predisposition towards rot: Ash, Beech, Birch, Elm, Hackberry, Hemlock, Hickories, Maples, Red and Black Oak, Pines, Poplar, Spruce, Sweetgum, Willow |
Check dam (rock, rip rap) | per local criteria | Size per requirements based on 10-year design flow | Not suitable for infiltration |
Check dam (earth) | Per local criteria | Size per requirements based on 10-year design flow | Use clayey soils with low permeability |
Check dam (pre-cast concrete | per pre-cast manufacturer | Size per requirements based on 10-year design flow | Testing of pre-cast concrete required:
28 day strength and slump test; all concrete design (cast-in-place or pre-cast) not using previously approved State or local standards requires design drawings sealed and approved by a licensed professional structural engineer. |
Specific inspection guidelines for check dams include the following.
Specific maintenance guidelines for check dams include the following.
Check dam maintenance checklist.
Link to this table
Project: | ||
---|---|---|
Location: | ||
Site Status: | ||
Date: | ||
Time: | ||
Inspector: | ||
Maintenance item | Satisfactory / Unsatisfactory | Comments |
No evidence of flow going around structures | ||
No evidence of erosion at downstream toe | ||
No evidence of displaced rock or riprap | ||
No evidence of dead vegetation | ||
No evidence of deterioration of the check dam materials | ||
No blockage of the notch or low point |
This page was last edited on 11 January 2023, at 15:20.