m |
m |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| Energy savings || <font size=4><center>◔</center></font size> || | | Energy savings || <font size=4><center>◔</center></font size> || | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | Climate resiliency || | + | | Climate resiliency || <center>◯</center> || Provides some rate control. Impacts on carbon sequestration are uncertain. |
|- | |- | ||
| Air quality || <center>◯</center></font size> || | | Air quality || <center>◯</center></font size> || | ||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| Community livability || <font size=4><center>◔</center> || Aesthetically pleasing and can be incorporated into a wide range of land use settings. | | Community livability || <font size=4><center>◔</center> || Aesthetically pleasing and can be incorporated into a wide range of land use settings. | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | Health benefits || | + | | Health benefits || <center>◯</center></font size> || |
|- | |- | ||
| Economic savings || <font size=4><center>◔</center> || Generally provide cost savings vs. conventional practices over the life of the practice. | | Economic savings || <font size=4><center>◔</center> || Generally provide cost savings vs. conventional practices over the life of the practice. |
Swales
Benefit | Effectiveness | Notes |
---|---|---|
Water quality | Benefits are maximized for bioinfiltration. Biofiltration may export phosphorus if not designed properly. | |
Water quantity/supply | Bioinfiltration helps mimic natural hydrology. Some rate control benefit. | |
Energy savings | ||
Climate resiliency | Provides some rate control. Impacts on carbon sequestration are uncertain. | |
Air quality | ||
Habitat improvement | Use of perennial vegetation and certain media mixes promote invertebrate communities. | |
Community livability | Aesthetically pleasing and can be incorporated into a wide range of land use settings. | |
Health benefits | ||
Economic savings | Generally provide cost savings vs. conventional practices over the life of the practice. | |
Macroscale benefits | Individual bioretention practices are typically microscale, but multiple bioretention practices, when incorporated into a landscape design, provide macroscale benefits such as wildlife corridors. | |
Level of benefit: ◯ - none; ◔; - small; ◑ - moderate; ◕ - large; ● - very high |
Permeable pavement
Benefit | Effectiveness | Notes |
---|---|---|
Water quality | Benefits are maximized for bioinfiltration. Biofiltration may export phosphorus if not designed properly. | |
Water quantity/supply | Bioinfiltration helps mimic natural hydrology. Some rate control benefit. | |
Energy savings | ||
Climate resiliency | Provides some rate control. Impacts on carbon sequestration are uncertain. | |
Air quality | ||
Habitat improvement | Use of perennial vegetation and certain media mixes promote invertebrate communities. | |
Community livability | Aesthetically pleasing and can be incorporated into a wide range of land use settings. | |
Health benefits | ||
Economic savings | Generally provide cost savings vs. conventional practices over the life of the practice. | |
Macroscale benefits | Individual bioretention practices are typically microscale, but multiple bioretention practices, when incorporated into a landscape design, provide macroscale benefits such as wildlife corridors. | |
Level of benefit: ◯ - none; ◔; - small; ◑ - moderate; ◕ - large; ● - very high |