Warning: This page is an edit and testing page use by the wiki authors. It is not a content page for the Manual. Information on this page may not be accurate and should not be used as guidance in managing stormwater.

This page provides recommendations for managing and storing snow collected from impervious surfaces. The recommendations focus on protection of surface waters (lakes, rivers, wetlands), except where otherwise noted.

NOTE: This page only provides a general overview of snowmelt dynamics, instead focusing on snow storage. Numerous references are included throughout this page and the reader is referred to those for more detailed information. This manual also has a page on Cold climate impact on runoff management which provides a comprehensive discussion of cold climate considerations for managing urban stormwater and stormwater practices, including information on snowmelt runoff and snow management.

Dynamics of snowpack melt

Snow packs experience multiple freeze-thaw cycles through the winter and early spring. This results in partial melting and channelization of meltwater in the snowpack. Soluble pollutants are preferentially transported with this meltwater and accumulate near the base of the snowpack, while particulates are filtered during these partial melts. This accounts for the high release of soluble pollutants in the early phases of the melt.

Oberts (2010) described a three stage melt process in urban areas.

  • The first melt stage involves melting from paved areas. If this snow and ice contains deicers, the resulting meltwater is very saline water and also carries accumulated road pollutants into drainage systems and local receiving waters. If snow from these paved areas is collected and moved to a storage location, meltwater from these storage piles may contain high levels of soluble pollutants such as chloride, phosphorus, and some metals, as well as elevated biochemical oxygen demand.
  • The second melt stage involves the gradual melt of snow piles adjacent to road surfaces. This melt is similar to initial melting in stored snow piles, where initial chemical concentrations of soluble pollutants is relatively high, while sediment-bound pollutant concentrations are low.
  • The final stage of the snowmelt is the melt of pervious areas, such as grassed lawns. Chemical concentrations are typically lower but may be dominated by sediment and sediment-bound pollutants if the melt occurs quickly, as would occur with warm temperatures and/or rain falling on the snowpack.

Characteristics of snowmelt
Link to this table

General Pollutant Movement from a Snowpack 1.PNG
Early Middle Late X
High soluble content Remaining solubles, beginning of fine- to medium-solids High solids content
Low runoff volume, early infiltration Large runoff volume Large runoff volume (especially if rain-on-snow occurs), saturated soils
Initiated by chemical addition and/or solar radiation Largely driven by solar radiation, aided by salt Solar driven

Water quality and chemistry of snow and snowmelt runoff

The quality of runoff from melted snow is affected by the dynamics of snowmelt. The following information was extracted from the literature.

  • Initial meltwater is acidic and contains a higher percentage of soluble pollutants compared to later meltwater. The initial melt may comprise only 30% of the total volume but contain 60-90% of the total phosphorus and nitrogen released from the entire melt. Johannessen and Henriksen (1978) found in both laboratory and field studies that about 40 to 80% of 16 pollutants were released from experimental snowpacks with the first 30% of the liquid melt. Pollutant concentrations in the initial melt are typically 2 to 2.5 times greater than those in the remaining snowpack.
  • Street loads of sediment and toxic materials are at an annual peak at the onset of winter melt and early spring rainfalls.
  • The last period of melting contains lower concentrations of pollutants and is dominated by particulates and associated pollutants.

Water quality of snowmelt differs from non-winter runoff.

  • Data from Capital Region Watershed District (CRWD) indicates total phosphorus concentrations are similar (medians of 0.325 and 0.304 mg/L for snowmelt and non-snowmelt runoff, respectively), but concentrations are more variable in winter runoff (mean concentrations of 0.412 and 0.289 mg/L, respectively).
  • CRWD data shows higher concentrations of dissolved phosphorus in snowmelt compared to non-winter runoff (0.119 and 0.053 mg/L, respectively). Thus, dissolved phosphorus comprises about 35% of total phosphorus in snowmelt but only about 20% of total phosphorus in non-winter runoff.

Recommended references

  • Bratt, Anika R., Jacques C. Finlay, Sarah E. Hobbie, Benjamin D. Janke, Adam C. Worm, and Kathrine L. Kemmitt. 2017. Contribution of Leaf Litter to Nutrient Export during Winter Months in an Urban Residential Watershed Environ Sci Technol 51(6):3138-3147. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b06299.
  • Oberts, Gary L. 2000. Influence of Snowmelt Dynamics on Stormwater Runoff Quality. Metropolitan Council, St. Paul, MN. Watershed Protection Techniques. 1(2): 55-61

Recommendations for snow storage

This section provides guidance and recommendations for identifying appropriate snow storage areas, storing snow in those areas, and operations and maintenance of snow storage areas.

Siting recommendations

Methods for identifying baseflow contribution
  • Consult local groundwater maps and/or reports if they are available. Examples include county geologic atlases and hydrologic maps produced by the Unites States Geological Survey. Although these maps typically provide information at a watershed or regional level, they can generally be used to identify the importance of baseflow to major receiving waters, though they cannot typically be used to quantify baseflow.
  • Compare water table (groundwater) elevations to surface water elevations on topographic maps. This method is relatively easy to use if groundwater elevation data exists, but it is subject to inaccuracies as water levels fluctuate and cannot be used to quantify baseflow.
  • Utilize existing reports from local studies. Examples include using information from remediation studies. These reports are reasonably accurate if the study was conducted near the receiving water but cannot be used to quantify baseflow.
  • Baseflow separation methods are accurate but data intensive unless monitoring data exist for the receiving water. Link here for a video on computing baseflow using baseflow separation. These methods can be used to quantify baseflow contributions.
  • Solutes and tracers can be used to identify the occurrence of baseflow, but are difficult to use when quantifying baseflow.
  • Water balance methods can be used if adequate climatological data exist. These methods can be used to quantify baseflow.
  • Models can be used but are typically data intensive. Modeling can be used to quantify baseflow.

For more information, see [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7].

  • Identify receiving waters and assess the risk to them. Although identifying the contribution of baseflow to receiving waters can be challenging, it is important if meltwater will infiltrate and recharge groundwater. Potential receiving waters include the following.
    • Streams and rivers with a significant baseflow component
    • Streams and rivers with low baseflow component
    • Lakes and wetlands with a baseflow component
    • Lakes and wetlands with limited baseflow
    • Groundwater
  • Consult with your local community or municipality for technical guidelines on snow site management and operations.
  • Estimate how much snow disposal capacity is needed for the season so that an adequate number of disposal sites can be selected and prepared. Plan on snow storage capacity equal to 20-30 percent of the snow volume from the source area.
  • Determine potential pollutants of concern from the snow source areas
  • Considering potential pollutants of concern, when practicable, designate snow storage areas in locations that enable runoff to be directed to stormwater BMPs for treatment prior to discharge to a receiving water, including groundwater.
Pollutants of concern for different land uses
Land use Sediment Phosphorus Nitrogen Metals Organics Chloride BOD
Residential X X X
Commercial X X X
Industrial X X X X
Transportation X X X X
Park X X X
Parking lot X X
  • Snow storage should be avoided in the following situations.
    • Within a floodplain
    • Within 100 feet of active karst or areas where fractured bedrock is within 50 feet of the land surface
    • Within setback distances from receiving waters
    • On permeable soils (Hydrologic Soil Group A) where infiltration is not recommended or is prohibited under the Minnesota Construction Stormwater General Permit
    • In sanitary landfills, quarries, and gravel pits
    • In sections of parks or playgrounds that will be used for direct contact recreation after the snow season
    • In a receiving water (e.g. lake, river, wetland)
  • Prioritize potential sites based on the following selection criteria.
    • Upland sites are preferred
    • Slopes should be less than 6 percent, with slopes less than 2 percent preferred
    • Site that can be used indefinitely are preferred, particularly if the site can be engineered to minimize environmental impacts
    • Preference is for storage on permeable material that meets typical stormwater design standards found in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual (e.g. 3 feet separation to seasonal high water table)

Site recommendations

  • Storage
    • Snow should not be stored in stormwater treatment BMPs.
    • Snow may be stored above a vegetated filter strip
    • Do not locate snow storage areas on top of drain inlets.
    • Where applicable, locate storage areas outside of jurisdictional snow storage ROWs (usually 15-20 feet off of roadway).
    • Avoid siting snow storage on compacted or poorly draining soils (D soils), unless the meltwater is diverted to a treatment BMP that can treat the water quality volume.
    • For snow that may contain elevated levels of pollutants (e.g., commercial parking lots or roads), site snow storage on an impervious surface that drains to a stormwater treatment BMP.
    • Employ concave landscaped areas rather than mounded landscapes for snow storage.
    • Locate snow storage areas to maximize solar exposure and away from primary roadways to the greatest extent feasible
  • Site
    • Clearly identify the boundaries of the snow storage area to be visible under winter conditions.
    • When storing snow in close proximity to sensitive receiving waters, construct a berm around the perimeter of the snow storage area to contain the snowmelt or construct a vegetated filter strip between the receiving water and the snow storage area.
    • When storing snow in landscaped areas, plant with native and adapted species tolerant of snow storage (perennials that die back annually and shrubs/trees that can bend with weight, but not break).
    • For unpaved snow storage areas where snowplowing equipment will operate, the snow storage area should be covered with gravel or plowed to maintain 12 inches of packed snow to reduce soil disturbance and soil compaction.
    • Snow storage areas should be maintained to reduce erosion and to ensure easy removal of accumulated pollutants or sediments such as sand, road dirt, trash and salts.
    • A silt fence, earthen berm or equivalent barrier should be placed securely on the downgradient side of the snow disposal site. These types of structures can be used to direct meltwater and surface runoff to settling ponds or detention basins and to minimize the possible seepage of contaminants into groundwater. If earthen berms or channels are used to contain or direct the flow of melt water they should be stabilized to prevent soil erosion during high flows.
    • Plant stockpile areas with salt-tolerant ground cover species
  • Meltwater
    • When feasible, route meltwater to an appropriate stormwater treatment BMP. This is highly recommended if downstream receiving waters are sensitive to or impaired for pollutants of concern in the stored snow.
    • Provide appropriate pretreatment when routing meltwater to a downstream BMP. This may be achieved within the storage area if the storage area provides adequate storage volume to trap sediment left behind by melting snow
    • Meltwater should cross a gravel or erosion resistant buffer zone between the filter berm and surface water.
    • Sites which do not drain to treatment BMP should be contained by a snow fence, filter berm, small detention basin and buffer zone ( between the filter berm and storm sewer). An example of such a site might be a gravel parking lot which has sewer drainage.

Inspection and maintenance

  • Before and after winter, clean the designated snow storage area of accumulated sand, trash, and debris, and inspect any associated drainage outlets or conveyance facilities for damage or erosion.
  • Before and after winter, repair any damage or erosion that may have occurred to the snow storage area from snow removal equipment or other snow storage activities.
  • Restore the soil if needed. Regrade if channelization from snowmelt or flowing water has occurred. Reseed with appropriate vegetation.
  • Assess and if necessary, rehabilitate the infiltration capacity of the storage area and confirm conveyance facilities are functional.
  • Monitor the quality of snowmelt

References for snow disposal and storage

This page was last edited on 13 January 2022, at 17:13.


/* Manually replaced by abbott Aug 6 '21 */