Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
There is no universal definition of GI or GSI ([https://www.interreg-central.eu/Content.Node/Definitions.html link here fore more information]). Consequently, the terms are often interchanged, leading to confusion and misinterpretation. GSI practices are designed to function as stormwater practices first (e.g. flood control, treatment of runoff, volume control), but they can provide additional benefits. Though designed for stormwater function, GSI practices, where appropriate, should be designed to deliver multiple benefits (often termed "multiple stacked benefits". For more information on green infrastructure, ecosystem services, and sustainability, link to [[Multiple benefits of green infrastructure and role of green infrastructure in sustainability and ecosystem services]]. | There is no universal definition of GI or GSI ([https://www.interreg-central.eu/Content.Node/Definitions.html link here fore more information]). Consequently, the terms are often interchanged, leading to confusion and misinterpretation. GSI practices are designed to function as stormwater practices first (e.g. flood control, treatment of runoff, volume control), but they can provide additional benefits. Though designed for stormwater function, GSI practices, where appropriate, should be designed to deliver multiple benefits (often termed "multiple stacked benefits". For more information on green infrastructure, ecosystem services, and sustainability, link to [[Multiple benefits of green infrastructure and role of green infrastructure in sustainability and ecosystem services]]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {| class="wikitable" style="float:right; margin-left: 10px; width:500px;" | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! Benefit !! Effectiveness !! Notes | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Water quality || <font size=4><center>●</center></font size> || Most pollutants are retained in the engineered media, soil, or vadose zone. If transported to groundwater, concentrations of most pollutants are below water quality standards. Chloride is an exception. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Water quantity/supply || <font size=4><center>◕</center></font size> || Can provide effective flood control for small- and medium-intensity storms. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Energy savings || <font size=4><center>◔</center></font size> || | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Climate resiliency || <font size=4><center>◔</center></font size> || Flood control. Impacts on carbon sequestration are uncertain. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Air quality || <font size=4><center>◑</center></font size> || | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Habitat improvement || <font size=4><center>◕</center></font size> || Use of perennial vegetation and certain media mixes promote invertebrate communities, pollinators, birds, and potentially small mammals. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Community livability || <font size=4><center>◕</center></font size> || When vegetation is incorporated, aesthetically pleasing and can be incorporated into a wide range of land use settings. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Health benefits || <font size=4><center>◔</center></font size> || | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Economic savings || <font size=4><center>◔</center></font size> || Generally provide cost savings vs. conventional practices over the life of the practice. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |Macroscale benefits || <font size=4><center>◑</center></font size> || Macroscale effects depend on the size of the practice. Some infiltration practices, typically underground or tree trench systems, can be very large and have macroscale benefits. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | colspan="3" | Level of benefit: ◯ - none; <font size=5>◔</font size> - small; <font size=5>◑</font size> - moderate; <font size=5>◕</font size> - large; <font size=6>●</font size> - very high | ||
+ | |} | ||
==Green Infrastructure benefits of infiltration practices== | ==Green Infrastructure benefits of infiltration practices== |
Infiltration is the practice of draining water into soils, typically through engineered systems such as bioinfiltration (rain gardens), infiltration basins, dry swales with check dams, and permeable pavement. The practice of infiltration is beneficial for soils, maintaining natural hydrology, and has a significant water quality impact for downstream lakes, rivers, and ponds. Depending on design, stormwater infiltration practices can be a key component of GI to promote the health and well-being of animals, vegetation, and the people that rely upon these waters when designing sites.
Some of the more common infiltration practices include
For further reading on different types of infiltration, see Stormwater infiltration Best Management Practices and BMPs for stormwater infiltration.
Green infrastructure (GI) encompasses a wide array of practices, including stormwater management. Green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) encompasses a variety of practices primarily designed for managing stormwater runoff but that provide additional benefits such as habitat or aesthetic value.
There is no universal definition of GI or GSI (link here fore more information). Consequently, the terms are often interchanged, leading to confusion and misinterpretation. GSI practices are designed to function as stormwater practices first (e.g. flood control, treatment of runoff, volume control), but they can provide additional benefits. Though designed for stormwater function, GSI practices, where appropriate, should be designed to deliver multiple benefits (often termed "multiple stacked benefits". For more information on green infrastructure, ecosystem services, and sustainability, link to Multiple benefits of green infrastructure and role of green infrastructure in sustainability and ecosystem services.
Benefit | Effectiveness | Notes |
---|---|---|
Water quality | Most pollutants are retained in the engineered media, soil, or vadose zone. If transported to groundwater, concentrations of most pollutants are below water quality standards. Chloride is an exception. | |
Water quantity/supply | Can provide effective flood control for small- and medium-intensity storms. | |
Energy savings | ||
Climate resiliency | Flood control. Impacts on carbon sequestration are uncertain. | |
Air quality | ||
Habitat improvement | Use of perennial vegetation and certain media mixes promote invertebrate communities, pollinators, birds, and potentially small mammals. | |
Community livability | When vegetation is incorporated, aesthetically pleasing and can be incorporated into a wide range of land use settings. | |
Health benefits | ||
Economic savings | Generally provide cost savings vs. conventional practices over the life of the practice. | |
Macroscale benefits | Macroscale effects depend on the size of the practice. Some infiltration practices, typically underground or tree trench systems, can be very large and have macroscale benefits. | |
Level of benefit: ◯ - none; ◔ - small; ◑ - moderate; ◕ - large; ● - very high |
Maximizing specific green infrastructure (GI) benefits of constructed areas requires design considerations prior to installation. While site limitations cannot always be overcome, the following recommendations for a designer are given to maximize the GI benefit.
Note: Under the Minnesota Construction Stormwater Permit GI, particularly infiltration, must be considered first when selecting stormwater treatment methods. However, if Class D soils are present on the site infiltration practices cannot be used. Class A soils are the most desirable for infiltration but infiltration systems can also be successful with B or C soils. --- Maybe add a chart indicating soil penetrability of different HSG groups —
The Minnesota Stormwater Manual offers a chart to help designers with a cost-benefit analysis for infiltration linked here. The Pollution Control Agency allows for infiltration to be used as a credit source when meeting pollutant budgets for Total Suspended Solids (TSS) and Total Phosphorus (TP). The methodology for counting credits can be found here. Additional Information:
Support material Outside MSM Links to include/reference: Y - good picture graphic for infiltration and groundwater recharge and simple explanation of groundwater - https://www.usgs.gov/special-topics/water-science-school/science/infiltration-and-water-cycle
Y - Reference for part of above built table - neat pictures - https://www.ashbyma.gov/plan/subdivision%20docs/breitmaier/160923%20plans-docs/Stormwater%20Report/BMP%20-%20Infiltration%20Basin.pdf
Y - Cost benefit table - https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Cost-benefit_considerations_for_infiltration
M - good guidelines for developing green infrastructure though - https://coast.noaa.gov/data/docs/digitalcoast/gi-cost-benefit.pdf
Decent picture - Infiltration and the Water Cycle | U.S. Geological Survey (usgs.gov)
Additional References from the Minnesota Stormwater Manual