Green roofs have the ability to improve water quality, though the source of water should be taken into consideration, which can affect the effluent quality. Much of the water green roofs receive is in the form of precipitation which is less polluted compared to urban stormwater runoff. That being said, green roofs receive relatively clean water and are less likely to receive stormwater runoff and make a large impact on improving water quality. Nevertheless, green roofs can have a positive impact on water quality. A New York City (NYC) study monitored 4 green roofs over a period of 23 months and 100 storm events found that the pH runoff from green roofs was consistently higher than that from the roofs and precipitation with observed average pH’s equal to 7.28, 6.27, and 4.82 for the green roods, control roofs, and precipitations, respectively. As a result, green roods neutralized the acid rain. One thing to consider with green roofs is that influent Phosphorus (P) concentrations are lower than that of urban stormwater runoff. As a result, it is possible for green roofs to introduce P into their effluent rather than remove P since rainwater naturally has very low concentrations of P. The NYC study showed higher P concentration in green roof runoff than control roof runoff1. The probable source of phosphorus to runoff from the green roofs is fertilizer and soil2.
Tree trenches provide improvements to water quality by capturing, storing, and filtering stormwater runoff from storm events. Trees help slow down and temporarily store runoff and reduce pollutants by taking up nutrients and other pollutants from soils and water through their roots. As a result, trees transform pollutants into less harmful substances. The growth of tree roots helps increase soil infiltration capacity and rate allowing stormwater runoff to infiltrate into the ground rather than runoff into the adjacent storm sewer system or nearby water resources. Additionally, trees take up trace amounts of harmful chemicals, including metals, organic compounds, fuels, and solvents from the soil. This is called Phytoremediation. Inside the tree, these chemicals may be transformed into less harmful substances, used as nutrients and/or stored in roots, stems, and leaves3.
Bioretention BMPs (raingardens, bioswales, etc.) can have a profound impact on water quality. They allow water to pool for a period of time and then drain through infiltration. They effectively trap silt and other pollutants such as Total Suspended Solids (TSS), metals and hydrocarbons, Total Phosphorus (TP) & Total Nitrogen (TN), and bacteria, which are normally carried in runoff from impermeable surfaces. A study of two bioretention facilities at the University of Maryland campus were monitored and showed water quality improvements. Several storm events, all of the runoff flow was attenuated by the bioretention media and no flow exited the cells, resulting in zero pollutant discharge4. In all cases, the median pollutant output was lower than the input, indicating successful water quality improvement through the bioretention media. Median values for percent removals based on combined data sets were 47% for TSS, 76% for TP, 57% for copper, 83% for lead, 62% for zinc, and 83% for nitrate. It should be noted that the soil media used to build bioretention facilities should be taken into consideration. Some media can contain high levels of phosphorus and lead to a low performance for phosphorus removal. Therefore, it critical to make a proper media selection in order to achieve high phosphorus sequestration.
Permeable pavement allows for the absorption and infiltration of rainwater and snow melt onsite. It can reduce the concentration of some pollutants either physically (by trapping it in the pavement or soil), chemically (bacteria and other microbes can break down and utilize some pollutants), or biologically (plants that grow in-between some types of pavers can trap and store pollutants)5. Many of the pollutant concentrations that can be reduced from permeable pavement include Total Phosphorus, Dissolved Phosphorus, Total Suspended Solids, and Chlorides. Additionally, permeable pavements can reduce the need for road salt6.
Water re-use and water harvesting facilities can help improve water quality by capturing stormwater runoff and reduce offsite discharges into the storm sewer system and nearby water resources. The nature of stormwater re-use facilities vary widely, thus there is great variability in their effectiveness to remove storm water pollutants. Most water re-use projects have been developed to meet non-potable water demands, such as agriculture, landscape, public parks, irrigation, etc. In these cases, the stormwater that contains pollutants (phosphorus, sediment, excessive nutrient, metals, etc.) is captured for re-use and is reused for irrigation as opposed to being discharged to a body of water, possibly leading to the deterioration of that water body. Moreover, water re-use systems can be used to create or enhance wetlands and riparian (stream) habitats for streams that have been impaired or dried from water diversion. These systems are likely to remove more pollutants than those system which are used for the non-potable uses above.
Stormwater Ponds and wetlands are BMPs designed and constructed to settle out pollutants and nutrients (nitrogen, phosphorus, sediment, etc.) that are readily found in stormwater runoff. The removal of these pollutants helps prevent the degradation of downstream water bodies. It’s important to consider the timely and proper maintenance of stormwater ponds so that they function as designed. The lack of a proper maintenance plan for stormwater ponds can compromise their efficiency to remove pollutants and improve water quality. If not maintained properly, excess pollutants in ponds and wetlands may become sources of water quality issues as a poor water color/clarity/odor, low dissolved oxygen can lead to plant die off, and prevalence of algal blooms. Excess sediment can also clog structures within the BMPs impacting their overall effectiveness.
Vegetated swales that are designed and constructed with an impermeable check dam with/without an underdrain can improve water quality through treatment of polluted stormwater runoff through sedimentation, filtration, and infiltration. A study performed by the university of Maryland found a reduction of mass pollutant loads for Total Suspended Solids (TSS) by 38% - 62%, nitrate by 92% - 85%, and nitrite by 54% - 71%7. For swales with underdrains, the soil mix design should be carefully selected to ensure that there is no net increase in the export of pollutants, primarily nitrogen and phosphorus. For example, filtration media mixtures that contain a large percentage of compost can potentially export nutrients, such as nitrate and phosphorus, instead of retaining them.
Sand filters are an effective BMP for removing several common pollutants in stormwater runoff and can increase water quality to downstream water resources. Pollutants are removed through sedimentation and filtration processes. The highest pollutant removal efficiencies include sediment, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), and fecal coliform bacteria. There is a moderate removal efficiency for total metals, a lower removal efficiency for nutrients8. Lab effectiveness studies have shown a reduction in 99.98% protozoan, 90% - 99% bacterial, and 80% - 98% E. coli removal rates, respectively9.