m |
|||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
! Benefit !! Effectiveness !! Notes | ! Benefit !! Effectiveness !! Notes | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | Water quality || <font size= | + | | Water quality || <font size=4><center>◔</center></font size> || Benefits are maximized for bioinfiltration. Biofiltration may export phosphorus if not designed properly. |
|- | |- | ||
− | | Water quantity/supply || <font size= | + | | Water quantity/supply || <font size=6><center>●</center></font size> || Bioinfiltration helps mimic natural hydrology. Some rate control benefit. |
|- | |- | ||
− | | Energy savings || <center>&# | + | | Energy savings || <font size=6><center>●</center></font size> || |
|- | |- | ||
− | | Climate resiliency || <font size=4><center>&# | + | | Climate resiliency || <font size=4><center>◑</center></font size> || Provides some rate control. Impacts on carbon sequestration are uncertain. |
|- | |- | ||
− | | Air quality || <center>&# | + | | Air quality || <font size=4><center>◑</center></font size> || |
|- | |- | ||
− | | Habitat improvement || <font size=4><center>&# | + | | Habitat improvement || <font size=4><center>◑</center></font size> || Use of perennial vegetation and certain media mixes promote invertebrate communities. |
|- | |- | ||
− | | Community livability || <font size=4><center>&# | + | | Community livability || <font size=4><center>◔</center></font size> || Aesthetically pleasing and can be incorporated into a wide range of land use settings. |
|- | |- | ||
| Health benefits || <font size=4><center>◔</center></font size> || | | Health benefits || <font size=4><center>◔</center></font size> || | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | Economic savings || <font size=4><center>&# | + | | Economic savings || <font size=4><center>◑</center></font size> || Generally provide cost savings vs. conventional practices over the life of the practice. |
|- | |- | ||
− | |Macroscale benefits || <font size=4><center>&# | + | |Macroscale benefits || <font size=4><center>◔</center></font size> || Individual bioretention practices are typically microscale, but multiple bioretention practices, when incorporated into a landscape design, provide macroscale benefits such as wildlife corridors. |
|- | |- | ||
| colspan="3" | Level of benefit: ◯ - none; <font size=4>◔</font size>; - small; <font size=4>◑</font size> - moderate; <font size=4>◕</font size> - large; <font size=6>●</font size> - very high | | colspan="3" | Level of benefit: ◯ - none; <font size=4>◔</font size>; - small; <font size=4>◑</font size> - moderate; <font size=4>◕</font size> - large; <font size=6>●</font size> - very high |
Green roofs occur at the beginning of treatment trains. Green roofs provide filtering of suspended solids and pollutants associated with those solids, although total suspended solid (TSS) concentrations from traditional roofs are generally low. Green roofs provide both volume and rate control, thus decreasing the stormwater volume being delivered to downstream best management practices (BMPs).
Green infrastructure (GI) encompasses a wide array of practices, including stormwater management. Green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) encompasses a variety of practices primarily designed for managing stormwater runoff but that provide additional benefits such as habitat or aesthetic value.
There is no universal definition of GI or GSI (link here fore more information). Consequently, the terms are often interchanged, leading to confusion and misinterpretation. GSI practices are designed to function as stormwater practices first (e.g. flood control, treatment of runoff, volume control), but they can provide additional benefits. Though designed for stormwater function, GSI practices, where appropriate, should be designed to deliver multiple benefits (often termed "multiple stacked benefits". For more information on green infrastructure, ecosystem services, and sustainability, link to Multiple benefits of green infrastructure and role of green infrastructure in sustainability and ecosystem services.
Benefit | Effectiveness | Notes |
---|---|---|
Water quality | Benefits are maximized for bioinfiltration. Biofiltration may export phosphorus if not designed properly. | |
Water quantity/supply | Bioinfiltration helps mimic natural hydrology. Some rate control benefit. | |
Energy savings | ||
Climate resiliency | Provides some rate control. Impacts on carbon sequestration are uncertain. | |
Air quality | ||
Habitat improvement | Use of perennial vegetation and certain media mixes promote invertebrate communities. | |
Community livability | Aesthetically pleasing and can be incorporated into a wide range of land use settings. | |
Health benefits | ||
Economic savings | Generally provide cost savings vs. conventional practices over the life of the practice. | |
Macroscale benefits | Individual bioretention practices are typically microscale, but multiple bioretention practices, when incorporated into a landscape design, provide macroscale benefits such as wildlife corridors. | |
Level of benefit: ◯ - none; ◔; - small; ◑ - moderate; ◕ - large; ● - very high |
Because of their use of vegetation in conjunction with building design, green roofs provide multiple green infrastructure benefits.
Green roofs employ engineered media that is effective at removing solids, most metals, and most organic chemicals. Green roofs are generally not effective at retaining phosphorus because of the organic matter content in the media. They therefore are likely to lose phosphorus during the first years after establishment, but may gradually retain phosphorus over time.
Maximizing specific green infrastructure (GI) benefits of green roofs requires design considerations prior to constructing the practice. While site limitations cannot always be overcome, the following recommendations maximize the GI benefit of green roofs.