Search results
Create the page "Design criteria" on this wiki! See also the search results found.
- ==Design phase maintenance considerations== Implicit in the design guidance in the previous sections, many design elements of stormwater wetland systems can minimize the maintenance burden7 KB (963 words) - 02:57, 15 December 2022
- {{Alert|''REQUIRED'' - Indicates design standards stipulated by the [http://www.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/water/wat <p>''HIGHLY RECOMMENDED'' - Indicates design guidance that is extremely beneficial or necessary for proper functioning o9 KB (1,171 words) - 21:56, 24 January 2023
- **Upper 95% confidence limit concentrations for metals were below Florida criteria except for arsenic in catch basins; and iron, aluminum, and Beta-BHC in str ...e typically close to or more than an order of magnitude lower than Florida criteria18 KB (2,457 words) - 15:00, 17 January 2023
- ...roposed facilities. This is the time to make sure that all aspects of the design, schedule, submittals and permits are understood and any ambiguities resolv ...ge structures can often be used as sediment control structures, as long as design capacity is restored at the end of the construction/stabilization phase.6 KB (892 words) - 20:24, 17 November 2022
- *[[Design criteria for filtration]] Minimal Impact Design Standards pages6 KB (803 words) - 23:44, 6 December 2022
- For the wet swale BMP, the only design parameter that must be input by the user is BMP Watershed Area. *The wet swale has been properly [[Design criteria for filtration|designed]], [[Construction specifications for filtration|con13 KB (2,199 words) - 22:24, 23 November 2022
- ...rmwater/index.html MPCA Construction General Permit (CGP)], which includes design and performance standards for permanent stormwater management systems. Thes ...III.C.4 of the permit. Due to the statewide prevalence of the MPCA permit, design guidance in this section is presented with the assumption that the permit d11 KB (1,662 words) - 19:42, 11 August 2022
- ...''wet ponds''']</span> and <span title="Stormwater wetlands are similar in design to stormwater ponds and mainly differ by their variety of water depths and *[[Design criteria for stormwater ponds]]7 KB (891 words) - 15:28, 27 December 2022
- ...t) should be used. A soil phosphorus test using the Mehlich-3 (or [[Design criteria for bioretention#Notes about soil phosphorus testing: applicability and int A soil phosphorus test using the Mehlich-3 (or [[Design criteria for bioretention#Notes about soil phosphorus testing: applicability and int19 KB (2,815 words) - 14:19, 17 January 2023
- *Permittees must design infiltration systems such that pre-existing hydrologic conditions of wetlan *Permittees must design infiltration systems to provide a [https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index12 KB (1,682 words) - 19:10, 8 December 2022
- ...antity control process. Bioretention employs a simplistic, site-integrated design that provides opportunity for runoff <span title="Infiltration Best Managem ...us/index.php?title=Liners_for_stormwater_management liner], is also a good design option for treating potential <span title="Stormwater Hotspots (PSHs) are a19 KB (2,778 words) - 19:25, 27 December 2022
- .... Bioretention, when designed with an underdrain and liner, is also a good design option for treating Potential stormwater hotspots. Bioretention is extremel ...detail in the permeable pavement [[Design criteria for permeable pavement|design section]].15 KB (2,185 words) - 19:28, 27 December 2022
- ...ater_infiltration_Best_Management_Practices '''infiltration''']</span>, ([[Design infiltration rates|A or B soils]]) are considered infiltration practices. D ==Infeasibility criteria==23 KB (3,441 words) - 02:41, 15 December 2022
- ...ments, recommendations and other information for using the Minimal Impacts Design Standards (MIDS) calculator for bioretention BMPs. Links to MIDS pages and ...he user. These correspond with soils and infiltration rates contained in [[Design infiltration rates|this Manual]]. The user may also enter a different value23 KB (3,556 words) - 13:18, 29 January 2023
- ...ortant tool for retention and detention of stormwater runoff. Depending on design and construction, swales may provide additional benefits, including cleaner ...feature surface/subsurface runoff storage seams and an energy dissipation design that is aimed at attenuating the flow to a desired level through energy and25 KB (3,698 words) - 02:39, 15 December 2022
- *[[Design criteria for Infiltration trench]]3 KB (343 words) - 14:46, 11 December 2022
- *Design Phase Maintenance Considerations; ==Design phase maintenance considerations==9 KB (1,184 words) - 18:55, 22 November 2022
- *MacRae, C.R., 1993. An Alternate Design Approach for the Control of Instream Erosion Potential in Urbanizing Waters ...sion based criteria for stormwater management. It emphasizes that multiple criteria are needed to ensure that the problem to be addressed by stormwater managem9 KB (1,320 words) - 12:47, 10 February 2023
- *Design Phase Maintenance Considerations; ==Design phase maintenance considerations==9 KB (1,196 words) - 02:59, 15 December 2022
- <sup>3</sup> – EPA 2012 Recreational Water Quality Criteria – Recommendation 1 (Estimated illness rate = 36/1000)<br> <sup>5</sup> –Useful for distribution system design, but often used a general indicator parameter, too.<br>3 KB (549 words) - 20:16, 3 August 2022