m |
m |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{alert|This page is an edit and testing page use by the wiki authors. It is not a content page for the Manual. Information on this page may not be accurate and should not be used as guidance in managing stormwater.|alert-danger}} | {{alert|This page is an edit and testing page use by the wiki authors. It is not a content page for the Manual. Information on this page may not be accurate and should not be used as guidance in managing stormwater.|alert-danger}} | ||
+ | Swales | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="float:right; margin-left: 10px; width:500px;" | {| class="wikitable" style="float:right; margin-left: 10px; width:500px;" | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 28: | Line 29: | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | Permeable pavement | ||
+ | {| class="wikitable" style="float:right; margin-left: 10px; width:500px;" | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! Benefit !! Effectiveness !! Notes | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Water quality || <font size=6><center>●</center></font size> || Benefits are maximized for bioinfiltration. Biofiltration may export phosphorus if not designed properly. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Water quantity/supply || <font size=4><center>◔</center></font size> || Bioinfiltration helps mimic natural hydrology. Some rate control benefit. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Energy savings || <center>◯</center> || | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Climate resiliency || <font size=4><center>◔</center></font size> || Provides some rate control. Impacts on carbon sequestration are uncertain. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Air quality || <center>◯</center> || | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Habitat improvement || <font size=4><center>◕</center></font size> || Use of perennial vegetation and certain media mixes promote invertebrate communities. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Community livability || <font size=4><center>◕</center></font size> || Aesthetically pleasing and can be incorporated into a wide range of land use settings. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Health benefits || <font size=4><center>◔</center></font size> || | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Economic savings || <font size=4><center>◔</center></font size> || Generally provide cost savings vs. conventional practices over the life of the practice. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |Macroscale benefits || <font size=4><center>◑</center></font size> || Individual bioretention practices are typically microscale, but multiple bioretention practices, when incorporated into a landscape design, provide macroscale benefits such as wildlife corridors. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | colspan="3" | Level of benefit: ◯ - none; <font size=4>◔</font size>; - small; <font size=4>◑</font size> - moderate; <font size=4>◕</font size> - large; <font size=6>●</font size> - very high | ||
+ | |} | ||
Line 34: | Line 62: | ||
+ | <!-- | ||
=Biochar= | =Biochar= | ||
Line 89: | Line 118: | ||
*[https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3291&context=etd characterization and engineering] | *[https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3291&context=etd characterization and engineering] | ||
*[https://people.clas.ufl.edu/azimmer/files/Publication-pdf/Zhao-Zimmerman-13_Heterogeneity-of-biochar-properties-as-a-function-of-feedstock-sources-and-prod-temp.pdf Heterogeneity of biochar properties as a function of feedstock sources and production temperatures] | *[https://people.clas.ufl.edu/azimmer/files/Publication-pdf/Zhao-Zimmerman-13_Heterogeneity-of-biochar-properties-as-a-function-of-feedstock-sources-and-prod-temp.pdf Heterogeneity of biochar properties as a function of feedstock sources and production temperatures] | ||
− | + | --> | |
Swales
Benefit | Effectiveness | Notes |
---|---|---|
Water quality | Benefits are maximized for bioinfiltration. Biofiltration may export phosphorus if not designed properly. | |
Water quantity/supply | Bioinfiltration helps mimic natural hydrology. Some rate control benefit. | |
Energy savings | ||
Climate resiliency | Provides some rate control. Impacts on carbon sequestration are uncertain. | |
Air quality | ||
Habitat improvement | Use of perennial vegetation and certain media mixes promote invertebrate communities. | |
Community livability | Aesthetically pleasing and can be incorporated into a wide range of land use settings. | |
Health benefits | ||
Economic savings | Generally provide cost savings vs. conventional practices over the life of the practice. | |
Macroscale benefits | Individual bioretention practices are typically microscale, but multiple bioretention practices, when incorporated into a landscape design, provide macroscale benefits such as wildlife corridors. | |
Level of benefit: ◯ - none; ◔; - small; ◑ - moderate; ◕ - large; ● - very high |
Permeable pavement
Benefit | Effectiveness | Notes |
---|---|---|
Water quality | Benefits are maximized for bioinfiltration. Biofiltration may export phosphorus if not designed properly. | |
Water quantity/supply | Bioinfiltration helps mimic natural hydrology. Some rate control benefit. | |
Energy savings | ||
Climate resiliency | Provides some rate control. Impacts on carbon sequestration are uncertain. | |
Air quality | ||
Habitat improvement | Use of perennial vegetation and certain media mixes promote invertebrate communities. | |
Community livability | Aesthetically pleasing and can be incorporated into a wide range of land use settings. | |
Health benefits | ||
Economic savings | Generally provide cost savings vs. conventional practices over the life of the practice. | |
Macroscale benefits | Individual bioretention practices are typically microscale, but multiple bioretention practices, when incorporated into a landscape design, provide macroscale benefits such as wildlife corridors. | |
Level of benefit: ◯ - none; ◔; - small; ◑ - moderate; ◕ - large; ● - very high |