m |
m |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
*ASCE/EPA. [http://www.bmpdatabase.org/ International BMP Database]. | *ASCE/EPA. [http://www.bmpdatabase.org/ International BMP Database]. | ||
*Atlanta Regional Commission. [http://www.georgiaplanning.com/watertoolkit/Documents/WaterProtectionIssues/Preface.pdf Georgia Stormwater Management Manual]. 2001. | *Atlanta Regional Commission. [http://www.georgiaplanning.com/watertoolkit/Documents/WaterProtectionIssues/Preface.pdf Georgia Stormwater Management Manual]. 2001. | ||
+ | *Bannerman, Roger. 2013. Personal Communication. | ||
+ | *Bannerman, R. 2012. WDNR What Are We Learning About Selecting a Soil Media for Bioretention Systems? Presentation to NASECA February 2, 2012. | ||
*Bouwer, H. and R. C. Rice. 1989. [http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=301515 Effect of Water Depth in Ground-water Recharge Basins on Infiltration]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Vol. 115, No. 4, pp. 556-567. | *Bouwer, H. and R. C. Rice. 1989. [http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=301515 Effect of Water Depth in Ground-water Recharge Basins on Infiltration]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Vol. 115, No. 4, pp. 556-567. | ||
*Claytor, R.A., and T.R. Schueler. 1996. ''Design of Stormwater Filtering Systems''. The Center for Watershed Protection, Silver Spring, MD. | *Claytor, R.A., and T.R. Schueler. 1996. ''Design of Stormwater Filtering Systems''. The Center for Watershed Protection, Silver Spring, MD. | ||
+ | *Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District. 10/25/2012. Dakota County Jenson Lake Stormwater Retrofit Project Factsheet. | ||
+ | *Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District. 2011. Low Impact Development Standards For Dakota County, Minnesota. | ||
*Davis, A.P., M. Shokouhian, H. Sharma and C. Minani. 1998. ''Optimization of Bioretention for Design for Water Quality and Hydrologic Characteristics''. n.p. | *Davis, A.P., M. Shokouhian, H. Sharma and C. Minani. 1998. ''Optimization of Bioretention for Design for Water Quality and Hydrologic Characteristics''. n.p. | ||
*Glover, R., 1960. [http://www.ars.usda.gov/SP2UserFiles/Place/54021000/Oldpapers/GroundWaterRecharge.pdf Mathematical Derivations as Pertain to Ground-water Recharge]. Report CER60REG70. Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Fort Collins, Colorado. 81 pp. | *Glover, R., 1960. [http://www.ars.usda.gov/SP2UserFiles/Place/54021000/Oldpapers/GroundWaterRecharge.pdf Mathematical Derivations as Pertain to Ground-water Recharge]. Report CER60REG70. Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Fort Collins, Colorado. 81 pp. | ||
*Hantush, M. 1967. [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/WR003i001p00227/abstract Growth and Decay of Ground-water-Mounds in Response to Uniform Percolation]. Water Resources Research. 3(1): 227-234. | *Hantush, M. 1967. [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/WR003i001p00227/abstract Growth and Decay of Ground-water-Mounds in Response to Uniform Percolation]. Water Resources Research. 3(1): 227-234. | ||
+ | *Hathaway, J. M., Hunt, W. F., Graves, A. K., and Wright, J. D. 2011. ''Field evaluation of bioretention indicator bacteria sequestration in Wilmington NC''. J. Environ. Eng., 137(12), 1103–1113. | ||
+ | *Hunt, W.F. and W.G. Lord. 2006. Bioretention Performance, Design, and Construction and Maintenance. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service. | ||
+ | *Hunt, W., Davis, A., and Traver, R. 2012. ''Meeting Hydrologic and Water Quality Goals through Targeted Bioretention Design''. J. Environ. Eng., 138(6), 698–707. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)`EE.1943-7870.0000504 | ||
+ | *Isensee, Mike. 2013. Personal Communication. | ||
*Low Impact Design Center, Inc. 2005. [http://www.lid-stormwater.net Urban Design Tools, Internet Resource]. Beltsville, MD. | *Low Impact Design Center, Inc. 2005. [http://www.lid-stormwater.net Urban Design Tools, Internet Resource]. Beltsville, MD. | ||
*Metropolitan Council. 2001. [http://www.metrocouncil.org/environment/Water/BMP/manual.htm Minnesota Urban Small Sites BMP Manual, Stormwater Best Management Practice for Cold Climates]. St. Paul, MN. | *Metropolitan Council. 2001. [http://www.metrocouncil.org/environment/Water/BMP/manual.htm Minnesota Urban Small Sites BMP Manual, Stormwater Best Management Practice for Cold Climates]. St. Paul, MN. | ||
*Natural Resources Conservation Service. 1986. [http://www.hydrocad.net/tr-55.htm Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds]. Technical Release 55 (TR-55). | *Natural Resources Conservation Service. 1986. [http://www.hydrocad.net/tr-55.htm Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds]. Technical Release 55 (TR-55). | ||
− | *Prince George’s County. 2002. [ | + | *Prince George’s County. 2002. [https://www.slideshare.net/Sotirakou964/md-prince-georges-county-bioretention-manual Bioretention Manual]. Programs & Planning Division Department of Environmental Resources, Landover, MD. |
*Rawls, W., D. Brakensiek, and K. Saxton, 1982. [http://www.envsci.rutgers.edu/~gimenez/SoilPhysics/HomeworkCommonFiles/Rawls%20et%20al%201982.pdf Estimation of Soil Water Properties]. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 1316 – 1320 and 1328. | *Rawls, W., D. Brakensiek, and K. Saxton, 1982. [http://www.envsci.rutgers.edu/~gimenez/SoilPhysics/HomeworkCommonFiles/Rawls%20et%20al%201982.pdf Estimation of Soil Water Properties]. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 1316 – 1320 and 1328. | ||
*Rawls, W., D. Giminez, and R. Grossman. 1998. [http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=1597148 Use of Soil Texture, Bulk Density and Slope of water Retention Curve to Predict Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity]. ASAE. Vol. 41(4). pp. 983 – 988. | *Rawls, W., D. Giminez, and R. Grossman. 1998. [http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=1597148 Use of Soil Texture, Bulk Density and Slope of water Retention Curve to Predict Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity]. ASAE. Vol. 41(4). pp. 983 – 988. | ||
− | *Shaw, D. and R. Schmidt. 2003. [ | + | *Shaw, D. and R. Schmidt. 2003. [https://www.pca.state.mn.us/water/plants-stormwater-design Plants for Stormwater Design]. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, St. Paul, MN. |
*South Washington Watershed District (SWWD). 2005. [http://www.swwdmn.org/projects/projects-completed/ 2004 Infiltration Monitoring Program Final Report]. Emmons and Olivier Resources, Inc. | *South Washington Watershed District (SWWD). 2005. [http://www.swwdmn.org/projects/projects-completed/ 2004 Infiltration Monitoring Program Final Report]. Emmons and Olivier Resources, Inc. | ||
*State of New Jersey]. 2004. [http://www.state.nj.us/dep/stormwater/bmp_manual2.htm New Jersey Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual]. Department of Watershed Management. NJ. | *State of New Jersey]. 2004. [http://www.state.nj.us/dep/stormwater/bmp_manual2.htm New Jersey Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual]. Department of Watershed Management. NJ. | ||
Line 29: | Line 37: | ||
*[[Assessing the performance of bioretention]] | *[[Assessing the performance of bioretention]] | ||
*[[Cost-benefit considerations for bioretention]] | *[[Cost-benefit considerations for bioretention]] | ||
+ | *[[Calculating credits for bioretention]] | ||
*[[Soil amendments to enhance phosphorus sorption]] | *[[Soil amendments to enhance phosphorus sorption]] | ||
*[[Summary of permit requirements for bioretention]] | *[[Summary of permit requirements for bioretention]] |