m |
m |
||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
*The infiltration practice is less than 200 feet from the toe of a [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Stormwater_infiltration_and_setback_%28separation%29_distances#Site_topography_and_slopes slope greater than or equal to 20 percent]. | *The infiltration practice is less than 200 feet from the toe of a [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Stormwater_infiltration_and_setback_%28separation%29_distances#Site_topography_and_slopes slope greater than or equal to 20 percent]. | ||
*The infiltration practice receives discharges from a confirmed stormwater hotspot (see [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Potential_stormwater_hotspots#Determining_if_a_PSH_is_a_hotspot guidance]) and [[Pre-treatment|pretreatment]] practices cannot be used to achieve acceptable pollutant concentrations in the runoff. There is no specific pollutant concentration that defines a stormwater hotspot and the pollutant characteristics and removal capability of the BMP must be considered in making this determination. A suggested approach is to apply the expected pollutant removal for the BMP to the expected concentration of the pollutant and compare the remaining concentration to the water quality standard (see water quality standards for [https://www.revisor.mn.gov/rules/?id=7050 surface water] and [http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/eh/risk/rules/water/ groundwater]). For example, the drinking water standard for zinc is 2 milligrams per liter (mg/L). The concentration of zinc in runoff from an area is 6 mg/L. Expected pollutant removal rates are 65 percent for underground infiltration and 80 percent for bioinfiltration. The resulting concentrations in effluent beneath the infiltration systems are 2.1 mg/L for underground infiltration and 1.2 mg/L for bioinfiltration. Using the drinking standard as the criteria for determining the feasibility of infiltration, bioinfiltration would be acceptable and underground infiltration would not be acceptable. | *The infiltration practice receives discharges from a confirmed stormwater hotspot (see [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Potential_stormwater_hotspots#Determining_if_a_PSH_is_a_hotspot guidance]) and [[Pre-treatment|pretreatment]] practices cannot be used to achieve acceptable pollutant concentrations in the runoff. There is no specific pollutant concentration that defines a stormwater hotspot and the pollutant characteristics and removal capability of the BMP must be considered in making this determination. A suggested approach is to apply the expected pollutant removal for the BMP to the expected concentration of the pollutant and compare the remaining concentration to the water quality standard (see water quality standards for [https://www.revisor.mn.gov/rules/?id=7050 surface water] and [http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/eh/risk/rules/water/ groundwater]). For example, the drinking water standard for zinc is 2 milligrams per liter (mg/L). The concentration of zinc in runoff from an area is 6 mg/L. Expected pollutant removal rates are 65 percent for underground infiltration and 80 percent for bioinfiltration. The resulting concentrations in effluent beneath the infiltration systems are 2.1 mg/L for underground infiltration and 1.2 mg/L for bioinfiltration. Using the drinking standard as the criteria for determining the feasibility of infiltration, bioinfiltration would be acceptable and underground infiltration would not be acceptable. | ||
− | *A mound forming beneath the infiltration practice will extend into the practice. The expected mound elevation can be [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Stormwater_infiltration_and_groundwater_mounding#How_to_predict_the_extent_of_a_mound calculated using guidance in this manual] | + | *A [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Stormwater_infiltration_and_groundwater_mounding groundwater mound] forming beneath the infiltration practice will extend into the practice. The expected mound elevation can be [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Stormwater_infiltration_and_groundwater_mounding#How_to_predict_the_extent_of_a_mound calculated using guidance in this manual]. |
− | |||
− | |||
==Information needed== | ==Information needed== |
This page provides guidance to help determine if infiltration Best Management Practices (BMPs) can be utilized at a site. Infiltration BMPs include bioinfiltration, infiltration basin, infiltration trench, underground infiltration, permeable pavement, and tree trench or tree box with no underdrain. Note that some infiltration occurs in BMPs with underdrains, particularly if the underdrain is raised above the bottom of the BMP. If no infiltration is desired at a site, a liner should be used.
Infiltration is often utilized at a site to meet a regulatory requirement or a performance goal for stormwater volume. The following discussion does not specifically focus on utilizing infiltration to meet a requirement or performance goal, although there is a section that provides information for determining the amount of infiltration feasible at a site.
The following table can be used to determine if infiltration is prohibited or not recommended. Discussion of conditions where infiltration may be acceptable when site constraints exist is provided below.
Summary of situations where infiltration of stormwater runoff is prohibited or not recommended.
Link to this table
Condition | Prohibited | Not recommended | Not recommended unless conditions are met1 |
---|---|---|---|
Local rule or ordinance prohibits infiltration | X | ||
BMP is < 100 feet from drinking well in sensitive aquifer3 | X | ||
BMP is < 50 feet from drinking well in a non-sensitive aquifer3 | X | ||
BMP receives discharges from vehicle fueling and maintenance areas | X | ||
There is less than 3 of separation to bedrock or saturated soil | if CGP applies2 | X | |
BMP receives discharges from certain industrial facilities4 | if CGP applies | ||
BMP is in areas where high levels of contaminants in soil or groundwater will be mobilized by the infiltrating stormwater | if CGP applies | X | |
BMP is located in D soils | if CGP applies | X | |
BMP is 1,000 feet up-gradient or 100 feet down-gradient of active karst | if CGP applies | X | |
BMP is located within an Emergency Response Area in a DWSMA exhibiting high or very high vulnerability | if CGP applies | X | |
BMP is located within an Emergency Response Area (ERA) in a DWSMA exhibiting moderate vulnerability, or outside an ERA in a DWSMA exhibiting high or very high vulnerability | if CGP applies, unless a higher engineering review indicates infiltration is acceptable | X | |
BMP is located in soils with infiltration rate > 8.3 in/hr | if CGP applies | X | |
BMP is located within 1 year travel time of drinking supply well | X | ||
BMP located within 10 feet of building or structure | X | ||
BMP located within 35 feet of a septic system | X | ||
BMP located less than 200 feet from crest of slope that exceeds 20% | X | ||
BMP receives discharges from a confirmed stormwater hotspot | X | ||
A groundwater mound formed beneath the BMP during infiltration extends into the BMP | X |
1see discussion for conditions under which infiltration is acceptable.
2CGP = Construction Stormwater General Permit
3See Minnesota Rules Chapter 4725
4To determine if infiltration is allowed for a specific industrial sector or subsector, go to the list of sectors, select the sector of interest, and review section 8 for that sector (Use of Infiltration Devices and/or Industrial Stormwater Ponds for Stormwater Treatment and Disposal)
If infiltration is not prohibited but any of the following conditions apply, infiltration is not recommended.
Site review is necessary to determine the feasibility of infiltrating stormwater runoff at a site. A site review includes both a review of information and field sampling. The following information may be of use in conducting a site review
The amount of infiltration that can be achieved at a site depends on the soil properties and BMP size. The size of the BMP may be impacted by separation distances that can be achieved. Required or recommended separation distances are shown in the table below. For example, if bedrock is within 5 feet of the land surface, the BMP depth can only be 2 feet to achieve the 3 foot separation from bedrock unless the BMP is raised to achieve greater separation.
Required and recommended minimum vertical and horizontal separation distances. This represents the minimum distance from the infiltration practice to the structure of concern. If the structure is above-ground, the distance is measured from the edge of the BMP to the structure. If the structure is underground, the vertical separation distance represents the distance from the point of infiltration through the bottom of the system to the structure, while the horizontal separation (often called setback) distance is the shortest distance from the edge of the system to the structure.
Link to this table
Structure | Distance (feet) | Requirement or recommendation | Note(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vertical | Saturated soil | 3 | Requirement1 | |
Bedrock | 3 | Requirement1 | ||
Horizontal | Public supply well | 100 for sensitive wells; 50 for others3 | Requirement | |
Building/structure/property line2 | 10 | Recommended | ||
Surface water | none unless local requirements exist | If nearby stream is impaired for chloride, see [1] | ||
Septic system | 35 | Recommended | ||
Contaminated soil/groundwater | No specific distance. Infiltration must not mobilize contaminants. | |||
Slope | 200 | Recommended | from toe of slope >= 20% | |
Karst | 1000 up-gradient 100 down-gradient | Requirement1 | active karst |
1 Required under the Construction Stormwater General Permit
2 Minimum with slopes directed away from the building
3If treating an average of 10,000 gallons per day; otherwise separation distance is 300 feet
The basic equation used to size a BMP is
Where
BMPs with ponded water include bioinfiltration, infiltration trench, and infiltration basin. BMPs with water stored in the soil or media include tree trench, tree box, permeable pavement, and swale with a bioretention base. Specific equations for sizing can be found within articles discussing credits for individual BMPs.
Field verification should be made for separation distances, depth to water, depth to bedrock, and presence of karst. Recommended numbers of borings and pits are presented in this Manual.
Field sampling and evaluation is recommended for determining soil properties (e.g. infiltration rate, presence of gleying and mottling). Recommended numbers of borings and pits are presented in this Manual.
Guidance for determining the feasibility of infiltrating stormwater has been developed for locations outside Minnesota. Examples can be found through a simple Google search on stormwater infiltration guidance.
Two examples that may be useful are indicated below.
In addition to the above two references, the Minimal Impact Design Standards (MIDS) design sequence flowchart can be used to make decisions about the feasibility of infiltrating stormwater at a site. Although the flowchart focuses on MIDS performance goals, it can be adapted to help determine if infiltration restrictions exist at a site. Potential constraints to infiltration, with links to the MIDS flowchart and other guidance in this manual, are shown below.