m |
m |
||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
The Minnesota Department of Health and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency developed joint guidance for determining the applicability of infiltration in a Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA). A step-by-step process for determining if infiltration is allowed and appropriate in a DWSMA is shown on the right. You can also access this flowchart at [[file:Flow Chart - MDH Stormwater Guidance for Sites in Drinking Water Supply Management Areas.pdf]]. Guidance and additional information to support the flowchart is found at [[file:Evaluating Proposed Stormwater Infiltration Projects in Vulnerable Wellhead Protection Areas.docx]]. | The Minnesota Department of Health and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency developed joint guidance for determining the applicability of infiltration in a Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA). A step-by-step process for determining if infiltration is allowed and appropriate in a DWSMA is shown on the right. You can also access this flowchart at [[file:Flow Chart - MDH Stormwater Guidance for Sites in Drinking Water Supply Management Areas.pdf]]. Guidance and additional information to support the flowchart is found at [[file:Evaluating Proposed Stormwater Infiltration Projects in Vulnerable Wellhead Protection Areas.docx]]. | ||
− | ===Step 1a | + | ===Step 1a=== |
+ | Is the site located in a DWSMA? | ||
*If No, proceed observing state and local stormwater requirements. See [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Dummy_page_2#Additional_requirements_and_guidance additional requirements and guidance below]. | *If No, proceed observing state and local stormwater requirements. See [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Dummy_page_2#Additional_requirements_and_guidance additional requirements and guidance below]. | ||
*If Yes, proceed to Step 1b | *If Yes, proceed to Step 1b | ||
− | ===Step 1b | + | ===Step 1b=== |
+ | Is a [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/III._STORMWATER_DISCHARGE_DESIGN_REQUIREMENTS#III.D._PERMANENT_STORMWATER_MANAGEMENT_SYSTEM Construction Stormwater General Permit] required? | ||
*If Yes, proceed to Step 2 | *If Yes, proceed to Step 2 | ||
*If No, proceed to Step 3 | *If No, proceed to Step 3 | ||
− | ===Step 2 | + | ===Step 2=== |
+ | Is there a Local Government Unit with a current Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System permit that allows infiltration? | ||
*If No, infiltration is prohibited by [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/III._STORMWATER_DISCHARGE_DESIGN_REQUIREMENTS#III.D._PERMANENT_STORMWATER_MANAGEMENT_SYSTEM Part III.D.1.j.vii of the CSW permit]. | *If No, infiltration is prohibited by [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/III._STORMWATER_DISCHARGE_DESIGN_REQUIREMENTS#III.D._PERMANENT_STORMWATER_MANAGEMENT_SYSTEM Part III.D.1.j.vii of the CSW permit]. | ||
*If Yes, proceed to Step 3 | *If Yes, proceed to Step 3 | ||
− | ===Step 3 | + | ===Step 3=== |
+ | Is the site in a portion of the DWSMA that exhibits very high, high, or moderate vulnerability as defined by Minnesota Rules (4720.5100-5590)? | ||
*If No, proceed observing state and local stormwater requirements. See [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Dummy_page_2#Additional_requirements_and_guidance additional requirements and guidance below]. | *If No, proceed observing state and local stormwater requirements. See [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Dummy_page_2#Additional_requirements_and_guidance additional requirements and guidance below]. | ||
*If Yes, proceed to Step 4 | *If Yes, proceed to Step 4 | ||
− | ===Step 4 | + | ===Step 4=== |
+ | Is the site in the Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA) of an aquifer exhibiting fracture flow or [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Karst karst] conditions and that has less than 50 feet of unfractured geologic cover? | ||
*If Yes, infiltration is generally not appropriate due to the potential for adverse effects to the aquifer used for drinking water supply. Consider other stormwater handling procedures such as stormwater retention and conveyance outside of the WHPA or moving the infiltration area to a non-vulnerable part of the DWSMA. For more information, discuss with MDH subject matter experts or the hydrologist or planner for the DWSMA or with stormwater staff at the MPCA. | *If Yes, infiltration is generally not appropriate due to the potential for adverse effects to the aquifer used for drinking water supply. Consider other stormwater handling procedures such as stormwater retention and conveyance outside of the WHPA or moving the infiltration area to a non-vulnerable part of the DWSMA. For more information, discuss with MDH subject matter experts or the hydrologist or planner for the DWSMA or with stormwater staff at the MPCA. | ||
*If No, proceed to Step 5 | *If No, proceed to Step 5 | ||
− | ===Step 5 | + | ===Step 5=== |
+ | Is the site within the Emergency Response Area (ERA) and is vulnerability very high or high? | ||
*If Yes, infiltration is generally not appropriate due to the potential for adverse effects to the aquifer used for drinking water supply. Consider other stormwater handling procedures such as stormwater retention and conveyance outside of the WHPA or moving the infiltration area to a non-vulnerable part of the DWSMA. For more information, discuss with MDH subject matter experts or the hydrologist or planner for the DWSMA or with stormwater staff at the MPCA. | *If Yes, infiltration is generally not appropriate due to the potential for adverse effects to the aquifer used for drinking water supply. Consider other stormwater handling procedures such as stormwater retention and conveyance outside of the WHPA or moving the infiltration area to a non-vulnerable part of the DWSMA. For more information, discuss with MDH subject matter experts or the hydrologist or planner for the DWSMA or with stormwater staff at the MPCA. | ||
*If No, proceed to Step 6 | *If No, proceed to Step 6 | ||
Line 64: | Line 70: | ||
*If Yes, proceed to step 7 | *If Yes, proceed to step 7 | ||
− | ===Step 7 | + | ===Step 7=== |
+ | Will runoff from [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Potential_stormwater_hotspots Potential Stormwater Hotspots] (PSHs), as defined in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual, or runoff from highways enter the infiltration practice? | ||
*If No, proceed observing state and local stormwater requirements. See [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Dummy_page_2#Additional_requirements_and_guidance additional requirements and guidance below]. | *If No, proceed observing state and local stormwater requirements. See [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Dummy_page_2#Additional_requirements_and_guidance additional requirements and guidance below]. | ||
*If Yes, proceed to Step 8 | *If Yes, proceed to Step 8 | ||
− | ===Step 8 | + | ===Step 8=== |
+ | [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Potential_stormwater_hotspots#Infiltration_guidance Are [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Potential_stormwater_hotspots#General_guidelines_for_managing_stormwater_at_a_PSH infiltration guidelines for stormwater hotspots] as defined in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual followed?] | ||
*If Yes, proceed observing state and local stormwater requirements. See [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Dummy_page_2#Additional_requirements_and_guidance additional requirements and guidance below]. | *If Yes, proceed observing state and local stormwater requirements. See [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Dummy_page_2#Additional_requirements_and_guidance additional requirements and guidance below]. | ||
*If No, infiltration is generally not appropriate due to the potential for adverse effects to the aquifer used for drinking water supply. Consider other stormwater handling procedures such as stormwater retention and conveyance outside of the WHPA or moving the infiltration area to a non-vulnerable part of the DWSMA. For more information, discuss with MDH subject matter experts or the hydrologist or planner for the DWSMA or with stormwater staff at the MPCA. | *If No, infiltration is generally not appropriate due to the potential for adverse effects to the aquifer used for drinking water supply. Consider other stormwater handling procedures such as stormwater retention and conveyance outside of the WHPA or moving the infiltration area to a non-vulnerable part of the DWSMA. For more information, discuss with MDH subject matter experts or the hydrologist or planner for the DWSMA or with stormwater staff at the MPCA. |
This page provides guidance and recommendations for determining the appropriateness of infiltrating stormwater in a Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA). For more information on source water protection see Minnesota Department of Health.
You can access a flowchart to be used for determining the appropriateness of infiltration in DWSMAs at File:Flow Chart - MDH Stormwater Guidance for Sites in Drinking Water Supply Management Areas.pdf
The figure at the right illustrates protection designations used to manage public water supply wells that have wellhead protection plans.
The Minnesota Department of Health and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency developed joint guidance for determining the applicability of infiltration in a Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA). A step-by-step process for determining if infiltration is allowed and appropriate in a DWSMA is shown on the right. You can also access this flowchart at File:Flow Chart - MDH Stormwater Guidance for Sites in Drinking Water Supply Management Areas.pdf. Guidance and additional information to support the flowchart is found at File:Evaluating Proposed Stormwater Infiltration Projects in Vulnerable Wellhead Protection Areas.docx.
Is the site located in a DWSMA?
Is a Construction Stormwater General Permit required?
Is there a Local Government Unit with a current Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System permit that allows infiltration?
Is the site in a portion of the DWSMA that exhibits very high, high, or moderate vulnerability as defined by Minnesota Rules (4720.5100-5590)?
Is the site in the Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA) of an aquifer exhibiting fracture flow or karst conditions and that has less than 50 feet of unfractured geologic cover?
Is the site within the Emergency Response Area (ERA) and is vulnerability very high or high?
Is the proposed infiltration site within the ERA and the vulnerability is moderate, or outside the ERA (but still inside the WHPA) and the vulnerability is high or very high?
Will runoff from Potential Stormwater Hotspots (PSHs), as defined in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual, or runoff from highways enter the infiltration practice?
Are [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Potential_stormwater_hotspots#General_guidelines_for_managing_stormwater_at_a_PSH infiltration guidelines for stormwater hotspots as defined in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual followed?]
The following requirements and guidance apply to infiltration practices regardless of whether the site is located in a DWSMA.
If the site requires a Construction Stormwater General Permit, stormwater infiltration is prohibited in the following areas regardless of whether the site is located in a DWSMA.
For those conditions above in which a local unit of government with a Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit allows infiltration, follow the recommendations for infiltration practices in a DWSMA.
The following are recommendations for infiltration practices in a DWSMA regardless of whether the above step-by-step process indicates infiltration is appropriate or a Construction Stormwater permit is required.